Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local kinetic energy and first and second momentum expectations

Statement

Assume AC and the hypotheses of Spatial random-occupation conditional mark entropy bound. Fix a bounded half-open cube Δ⊆[0,∞)d; then Δ⊆ΛLn for all sufficiently large n. By torus translation invariance this placement gives the same limits as any fixed translate of the cube. Let NΔ(q)=#(q∩Δ). For b>0 and K(p)=∣p∣2/(2mE0), the full shell law satisfies EMnph∑x∈q∩ΔK(px)→dρ∣Δ∣/(2b),EMnph∑x∈q∩Δpx,i→0, EMnph∑x∈q∩Δpx,ipx,j→(mE0ρ∣Δ∣/b)δij. The corresponding canonical and marked variational-grand laws have the same limits by their independent Gaussian marking. Momentum is in kg m s^-1, E_0K is in joules, and b=E_0/(k_BT) is dimensionless. These conclusions concern only the named moments, not every unbounded mark observable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A fixed cube, the model and Gaussian kernel, the shell and canonical laws, and the local conditional KL bound.

[A1]

AC is used in the relative-entropy variational inequality (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Spatial random-occupation conditional mark entropy bound: expected conditional KL for the marks attached to points in Δ, relative to νb⊗NΔ, tends to zero.

[F2]

Gaussian mark normalization, moments, and exponential controls: for g=K,p_i,p_ip_j the centered log moment-generating function c_g(t) is finite near zero and O(t²); the respective means are d/(2b), 0, and (mE_0/b)δ_ij.

[F3]

Total-energy concentration and controlled canonical windows and Interacting marked phase-space and reference measures: the shell is supported on ∣H/Vn−eb∣≤δn, stability bounds the positional energy below, and the positional shell and canonical laws are torus-translation invariant.

[F4]

Relative Entropy Variational, Chain, and Conditioning Rules: for every bounded measurable h, D(P||Q)≥P(h)-log Q(e^h).

[F5]

Full phase shell marginal satisfies the positional variational bound: the exact-N positional canonical expectations of every local-tame test, including NΔ, converge to P∗, and NΔ is local-tame.

[F6]

Existence of the independent Gaussian-marked positional lift: P∗ has a probability lift whose marks, conditional on positions, are independent with law νb.

Proof

Given: The stated assumptions and supplier definitions.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4construct

Fix one named g and write SΔ=∑x∈q∩Δ(g(px)−Eνg). For positive t in reciprocal units to g, the unbounded test tSΔ is dimensionless; define hM:=max⁡(−M,min⁡(M,tSΔ)) and first use this bounded truncation in [F4]. The bounds ∣hM∣≤t∣SΔ∣ and ehM≤1+etSΔ, together with shell integrability from [F3] and the Gaussian exponential moment [F2], permit dominated convergence as M→∞. Since NΔ≤Nn and cg(t) is finite near zero, the reference exponential moment is finite at each n. Thus the variational inequality extends to tSΔ and gives tEbn,Δ(.∣q)SΔ≤D(bn,Δ(.∣q)∣∣νb⊗NΔ)+NΔcg(t) for sufficiently small t>0. Testing with -tS_Δ gives the analogous inequality for -E S_Δ and c_g(-t). The integrals are finite: the shell bounds total kinetic energy at each n, and the Gaussian exponential moments exist by [F2]. Averaging over B_n yields ∣EMnphSΔ∣≤{EBnD(bn,Δ∣∣νb⊗NΔ)+EBnNΔmax⁡(cg(t),cg(−t))}/t.

2.1A1F1F2F3F5F6step 1.1algebra∎

For any fixed exact-Nn configuration on the torus, averaging NΔ over all torus translations gives Nn∣Δ∣/Vn: each of its Nn points is translated into Δ for a set of translation parameters of Lebesgue measure ∣Δ∣. Translation invariance of Bn and Cnpos therefore gives EBnNΔ=ECnposNΔ=Nn∣Δ∣/Vn→ρ∣Δ∣. For fixed t>0, the first numerator term in step 1.1 vanishes by [F1]. The limsup is at most ρ∣Δ∣max⁡(cg(t),cg(−t))/t; this tends to zero as t↓0 because cg(±t)=O(t2) by [F2]. Hence EMnphSΔ→0. Adding EBnNΔ Eνbg and substituting the three means in [F2] proves the shell formulas. By [F5], EP∗NΔ=lim⁡nECnposNΔ=ρ∣Δ∣. Conditional independent marking [F6] gives the same three limits for the variational-grand marked law; the exact canonical law has them by independent marking as well.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources