Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A contour integral of a jointly continuous, parameter-holomorphic integrand is holomorphic

Statement

Let γ:[a,b]→C be a rectifiable contour with trace γ∗, let Ω⊆C be open, and let φ:γ∗×Ω→C be continuous, with z↦φ(w,z) holomorphic on Ω for every w∈γ∗. Then

F(z):=∫γφ(ζ,z) dζ

is defined for every z∈Ω and is holomorphic on Ω.

Here γ∗×Ω carries the Euclidean metric of R4 under the coordinate identification of the plane, so continuity of φ is joint continuity in the two variables together.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rectifiable contour γ:[a,b]→C, an open Ω⊆C, and a continuous φ:γ∗×Ω→C with φ(w,⋅) holomorphic on Ω for each w∈γ∗; write Φ(a+bi)=(a,b) and use J(w,z)=(Φ(w),Φ(z)) for product coordinates. By The complex coordinate isometry transports topology and affine segments in each factor, ∥J(w,z)−J(w0,z0)∥22=∣w−w0∣2+∣z−z0∣2. Here locally uniform convergence means that every point has an open neighbourhood on which the convergence is uniform; this is the explicit convention of Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and their derivatives converge locally uniformly.

[L1]

For a rectifiable contour γ:[a,b]→C with a<b, a continuous f on γ∗, a partition a=t0<⋯<tr=b and tags ξi∈[ti,ti+1], the difference between ∫γf dz and ∑i<rf(γ(ξi))(γ(ti+1)−γ(ti)) has modulus at most ωL(γ) whenever ω≥0 satisfies ∣f(u)−f(v)∣≤ω for all u,v∈γ∗ (Tagged sums approximate a contour integral within oscillation times length).

[L2]

If each fn:Ω→C is holomorphic on an open Ω and fn→f locally uniformly on Ω, then f is holomorphic (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and their derivatives converge locally uniformly).

[L3]

A continuous map from a compact metric space to a metric space is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous).

[L5]

A compact subset of a metric space is closed and bounded (A compact subset of a metric space is closed and bounded).

[L7]

A linear combination αf+βg of functions complex differentiable at a point is complex differentiable there, with (αf+βg)′=αf′+βg′, and every constant function has derivative 0 (Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives).

[L8]

For a rectifiable γ:[a,b]→C and f continuous on its trace, the complex line integral ∫γf dz exists (Continuous integrands have complex and absolute line integrals along every rectifiable path).

[L9]

For a<b and a natural N≥1 the uniform partition of [a,b] into N parts has points ti=a+i(b−a)/N and mesh (b−a)/N (Partition of [a,b] as a finite strictly increasing list a=t0<t1<⋯<tn=b, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions).

[L10]

For every real ε>0 there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

[L11]

B(x,r) is the set of points at distance below r from x and Bˉ(x,r) the set at distance at most r; a set is open exactly when each of its points has some ball around it inside the set, open balls are open and closed balls are closed (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open sets are open, open balls are open and closed balls are closed).

[L12]

A complex contour is a rectifiable path γ:[a,b]→C, so L(γ) is a nonnegative real (Rectifiable complex contours, reversal, concatenation, closedness, and orientation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL4L6

The parameter interval [a,b] is compact by [L4] and γ is continuous, so the trace γ∗ is compact by [L6].

1.2givenL8

For each z∈Ω the map ζ↦φ(ζ,z) is continuous on γ∗, so F(z) exists by [L8].

1.3givenL7L9

Write PN for the uniform partition of [a,b] into N parts, with points tiN=a+i(b−a)/N, and set SN(z)=∑i<Nφ(γ(tiN),z)(γ(ti+1N)−γ(tiN)) for z∈Ω, assuming a<b. Each summand is a constant multiple of a function holomorphic on Ω, so SN is holomorphic on Ω by [L7].

2.1givenstep 1.1L3L4L5L11

Fix z0∈Ω. By [L11] choose s>0 with B(z0,s)⊆Ω and put ρ=s/2>0, so Bˉ(z0,ρ)⊆B(z0,s)⊆Ω; put K=Bˉ(z0,ρ), which is closed and bounded, hence compact by [L4]. By [L5] and step 1.1 both γ∗ and K are closed and bounded, and their coordinate images have these properties by the given isometry. Their product is bounded because squared product distance is the sum of the two squared distances. It is closed because a point outside the product has a coordinate outside one closed factor; a ball in the open complement of that factor lifts, by the 1-Lipschitz product projection, to a product-metric ball missing the product. Hence J[γ∗×K] is closed and bounded in R4 and compact by [L4]; the distance identity for J transfers this compactness back by carrying open covers and finite subcovers in both directions; since φ is continuous there, [L3] makes it uniformly continuous on γ∗×K.

3.1step 2.1L3L4L10choose

Let ε>0. Step 2.1 gives η>0 such that ∣φ(u,z)−φ(v,z)∣≤ε whenever u,v∈γ∗ satisfy ∣u−v∣<η and z∈K. The interval [a,b] is compact by [L4], so γ is uniformly continuous on it by [L3]: there is δ>0 with ∣γ(t)−γ(s)∣<η whenever ∣t−s∣<δ. By [L10] applied to δ/(b−a) there is a natural n≥1 with (b−a)/n<δ.

4.1step 1.2step 1.3step 3.1L1L12

Let N≥n and z∈K. Every two parameters in a subinterval of PN differ by at most (b−a)/N≤(b−a)/n<δ, so any two points of γ([tiN,ti+1N]) are within η of each other and step 3.1 bounds ∣φ(u,z)−φ(v,z)∣ by ε for such points. Applying [L1] to f=φ(⋅,z) on each subarc, with ω=ε on that subarc, and summing the subarc bounds gives ∣F(z)−SN(z)∣≤εL(γ).

5.1step 1.3step 4.1L2L7L11L12∎

Since ε>0 was arbitrary and L(γ) is a fixed nonnegative real by [L12], step 4.1 says SN→F uniformly on K, hence uniformly on the open neighbourhood B(z0,ρ) of z0; as z0∈Ω was arbitrary, SN→F locally uniformly on Ω, and [L2] with step 1.3 makes F holomorphic on Ω. If instead a=b then ∫γf dz=0 for every continuous f, so F is identically 0 and holomorphic by [L7].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources