How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Restricted variation and the full field equations
Statement
Let and the topological direct sum be as in the supplied definition. Set . Call stationary for when on all admissible full variations, and call stationary for when . Then so if and only if annihilates . The configuration is stationary for if and only if the restrictions of to both and vanish. Therefore reduced stationarity implies full stationarity exactly when the omitted restriction also vanishes. No local Euler–Lagrange differential operator is asserted here; for an action whose boundary terms vanish, these are its variational stationarity conditions.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Differentiable , , and the declared split .
Retained and omitted variation spaces: , so reduced stationarity is equivalent to annihilating ; every full variation decomposes uniquely into retained and omitted parts.
“Stationary” means that the first-variation covector vanishes on every tangent variation in the stated configuration space. Boundary conditions and any gauge fixing or smooth quotient are already incorporated in that space.
Proof
If on the full tangent space, its restrictions to both summands vanish. In particular, by [F1], .
Conversely, suppose both restrictions vanish. Every full variation is by [F1], so linearity gives . Thus full stationarity is equivalent to the two restrictions vanishing.
The pullback identity in [F1] identifies reduced stationarity with vanishing of the retained restriction. Hence reduced stationarity implies full stationarity exactly when the omitted restriction vanishes as well; without that condition, the restricted variation leaves it untested.