How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Forward equation and stationary laws for finite-state rate processes
Statement
Let be a finite-state continuous-time Markov jump process on with finite state set , bounded continuous rates , and row generator under the first-jump convention. Let and regard as a row vector. If , then is continuously differentiable on with the corresponding one-sided derivatives at the endpoints, and
If , the differential assertion is vacuous and the only time marginal is . In either case, if a probability row vector satisfies for every and , then for all . For constant rates this says that every generator-stationary probability vector is an invariant law of the process.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite state set, bounded continuous rates, the rate-process convention, and an initial probability row vector.
Finite-state continuous-time Markov jump processes with bounded rates: conditional on state at time , the no-jump survival over is , and the density of a first jump to at time is the survival to times .
Path densities and finite jump counts for bounded finite-state rates: on a short interval, the probability of at least two jumps is , and each finite path has the stated jump-time density.
The integral with oriented limits: and and The first fundamental theorem: if is integrable on and continuous at , then ; in particular a continuous has as a primitive: the integral of a continuous matrix-valued function is defined componentwise and differentiates to that function.
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then evaluates the integral of an integrable derivative as the endpoint difference, including one-sided endpoint derivatives.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice, carried by the Lebesgue path-density argument in [F2].
Proof
Given: The data in the Statement.
If , the only time is and is its initial law. Suppose . By the first-jump convention, the no-jump probability from over is . For , the probability of exactly one jump and no further jump is . Paths with at least two jumps contribute by [F2]. Hence the conditional endpoint transition probabilities equal for , and for . Averaging this expansion over the finite states gives ; the same estimate from the left shows is continuous. By the Markov property, for each , There are finitely many states, so the remainder remains after summation. Dividing by and taking gives the stated forward equation; applying the same expansion at gives the left derivative. Its right-hand side is continuous because the rate functions and each are continuous, hence is continuously differentiable on the interior, with the corresponding one-sided derivatives at the endpoints.
Suppose and . The constant function satisfies the forward equation. If is the difference of any other solution and , then and . For , each component of is differentiable on , with one-sided endpoint derivatives, and its derivative is continuous, hence integrable. Applying the second fundamental theorem in [F4] componentwise gives For this identity holds by the zero-interval convention. Use the vector -norm and let , the maximum absolute row sum. Let . Since is a row vector, the triangle inequality gives . Iterating the integral equation yields for every integer . This bound tends to zero as , so for every . Therefore .
In the constant-rate case, is exactly the coordinate condition for each , so step 2.1 proves invariance of the stated generator-stationary law.
Depends on
Finite-state continuous-time Markov jump processes with bounded rates
Path densities and finite jump counts for bounded finite-state rates
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The integral with oriented limits: and
The first fundamental theorem: if is integrable on and continuous at , then ; in particular a continuous has as a primitive
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then