How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Strongly graded P(z) products from restricted-dual images
Statement
Let be strongly graded Möbius or conformal, and let be a full category of strongly graded generalized modules closed under restricted contragredients. For and , let be the sum of transposed images of all -maps with target in , with the transported action and the degree convention from the compatibility definition. If is an object of with this action, then represents the -maps. Its universal map is evaluation, its homogeneous components span as a vector space, and every representing product is canonically isomorphic to this one. If a representing product already exists, then ; thus the assumption follows whenever closure under images applies to this ambient strongly graded module homomorphism. There is no global weight-bound or CFT-type assumption.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses of the Statement, including the explicit membership assumption for .
Strongly graded contragredient duality for Möbius and conformal modules proves strong duality, opposite identities, double-dual evaluation and functorial transposition in this exact generality.
P(z)-compatibility subspace and local grading restriction, with its strong-duality supplier, proves that each transposed image intertwines the transported modes, has full compatibility and satisfies the local grading restrictions. Its sum defines .
P(z)-intertwining map gives the exact Jacobi, grading, truncation and Möbius bracket identities. P(z)-tensor product in a module category gives the relative representing bijection.
Proof
For homogeneous of auxiliary degrees , define componentwise by . Only of degree can contribute. Each fixed generalized-weight component is a functional on the finite-dimensional corresponding component of , hence an element of . For fixed , the components at , , vanish because the ONE degree integer string of is lower truncated. Finite sums of degrees handle arbitrary inputs. Compatibility in F2 transposes to the full -Jacobi identity for and the three transported identities transpose to its Möbius brackets. Thus is an actual -map, with target .
Given with , its transpose has its image in by the definition of that sum. Transposed Jacobi and the bracket identities make it a strong-module homomorphism. Its restricted transpose is a homomorphism , hence, by F1 and fullness, a morphism . Pairing with gives . Conversely, such a factorization forces to have exactly the values on every input; injectivity of the inclusion makes this transpose unique. Restricted duals separate finite components, so is unique. The same pairings show naturality in . This proves the representing property.
If the span of the homogeneous components of were proper, its intersection with some finite-dimensional -component would be proper. Choose a nonzero functional on that component vanishing on the intersection and extend it by zero to other components. It is an element , by F1, and it vanishes on every evaluation value, so for all inputs. The inclusion of in the algebraic dual is injective, a contradiction. This proves the vector-space spanning assertion without an unlicensed assumption that every submodule or quotient belongs to .
Suppose already represents. Every is for a morphism , so and every transposed image is contained in . The canonical map itself is one of the maps summed, giving the reverse inclusion. Thus . Once , steps 1.1–2.1 show that represents the same functor. Apply the two representing bijections to their canonical maps: the two comparison morphisms have compositions inducing the original universal maps, so uniqueness makes both compositions identities. This identifies with and transports step 3.1 to .