How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite Swendsen–Wang update preserves the Potts law
Statement
For a finite simple graph , integer , and finite activities , let be the normalized finite Potts law and let the Swendsen–Wang update be the two-stage procedure of activating equal-spin edges with probabilities and independently recoloring each resulting component uniformly from . Its transition kernel preserves . The procedure always terminates after finitely many edge and component operations. No irreducibility, uniqueness, convergence-rate, or critical-mixing claim is made.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite graph, integer , and finite nonnegative edge activities.
Finite Potts and Fortuin–Kasteleyn weights: , , and the FK edge weight is .
Finite Edwards–Sokal coupling and correlation identity: for , the normalized joint law has Potts spin marginal , FK edge marginal , and, conditional on any positive-probability edge set, independent uniform colors on its connected components. These are the exact current supplier interfaces used below.
Finite Potts Swendsen–Wang update: edges with unequal endpoint spins are absent; equal-spin edges are independently activated with probability ; each component is then recolored independently and uniformly.
Proof
Given: [F1]–[F3], with the exact finite conventions stated above.
For each fixed spin configuration , summing over factors over edges. An unequal-spin edge must be absent and contributes ; an equal-spin edge contributes either or . Thus , which is positive by [F1]. Dividing by this conditional normalizer shows that under , given , unequal-spin edges are forced absent and equal-spin edges are independent Bernoulli variables with activation probabilities , including probability zero when . This is exactly the first stage of [F3].
Every edge set produced in step 1.1 has : all active edges have and equal endpoint spins, while inactive edges contribute . Therefore . By [F2], conditional on this edge set, its components receive independent uniform colors. This is exactly the second stage of [F3].
Start with distributed as the spin marginal of . By step 1.1, after the first stage the pair has joint law . By step 2.1, the new configuration is then drawn from the spin conditional law . Summing over the finite edge-set space shows that its marginal is the spin marginal of , namely . Hence the update preserves .
The graph has finitely many edges, so the first stage performs one draw per edge; the second stage performs one draw per connected component of a finite graph. Both stages therefore terminate after finitely many operations.