How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is dense in for
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.
Let . Then is dense in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, , , and .
Box-step functions are dense in (Finite linear combinations of box indicators are dense in for ).
Finite-measure measurable sets admit compact cores with bounded open neighbourhoods of arbitrarily small excess (A finite-measure measurable set in has a compact core and a bounded open neighbourhood of arbitrarily small excess).
Compact sets inside bounded open sets admit explicit compactly supported continuous cutoffs (A compact set inside a bounded open set admits an explicit compactly supported continuous cutoff).
Minkowski's inequality holds in (Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including ).
Proof
By [L1], choose a box-step function [L1, L2, given, choose] with . For each , apply [L2] to choose and a bounded open set with
For each , [L3] gives with [L3, L4, step 1.1, construct, algebra] , on , and . Put Since vanishes off and has absolute value at most there, by [L4].
Therefore [step 1.1, step 2.1, algebra] Since , the space is dense in .
Depends on
Finite linear combinations of box indicators are dense in for
A compact set inside a bounded open set admits an explicit compactly supported continuous cutoff
A finite-measure measurable set in has a compact core and a bounded open neighbourhood of arbitrarily small excess
Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including