Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite Swendsen–Wang update preserves the Potts law

Statement

For a finite simple graph G=(V,E), integer Q≥2, and finite activities ve≥0, let πP(σ)=wP(σ)/ZP be the normalized finite Potts law and let the Swendsen–Wang update be the two-stage procedure of activating equal-spin edges with probabilities ve/(1+ve) and independently recoloring each resulting component uniformly from [Q]. Its transition kernel preserves πP. The procedure always terminates after finitely many edge and component operations. No irreducibility, uniqueness, convergence-rate, or critical-mixing claim is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite graph, integer Q≥2, and finite nonnegative edge activities.

[F1]

Finite Potts and Fortuin–Kasteleyn weights: wP(σ)=∏e={u,v}∈E(1+ve1{σ(u)=σ(v)}), ZP=∑σwP(σ)>0, and the FK edge weight is wFK(A)=QkG(A)∏e∈Ave.

[F2]

Finite Edwards–Sokal coupling and correlation identity: for W(σ,A)=∏e∉A1∏e∈Ave1{σ(ue)=σ(we)}, the normalized joint law ν(σ,A)=W(σ,A)/∑τ,BW(τ,B) has Potts spin marginal wP/ZP, FK edge marginal wFK/ZFK, and, conditional on any positive-probability edge set, independent uniform colors on its connected components. These are the exact current supplier interfaces used below.

[F3]

Finite Potts Swendsen–Wang update: edges with unequal endpoint spins are absent; equal-spin edges are independently activated with probability ve/(1+ve); each component is then recolored independently and uniformly.

Proof

Given: [F1]–[F3], with the exact finite conventions stated above.

1.1F1F2F3algebra

For each fixed spin configuration σ, summing W(σ,A) over A⊆E factors over edges. An unequal-spin edge must be absent and contributes 1; an equal-spin edge contributes either 1 or ve. Thus ∑AW(σ,A)=∏e∈E(1+ve1{σ(ue)=σ(we)})=wP(σ), which is positive by [F1]. Dividing by this conditional normalizer shows that under ν, given σ, unequal-spin edges are forced absent and equal-spin edges are independent Bernoulli variables with activation probabilities ve/(1+ve), including probability zero when ve=0. This is exactly the first stage of [F3].

2.1F2F3step 1.1

Every edge set produced in step 1.1 has W(σ,A)>0: all active edges have ve>0 and equal endpoint spins, while inactive edges contribute 1. Therefore ν(A)>0. By [F2], conditional on this edge set, its components receive independent uniform colors. This is exactly the second stage of [F3].

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Start with σ distributed as the spin marginal πP of ν. By step 1.1, after the first stage the pair (σ,A) has joint law ν. By step 2.1, the new configuration σ′ is then drawn from the spin conditional law ν(⋅∣A). Summing over the finite edge-set space shows that its marginal is the spin marginal of ν, namely πP. Hence the update preserves πP.

4.1F1F3∎

The graph has finitely many edges, so the first stage performs one draw per edge; the second stage performs one draw per connected component of a finite graph. Both stages therefore terminate after finitely many operations.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources