How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every nonzero vector has a norming functional
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a normed space over or , and let be nonzero. Then there exists such that
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, A normed space over or and a vector with .
AC is used through real or complex extension [L2] or [L3] in steps 2.1 and 2.2.
The dual space is the space of bounded linear functionals on (The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm).
In the real case, a bounded linear functional extends with the same norm (A bounded real linear functional on a subspace of a real normed space extends with the same norm).
In the complex case, a bounded linear functional extends with the same norm (A bounded complex linear functional on a subspace of a complex normed space extends with the same norm).
Proof
Let . Define or by Because , each vector of has a unique representation . Moreover, so is bounded and .
If the scalar field is , [L2] extends to a bounded real linear functional on with . Since , .
If the scalar field is , [L3] extends to a bounded complex linear functional on with . Again .
In either scalar case, the extension produced in step 2.1 or step 2.2 is a bounded linear functional on , hence an element of by [L1], with norm and value at .