Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strongly graded P(z) products from restricted-dual images

Statement

Let V be strongly graded Möbius or conformal, and let C be a full category of strongly graded generalized modules closed under restricted contragredients. For W1,W2∈C and z≠0, let S be the sum of transposed images of all P(z)-maps with target in C, with the transported action and the degree convention S[h](β) from the compatibility definition. If S is an object of C with this action, then S′ represents the P(z)-maps. Its universal map κ is evaluation, its homogeneous components span S′ as a vector space, and every representing product is canonically isomorphic to this one. If a representing product (T,ι) already exists, then S=im⁡(ι′:T′→(W1⊗W2)∗); thus the assumption S∈C follows whenever closure under images applies to this ambient strongly graded module homomorphism. There is no global weight-bound or CFT-type assumption.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses of the Statement, including the explicit membership assumption for S.

[F1]

Strongly graded contragredient duality for Möbius and conformal modules proves strong duality, opposite identities, double-dual evaluation and functorial transposition in this exact generality.

[F2]

P(z)-compatibility subspace and local grading restriction, with its strong-duality supplier, proves that each transposed image intertwines the transported modes, has full compatibility and satisfies the local grading restrictions. Its sum defines S.

[F3]

P(z)-intertwining map gives the exact Jacobi, grading, truncation and Möbius bracket identities. P(z)-tensor product in a module category gives the relative representing bijection.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

For w1,w2 homogeneous of auxiliary degrees β1,β2, define κ(w1,w2) componentwise by ⟨s,κ(w1,w2)⟩=s(w1⊗w2). Only s of degree −β1−β2 can contribute. Each fixed generalized-weight component is a functional on the finite-dimensional corresponding component of S, hence an element of S′‾. For fixed h, the components at h−m, m→+∞, vanish because the ONE degree β1+β2 integer string of S′ is lower truncated. Finite sums of degrees handle arbitrary inputs. Compatibility in F2 transposes to the full P(z)-Jacobi identity for κ and the three transported L′(j) identities transpose to its Möbius brackets. Thus κ is an actual P(z)-map, with target S′∈C.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Given I:W1⊗W2→X‾ with X∈C, its transpose I′:X′→S has its image in S by the definition of that sum. Transposed Jacobi and the bracket identities make it a strong-module homomorphism. Its restricted transpose is a homomorphism S′→X′′, hence, by F1 and fullness, a morphism fI:S′→X. Pairing with x′∈X′ gives I=fI‾κ. Conversely, such a factorization forces fI′(x′) to have exactly the values ⟨x′,I(w1,w2)⟩ on every input; injectivity of the inclusion S↪(W1⊗W2)∗ makes this transpose unique. Restricted duals separate finite components, so fI is unique. The same pairings show naturality in X. This proves the representing property.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

If the span of the homogeneous components of κ(w1,w2) were proper, its intersection with some finite-dimensional (β,h)-component would be proper. Choose a nonzero functional on that component vanishing on the intersection and extend it by zero to other components. It is an element s∈(S′)′=S, by F1, and it vanishes on every evaluation value, so s(w1,w2)=0 for all inputs. The inclusion of S in the algebraic dual is injective, a contradiction. This proves the vector-space spanning assertion without an unlicensed assumption that every submodule or quotient belongs to C.

4.1F1F3step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Suppose (T,ι) already represents. Every I is f‾ι for a morphism f:T→X, so I′=ι′f′ and every transposed image is contained in im⁡ι′. The canonical map ι itself is one of the maps summed, giving the reverse inclusion. Thus S=im⁡ι′. Once S∈C, steps 1.1–2.1 show that S′ represents the same functor. Apply the two representing bijections to their canonical maps: the two comparison morphisms have compositions inducing the original universal maps, so uniqueness makes both compositions identities. This identifies T with S′ and transports step 3.1 to T.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources