Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An absolutely convergent series in Rn converges, and every rearrangement converges to the same sum

Statement

Let n∈N with n≥1 and let (xk) be a sequence in Rn whose series converges absolutely (Series of vectors in Rn, absolute convergence, rearrangement, and the set of rearrangement sums). Then:

  1. ∑xk converges; write s:=∑k=0∞xk.
  2. For every bijection σ:N→N (Injection, surjection, bijection) the rearranged series ∑xσ(k) converges absolutely, with ∑k=0∞xσ(k)=s.
  3. Consequently S(x)={s}: the set of rearrangement sums is a single point.

This is the Rn analogue of the published one-dimensional statements, not a generalisation of their proofs. If ∑∣ak∣ converges then ∑ak converges and Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: an absolutely convergent series converges unconditionally, and every rearrangement of it has the same sum are proved on the real line; everything below reduces to them coordinatewise, or to completeness of (Rn,d2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural n≥1; a sequence (xk) in Rn with ∑∥xk∥2 convergent; the vector partial sums sN=∑k<Nxk and the real partial sums TN=∑k<N∥xk∥2; a bijection σ of N; a rational ε>0.

[L7]

Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: if ∑ak converges absolutely then for every bijection σ of N the series ∑∣aσ(k)∣ converges with the same sum as ∑∣ak∣, and ∑aσ(k) converges with the same sum as ∑ak (Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: an absolutely convergent series converges unconditionally, and every rearrangement of it has the same sum, Absolutely convergent and conditionally convergent series, and the general starting index).

[L8]

Absolute convergence implies convergence for real series, and a convergent series of nonnegative terms is absolutely convergent, its terms being their own absolute values (If ∑∣ak∣ converges then ∑ak converges, Absolutely convergent and conditionally convergent series, and the general starting index).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3

For L≤N: sN−sL=∑k=LN−1xk and TN−TL=∑k=LN−1∥xk∥2, both by splitting, the vector identity being the pointwise reading of the real one.

1.2L4L8

The real sequence (TN) converges by hypothesis, hence is Cauchy in (R,dR): for every rational ε>0 there is K with ∣TN−TL∣<ε for all N,L≥K.

1.3L2

For every j<n and every k: 0≤∣(xk)j∣≤∥xk∥2.

1.4L7L8L1

Likewise k↦∥xσ(k)∥2 is the rearrangement along σ of k↦∥xk∥2, a convergent series of nonnegative terms and therefore absolutely convergent, so ∑k∥xσ(k)∥2 converges; that is, ∑xσ(k) converges absolutely.

2.1step 1.1L2

Hence ∥sN−sL∥2≤∑k=LN−1∥xk∥2=TN−TL by the finite triangle inequality.

2.2step 1.3L6L8

By step 1.3 and the comparison test, the real series ∑k∣(xk)j∣ converges for every j<n; so each coordinate series ∑k(xk)j converges absolutely.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2L4

By steps 2.1 and 1.2, for N≥L≥K we get d2(sN,sL)=∥sN−sL∥2≤∣TN−TL∣<ε, and the same bound with N and L exchanged; so (sN) is Cauchy in (Rn,d2).

3.2step 2.2L7

Fix a bijection σ. For every j<n the sequence k↦(xσ(k))j is the rearrangement along σ of the sequence k↦(xk)j; by step 2.2 the latter series converges absolutely, so Dirichlet's theorem gives that ∑k(xσ(k))j converges with the same sum as ∑k(xk)j.

4.1step 3.1L4

Since (Rn,d2) is complete, the Cauchy sequence (sN) converges; that is, ∑xk converges, which is clause 1. Write s for its sum.

5.1step 4.1step 3.2step 1.4L5

By clause 1 applied to the sequence k↦xσ(k), which converges absolutely by step 1.4, the series ∑xσ(k) converges; and by step 3.2 each coordinate of its sum equals the corresponding coordinate of s, so its sum is s. This is clause 2.

6.1step 4.1step 5.1L1∎

By clause 2 every rearrangement of ∑xk converges to s, and the identity bijection shows s∈S(x); so S(x)={s}, which is clause 3.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources