Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Restricted variation and the full field equations

Statement

Let Cr,C,S,I,ϕ,ψ=I(ϕ) and the topological direct sum TψC=Vret(ϕ)⊕Vomit(ϕ) be as in the supplied definition. Set Sr=S∘I. Call ψ stationary for S when DS∣ψ=0 on all admissible full variations, and call ϕ stationary for Sr when DSr∣ϕ=0. Then DSr∣ϕ=(DIϕ)∗(DS∣ψ), so DSr∣ϕ=0 if and only if DS∣ψ annihilates Vret(ϕ). The configuration ψ is stationary for S if and only if the restrictions of DS∣ψ to both Vret(ϕ) and Vomit(ϕ) vanish. Therefore reduced stationarity implies full stationarity exactly when the omitted restriction also vanishes. No local Euler–Lagrange differential operator is asserted here; for an action whose boundary terms vanish, these are its variational stationarity conditions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Differentiable S:C→R, I:Cr→C, and the declared split TI(ϕ)C=Vret⊕Vomit.

[F1]

Retained and omitted variation spaces: DSr∣ϕ=(DIϕ)∗(DS∣ψ), so reduced stationarity is equivalent to DS∣ψ annihilating Vret(ϕ); every full variation decomposes uniquely into retained and omitted parts.

[A1]

“Stationary” means that the first-variation covector vanishes on every tangent variation in the stated configuration space. Boundary conditions and any gauge fixing or smooth quotient are already incorporated in that space.

Proof

1.1givenF1A1algebra

If DS∣ψ=0 on the full tangent space, its restrictions to both summands vanish. In particular, by [F1], DSr∣ϕ=(DIϕ)∗(DS∣ψ)=0.

2.1givenF1A1step 1.1algebra

Conversely, suppose both restrictions vanish. Every full variation is v=vret+vomit by [F1], so linearity gives DS∣ψ(v)=DS∣ψ(vret)+DS∣ψ(vomit)=0+0=0. Thus full stationarity is equivalent to the two restrictions vanishing.

3.1givenF1A1step 2.1algebra∎

The pullback identity in [F1] identifies reduced stationarity with vanishing of the retained restriction. Hence reduced stationarity implies full stationarity exactly when the omitted restriction vanishes as well; without that condition, the restricted variation leaves it untested.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 1 level

Sources