How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Full phase shell marginal satisfies the positional variational bound
Statement
Assume AC, the ultrafilter extension principle, DC and HB, the exact superstable regular pair interaction and periodic-image convention of Interacting marked phase-space and reference measures, and integer side lengths with exact particle numbers at an interior attainable density. Fix . Assume the positional canonical log rate is , and choose finite with where is the grand pressure per numerical volume with Lebesgue normalization. Let the positional grand variational minimizer of Superstable regular continuum grand pressure and variational formula at activity and inverse temperature be the singleton . Let be the phase reference of Interacting marked phase-space and reference measures, let be the band of Total-energy concentration and controlled canonical windows, set , and let be its positional marginal. For any local-tame test , write and , where is the periodic continuation. Let be the barycenter of under . Then converges to in , equivalently for every local-tame ; also for every such . The periodized empirical fields of the exact- canonical laws converge in probability in to by Periodic fixed-particle canonical limit, and has intensity . Here is an infinite-volume positional variational state; no finite-volume grand-canonical local convergence or DLR identification is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The choice hypotheses, model, exact-N_n sequence, shell law, interior density, supporting activity and singleton minimizer in the Statement.
AC, the ultrafilter extension principle, DC and HB are exactly the choice hypotheses assumed by the current local-tame compactness, continuum pressure and periodic fixed-N suppliers.
Full uniform phase shell has vanishing specific canonical KL: D(M_n^ph || C_n^ph)=o(V_n) for the specified full phase band and canonical reference.
Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation and Cell-quadratic lower bound from superstability: for the unit cells , with their point counts, every finite configuration has for fixed , and stability gives . Applying the same stability inequality to a two-point configuration gives for every nonzero separation . The periodic versions used below are proved by period replication in step 2.1.
Diagonal gap for a decreasing integrable interaction tail: the regular tail has a nonnegative summable unit-cell envelope whose tail sum tends to zero, and supplies real corridor widths with .
Periodic fixed-particle canonical limit: at an interior density the exact positional 1/N! canonical log-partition rate is F_b(ρ) for the chosen sequence; the theorem also supplies canonical empirical-field concentration near the positional variational minimizers.
Compactness of Finite-Specific-Entropy Levels in the Local-Tame Topology and Specific Relative Entropy Density: bounded specific entropy gives compactness in τ_L, and I(P) is the large-cube relative-entropy limit and is lower semicontinuous there.
Superstable regular continuum grand pressure and variational formula and Canonical–grand-canonical thermodynamic duality: normalized-Poisson pressure is -min_P{I(P)+bΦ(P)-ρ(P)α}, the Lebesgue 1/N! pressure is one larger, and the supporting equality makes the minimum 1-F_b(ρ)-αρ; Φ is lower semicontinuous.
Total-energy concentration and controlled canonical windows and Interacting marked phase-space and reference measures: the band has finite positive reference measure and is contained in the energy window with ; its normalized restriction defines , and the finite canonical and band laws are invariant under torus translations.
Relative Entropy Variational, Chain, and Conditioning Rules: finite-region relative entropy obeys the conditional chain rule, restriction contraction, its bounded-test variational formula, and nonnegativity. For the finite- chain rules use the common labelled-coordinate representation from [F11]; its position and mark spaces are standard Borel.
Periodized empirical field of a finite configuration and Stationarity and intensity of a periodized empirical field: a finite torus configuration determines a stationary empirical field of intensity ; for a finite-volume law , its empirical-field barycenter is stationary with intensity . Its evaluation on an integrable local-tame is measurable and equals the spatial average .
Poisson Reference Counts and Translation Invariance: restrictions of the unit-intensity Poisson law to disjoint bounded Borel sets are independent, and the probability of an empty region of volume is .
The exact- configuration space in the integer cube is a standard-Borel Borel subset of the finite product of the standard-Borel cell spaces in Poisson Configuration Reference. The exact results used from its current mathematical dependency closure are Finite products of standard Borel spaces are standard Borel, Borel subspaces admit polish presentations, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Kolmogorov extension for arbitrary families of standard Borel coordinate spaces, and For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique. Equivalently, for finite- entropy chain rules use labelled positions in the Borel no-collision subset of and marks in ; these are standard Borel, and the common symmetric labelled densities retain the same factor, which cancels in likelihood ratios. The countable product law of independent tile configurations exists by the Kolmogorov extension result in that closure, and its product with the uniform lattice phase exists by the sigma-finite product-measure result there.
Proof
Given: The hypotheses and exact current suppliers in Facts & Assumptions.
Put D_n=D(M_n^ph || C_n^ph), and let B_n be the positional marginal. The conditional chain rule gives so D(B_n||C_n^pos)≤D_n by the conditional chain rule [F8]. The canonical positional density relative to full Poisson probability Q_Λn is 1_{N=N_n} exp(-bU_n,per)/Z_Q,n^pos, where Z_Q,n^pos=exp(-V_n)Z_n,N_n^pos. Integrating the log likelihood against B_n gives By [F1] and [F4], V_n^-1 log Z_Q,n^pos→F_b(ρ)-1; hence the right side divided by V_n has limsup at most 1-F_b(ρ).
For every sufficiently large , the periodized-image series is absolutely convergent by [F3]. Given a finite in the shell, form . Since is an integer, its unit-cell occupation pattern repeats exactly times. In the pair sum for , each fixed image offset has multiplicity factor , which tends to and is bounded by . For finite periodic energy, absolute convergence lets us first restrict to finitely many offsets with arbitrarily small omitted absolute tail; the factors converge on that finite set and keep the omitted tail bounded, so . If any image term is , the desired lower bound is automatic. Applying [F2] to , dividing by , and taking the limit proves ; the same replication applied to the stability bound proves . On the full shell from [F7], . The periodized cell bound yields , uniformly bounded. Because is an integer, its torus is tiled by unit cells; torus translation invariance makes all equal, so each is bounded by the preceding sum divided by . Cauchy–Schwarz then gives a uniform bound for every pair of cells. For the negative pair terms, each bounded-distance cell has finitely many neighboring cells and each term is bounded below by by [F2]; for remaining offsets, [F3] supplies the summable envelope . Hence the expected sum of negative pair magnitudes is , and so is the total negative part of . The shell upper bound on then gives . Since the sum of positive pair terms equals plus the sum of negative pair magnitudes, its expectation is also . Therefore .
Let be the real corridor width supplied by [F3] at , and set . Then and , and is an integer. By [F11], take independent tile configurations with law on and independently choose a uniform phase in . The map from these data to the union configuration is measurable: for each bounded Borel observation set, only finitely many tile indices can meet it, and each resulting count is a finite sum of Borel indicators of the finite cell-coordinate lists. Thus the constructed law is well-defined and locally finite. Translating the phase preserves its uniform law and only relabels the independent, identically distributed tiles, so is translation-stationary. Put . Its intensity is . For a fixed local-tame test supported in a bounded set , choose larger than its coordinate diameter. The random phase puts wholly inside an occupied tile with probability at least . On this event torus translation invariance of gives exactly its local law. For any Borel set , torus invariance and the exact count give The first equality uses invariance; for each fixed configuration, the integral in the numerator sums over its points, and each point lies in for a set of translations of measure . Apply this identity to each occupied portion of on the bad phase set; gap portions contain no points. The phase-averaged expectation of on that set is at most its probability times . Since and is bounded, .
Fix and a lattice phase, and restrict to a large observation cube. Its intersections with complete occupied tiles have independent laws ; its gap pieces are empty; and only tile intersections meet the observation boundary. The Poisson restrictions on these disjoint pieces are independent by [F10]. For each complete occupied tile, the relative entropy is ; restriction contraction [F8] bounds each boundary-tile contribution by this same finite value. An empty gap piece has entropy . Product additivity follows by iterating the chain rule [F8]. For the mixture over the uniform phase, integrate the variational objective from [F8] for any bounded test and bound it by the phase-average conditional entropy; taking the supremum shows the mixture entropy is at most that average. Divide by observation volume and let the cube grow: the complete-tile density tends to , the gap-volume density to , and the boundary contribution to zero. The specific-entropy limit exists by [F5], so For the energy comparison, assign half of each pair term to each endpoint cell. Step 2.1 gives uniformly, a bound on the total negative pair magnitude, and a bound on the total positive pair sum: the latter is the total energy plus the negative pair magnitude, hence is bounded by the positive part of the total energy plus that magnitude. Fix . Periodic-image pairs of torus separation at most that are absent from the finite-tile free energy cross a tile face; their endpoints lie in a boundary strip of width containing unit cells. The negative contribution per such cell is bounded by the finite number of near offsets, from [F2], and the pair-count bound; the expected positive contribution per cell is bounded by the total positive pair-sum estimate and torus translation invariance. Thus the expected absolute fixed-range discrepancy divided by is . For remaining pairs, [F3] bounds the expected absolute energy per volume by , tending to zero as . Cross-tile pairs have separation at least ; the same tail bound with cutoff tends to zero as . Taking first at fixed and then therefore gives . Combining the entropy bound, step 1.1, and gives Here the gap fraction vanishes because .
Stability gives , so step 4.1 bounds . Compactness [F5] supplies a convergent subsequence from every subsequence. If is a cluster point, intensity is continuous in because the unit-cell count is a local-tame test, hence . Lower semicontinuity and step 4.1 give . Subtract and apply the variational lower bound and exact minimum [F6]; must attain the grand variational minimum. The singleton hypothesis forces . Thus every cluster point is , compactness gives , and step 3.1 gives for every local-tame . By [F9], is stationary with intensity , and torus invariance gives ; therefore in . For the exact- canonical law , [F4] says its periodized empirical field converges in outer probability in to . For a local-tame with , [F9] makes measurable and gives , uniformly in . Thus in probability and the variables are uniformly bounded; for each , for a common bound , so . Torus translation invariance and [F9] identify . Hence the exact- canonical positional local expectations also converge to .
Depends on
Finite products of standard Borel spaces are standard Borel
Borel subspaces admit polish presentations
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Kolmogorov extension for arbitrary families of standard Borel coordinate spaces
For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique
The Axiom of Choice
The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain
Interacting marked phase-space and reference measures
Local-Tame Topology
Poisson Configuration Reference
Poisson Reference Counts and Translation Invariance
Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation
The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF
Diagonal gap for a decreasing integrable interaction tail
Cell-quadratic lower bound from superstability
Relative Entropy Variational, Chain, and Conditioning Rules
Full uniform phase shell has vanishing specific canonical KL
Canonical–grand-canonical thermodynamic duality
Superstable regular continuum grand pressure and variational formula
Compactness of Finite-Specific-Entropy Levels in the Local-Tame Topology
Periodic fixed-particle canonical limit
Specific Relative Entropy Density
Total-energy concentration and controlled canonical windows
Periodized empirical field of a finite configuration
Stationarity and intensity of a periodized empirical field
The ultrafilter extension principle (UL/BPI)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- H.-O. Georgii, Large deviations and the equivalence of ensembles for Gibbsian particle systems with superstable interaction
- H.-O. Georgii and H. Zessin, Large deviations and the maximum entropy principle for marked point random fields
- D. Ruelle, Superstable Interactions in Classical Statistical Mechanics