Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Differentiation and polynomial multiplication preserve tempered distributions

Statement

For u∈S′(Rn), a multi-index α, and a complex polynomial P, define

⟨∂αu,φ⟩=(−1)∣α∣⟨u,∂αφ⟩,⟨Pu,φ⟩=⟨u,Pφ⟩.

Both results lie in S′. For fixed α or P, these operations are continuous in both the weak and strong dual topologies, and their restrictions to D agree with the corresponding operations on D′.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A tempered distribution u, a multi-index α, and a complex polynomial P (Tempered distribution).

[F1]

Differentiation and polynomial multiplication are continuous linear endomorphisms of Schwartz space (Basic operations are continuous on Schwartz space, Smooth polynomially bounded multipliers on schwartz space).

[F2]

Weak and strong dual topologies use point tests and bounded test sets (Weak and strong topologies on tempered distributions).

[F3]

On D′, distributional differentiation has the same sign and smooth multiplication has the same transpose formula (Distributional derivative, Multiplication of a distribution by a smooth function).

Proof

technique · transposition and bounded-set transport
1.1F1given

Each displayed functional is the composition of u with a continuous Schwartz endomorphism, followed in the derivative case by a scalar sign. It is therefore continuous and complex-linear on S, hence belongs to S′.

2.1F2step 1.1

For a single test φ, the absolute value after either operation is a source weak seminorm evaluated at the transformed test. Thus each operation is weakly continuous.

2.2F1F2step 1.1

A continuous linear Schwartz endomorphism sends bounded sets to bounded sets. For a bounded B, the target strong seminorm is therefore the source strong seminorm on ∂αB or PB (the derivative sign disappears under absolute values). This proves strong continuity.

3.1F3∎

If ψ∈D, then ∂αψ and Pψ are again compactly supported tests. Evaluating the two displayed definitions on ψ gives exactly the formulas in [F3]. Hence restriction to D′ commutes with both operations. The cases α=0, constant P, P=0, and u=0 follow from the same formulas. No choice axiom is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources