Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions

Statement

Let m∈N with m≥1, with vector-valued functions, their components fi=πi∘f, their limits and their continuity as in Vector-valued functions f:A→Rm, their limits and continuity, with the dictionary to the metric notions.

  1. Continuity is componentwise. Let (X,dX) be a metric space, A⊆X, f:A→Rm and a∈A. Then f is continuous at a if and only if every component fi:A→R (i<m) is continuous at a.
  2. Limits are componentwise. Let A⊆R, let c be a limit point of A (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of R), let f:A→Rm and let L∈Rm. Then lim⁡x→cf(x)=L if and only if lim⁡x→cfi(x)=Li for every i<m (The ε-δ limit lim⁡x→cf(x)=L of f:A→R at a limit point c of A).
  3. Algebra. Let (X,dX), A, a be as in clause 1, let f,g:A→Rm be continuous at a and let λ∈R. Then f+g and λf (defined pointwise) are continuous at a; the real-valued function x↦⟨f(x),g(x)⟩ is continuous at a (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn); and for every norm N on Rm the real-valued function x↦N(f(x)) is continuous at a (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms).

Where m≥1 is spent. The "if" direction of clauses 1 and 2 divides ε by ι(m), which requires ι(m)≠0; and clause 3's last part quotes a bound available only for m≥1. The "only if" directions hold for every m but say nothing at m=0, there being no index i<0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural m≥1; a metric space (X,dX), a subset A⊆X, a point a∈A and functions f,g:A→Rm; a real λ; and a real ε>0.

[L2]

The comparison ∥y∥2≤∥y∥1=∑i<m∣yi∣, and N(y)≤C∥y∥1≤Cι(m)∥y∥2 with C:=max⁡{N(ei):i<m}≥0, together with ∣N(y)−N(z)∣≤N(y−z), all for m≥1 (The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n≥1 every norm N on Rn satisfies N(x)≤C∥x∥1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2 clauses 1, 2, 3, The p-norms ∥x∥p for rational p≥1, and ∥x∥∞, The standard list e:n→Fn with ei(i)=1F and ei(j)=0F for j≠i is an ordered basis of Fn; hence dim⁡FFn=n, and F0 is the zero space with basis ∅ and dimension 0).

[L5]

Laws of finite sums (Laws of finite sums and finite products, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion): additivity, scaling, monotonicity, ∑i<mμ=ι(m)μ, a sum of nonnegative terms is nonnegative, and each single term is at most such a sum.

[L7]

A nonempty finite set of reals has a minimum (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set); and a family of nonempty sets indexed by a natural number has a choice function, this being a theorem of ZF (Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values), which is what licenses picking one δi for each i<m.

[L8]

Absolute value (Basic properties of the absolute value): ∣t∣≥0, ∣st∣=∣s∣∣t∣, and ∣s+t∣≤∣s∣+∣t∣.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2

For every y∈Rm: ∣yi∣≤∥y∥2 for each i<m, and ∥y∥2≤∑i<m∣yi∣.

1.2L5L6

If ai<bi for every i<m and m≥1, then ∑i<mai<∑i<mbi: the list i↦bi−ai has positive terms, so its sum is at least its term at index 0, hence positive, and additivity gives the strict inequality.

1.3L7

For each i<m the set of positive reals δ witnessing continuity of fi at a for a given tolerance is nonempty whenever fi is continuous at a, so a choice function on the family indexed by m produces δ0,…,δm−1 simultaneously, with no choice principle used.

1.4L1L3L6L7

For f+g: given ε>0, pick δ1,δ2>0 for the tolerance ε/ι(2) at f and at g and put δ:=min⁡{δ1,δ2}; then for dX(x,a)<δ, ∥(f+g)(x)−(f+g)(a)∥2=∥(f(x)−f(a))+(g(x)−g(a))∥2≤∥f(x)−f(a)∥2+∥g(x)−g(a)∥2<ε.

1.5L1L3L6L8

For λf: if λ=0 then λf is constant and every δ serves; otherwise ∣λ∣>0, and a δ for the tolerance ε/∣λ∣ at f gives ∥λf(x)−λf(a)∥2=∣λ∣ ∥f(x)−f(a)∥2<ε.

1.6L1L2L6

For N∘f: by [L2], ∣N(f(x))−N(f(a))∣≤N(f(x)−f(a))≤Cι(m) ∥f(x)−f(a)∥2; so a δ for the tolerance ε/(Cι(m)+1) at f serves for N∘f.

1.7L1L3

For ⟨f,g⟩: first take δ0>0 with ∥g(x)−g(a)∥2<1 for dX(x,a)<δ0, so that ∥g(x)∥2≤∥g(x)−g(a)∥2+∥g(a)∥2<B:=∥g(a)∥2+1 there.

2.1step 1.1L1

Suppose f is continuous at a and fix i<m. Given ε>0, take δ from the definition; for x∈A with dX(x,a)<δ, step 1.1 gives ∣fi(x)−fi(a)∣≤∥f(x)−f(a)∥2<ε. So fi is continuous at a.

2.2step 1.3L1L6L7

Conversely suppose every fi is continuous at a. Given ε>0, the real ε/ι(m) is positive; by step 1.3 choose δi>0 for each i<m with ∣fi(x)−fi(a)∣<ε/ι(m) whenever x∈A and dX(x,a)<δi, and put δ:=min⁡{δ0,…,δm−1}>0.

2.3step 1.7L4L8

By bilinearity, ⟨f(x),g(x)⟩−⟨f(a),g(a)⟩=⟨f(x)−f(a), g(x)⟩+⟨f(a), g(x)−g(a)⟩, so Cauchy-Schwarz and step 1.7 give ∣⟨f(x),g(x)⟩−⟨f(a),g(a)⟩∣≤B ∥f(x)−f(a)∥2+∥f(a)∥2 ∥g(x)−g(a)∥2 for every x∈A with dX(x,a)<δ0.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.2L5L6

For x∈A with dX(x,a)<δ: each ∣fi(x)−fi(a)∣<ε/ι(m), so by steps 1.1 and 1.2, ∥f(x)−f(a)∥2≤∑i<m∣fi(x)−fi(a)∣<∑i<mε/ι(m)=ε. Hence f is continuous at a, and clause 1 is proved.

3.2step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L1L5L6L7

Clause 2 is the same two estimates with f(a) replaced by L, fi(a) by Li, and the condition dX(x,a)<δ by 0<∣x−c∣<δ: step 1.1 gives ∣fi(x)−Li∣≤∥f(x)−L∥2 for the forward direction, and steps 1.1, 1.2 give ∥f(x)−L∥2≤∑i<m∣fi(x)−Li∣<ε for the converse, with δ the minimum of m radii obtained as in step 2.2.

3.3step 1.7step 2.3L1L6L7

Put P:=B+∥f(a)∥2+1>0 and take δ≤δ0 positive with both ∥f(x)−f(a)∥2<ε/P and ∥g(x)−g(a)∥2<ε/P for dX(x,a)<δ; then step 2.3 bounds the difference by (B+∥f(a)∥2)ε/P<ε, so ⟨f,g⟩ is continuous at a.

4.1step 3.1step 3.2step 1.4step 1.5step 1.6step 3.3∎

Steps 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 and 3.3 are clause 3, and with steps 3.1 and 3.2 all three clauses are proved.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources