How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
auslander buchsbaum serre regularity criterion
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
For a nonzero Noetherian local ring the following are equivalent: is regular; ; ; and every finite -module has finite projective dimension. When these hold, . A nonzero finite module over regular local is maximal Cohen–Macaulay (depth ) if and only if it is free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
finite residue field projective dimension forces depth equals dimension: If the residue field of a nonzero Noetherian local ring has finite projective dimension, then is regular and .
regular local residue field projective dimension dimension: For a regular local ring of dimension , and for , with for .
local global dimension equals residue field projective dimension: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , , allowing infinity. If this common value is , every -module has projective dimension at most .
auslander buchsbaum formula: For a nonzero finite module of finite projective dimension over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , . Consequently such an with is free.
regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: A regular local ring of dimension is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system , the tuple is -regular and is regular local of dimension for all .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Proof
Regularity gives through the Koszul computation. Residue-field projective dimension equals global dimension, so this also bounds every module. Conversely finite projective dimension for every finite module applies to , and finite projective dimension for forces regularity. These implications prove the four-way equivalence and the numerical equalities, also for dimension zero.
Over a regular local ring every finite module has finite projective dimension and . Auslander–Buchsbaum therefore makes depth equivalent to projective dimension zero for a nonzero finite module, hence equivalent to freeness. Conversely a nonzero finite free module has the ring depth.
The useful freeness-lifting argument can also be seen directly. If is injective on a finite and is free over , lift a basis to a surjection by Nakayama, with finite kernel . A relation has coefficients divisible by , so it is ; injectivity on implies . Thus , and Nakayama gives . This includes a zero quotient basis, when .
Depends on
The Axiom of Choice
finite residue field projective dimension forces depth equals dimension
regular local residue field projective dimension dimension
local global dimension equals residue field projective dimension
auslander buchsbaum formula
regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma