How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite -module. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian local ring and a nonzero finite module.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Under the assumed Choice, if lies in the Jacobson radical and is finitely generated, then implies .
Depth zero and associated primes: Under the assumed Choice, if for a nonzero finite module over a Noetherian ring, then its depth with respect to is zero exactly when is contained in an associated prime.
Proof
Since , [F1] gives , so [F2] applies with . Its published proof uses finiteness of associated primes through an AC-qualified prime filtration; the assumed Choice supplies that premise. It says depth is zero exactly when for some associated prime .
Every associated prime is proper and every proper ideal of a local ring is contained in . Hence forces , proving both directions.