Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular RN crossings and local bifurcation extension

Statement

Let M>0, Q2=qe2+qm2>0, and M2≥Q2 in the selected ingoing RN model Selected ingoing RN extension and time orientation. Every positive root rH of f is a regular crossing: the metric is nondegenerate and the two-form is smooth there. If M2>Q2, set r+=M+M2−Q2,κ:=12f′(r+)>0. For every auxiliary length ℓ∗>0, there is a smooth local extension chart on (−ε,ε)2×S2 with dimensionless coordinates U,V and UV=−K(r),K(r):=r−r+ℓ∗e2κh(r),K′(r+)=ℓ∗−1, where h is smooth. The metric and two-form have smooth coefficients on the whole chart, including both null axes. The sphere U=V=0 is a regular bifurcation sphere: the extended Killing field ∂v vanishes there. On the dense set UV≠0, the source-free RN equations of the current Full dyonic Reissner-Nordström electrovac verification draft apply; their residual tensors therefore vanish on the axes as well, conditionally on that exact draft interface and its proof status. At extremality M2=Q2, the ingoing chart remains regular at rH=M, but the simple-root construction is not asserted because κ=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M>0, Q2>0, M2≥Q2, the selected ingoing RN data, and a fixed ℓ∗>0 with units of length.

[F1]

Selected ingoing RN extension and time orientation: the v,r metric block has determinant −1, its global two-form is smooth for r>0, and the time orientation is selected by N=∂v+(f/2−1)∂r.

[F2]

Explicit rational and real power regimes: for a positive real x, x1/2 is the unique positive square root; at x=0 the rational regime sets 01/2=0. This current batch-2 definition is draft material, used only for that exact real-root convention.

[F3]

Choice-free smooth inverse function theorem in Euclidean space: a smooth map between open Euclidean sets whose derivative is invertible at a point has a smooth local inverse.

[F4]

The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive: if an integrand is continuous, its oriented integral from a fixed endpoint is differentiable with derivative equal to the integrand.

[F5]

Killing fields of a Lorentzian metric: a smooth vector field is Killing when its Lie derivative of the metric vanishes.

[L1]

Full dyonic Reissner-Nordström electrovac verification: its current draft states dF=d(⋆gF)=0 and Ric⁡=2Q(F) on each static RN component with f≠0. The geometric statement is used conditionally on that exact interface; the carrier and its typed foundation chain remain draft and have not received independent acceptance. Its separate formal SI normalization is not used here.

[A1]

The auxiliary ℓ∗ sets the coordinate scale only. In the subextremal case choose the local radial interval to exclude the inner root.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

In the ingoing chart the v,r block is (−f110), with determinant −1 for every r>0. Its inverse is (011f), so the block has one positive and one negative eigenvalue. The sphere block r2γ is positive definite, and the two-form in [F1] is smooth. Therefore every positive root is a regular crossing without using a static coordinate at that root.

1.2F2F4A1algebraconstruct

Assume M2>Q2. Put s=M2−Q2. Since Q2>0, s2=M2−Q2<M2 and s,M≥0, so s<M and r−=M−s>0. Set r+=M+s, d=r+−r−>0, and x=r−r+. Then f(r)=(r−r+)(r−r−)r2=xb(r),b(r):=r−r−r2,2κ=b(r+)=dr+2>0. The explicit algebraic factorization 2κ−b(r)=(r−r+)(dr−r+r−)r+2r2 shows that p(r):=1f(r)−12κ(r−r+)=dr−r+r−2κr+2(r−r−) is smooth near r+ after shrinking the interval so r−r−≠0. Define h(r):=∫r+rp(s) ds. By [F4], h′=p; repeated differentiation of this identity shows h is smooth, and h(r+)=0.

2.1F3step 1.2algebra

Define K(r):=r−r+ℓ∗e2κh(r). It is smooth and K′(r+)=ℓ∗−1>0. By [F3], it has a smooth local inverse r=ρ(z) near z=0. After shrinking again, K′(r)>0 and f(r)K′(r)K(r)=2κ(r≠r+), which follows by differentiating K and using the definition of h. The identity extends in the equivalent form fK′=2κK to r=r+.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

For the original ingoing region define V=eκv and U=−K(r)e−κv. The Jacobian of (v,r)↦(U,V) is κK′(r)>0, so this is a smooth local coordinate change across the future crossing. Since UV=−K(r), the inverse radial coordinate is r=ρ(−UV). Differentiation gives dv=dVκV,dr=−VK′(r)dU−UK′(r)dV. Substitute these in −f dv2+2 dv dr; the dV2 coefficient cancels by fK′=2κK and K=−UV, leaving −1κK′(ρ(−UV))(dU⊗dV+dV⊗dU). This coefficient is smooth and nonzero at U=V=0. The sphere term ρ(−UV)2γ is smooth and positive definite, so the radial block retains Lorentz signature throughout a small rectangle. To make this a local extension chart, choose ε>0 so ρ(−UV)>0 for (U,V)∈(−ε,ε)2. The original ingoing model maps the open subset whose image satisfies V>0, ∣U∣,∣V∣<ε smoothly and bijectively onto that open half-rectangle, by the nonzero Jacobian above. Adjoin the full rectangle and identify that half with the old subset. A sequence in the overlap tending inside the new rectangle but outside the half-rectangle can only approach V=0; there v=κ−1log⁡V tends to −∞, so it has no limit at any finite old point. The other edges lie outside the open rectangle. Thus the local gluing separates the new points from all old points, and the displayed coordinates and metric give a smooth Hausdorff local extension.

4.1F1F5step 3.1algebra

The electric two-form transforms as −qer2dv∧dr=−qeκr2K′(r)dU∧dV, whose coefficient is smooth because r+>0, κ>0, and K′(r+)>0; qmω is unchanged. Since dv∧dr=(κK′(r))−1dU∧dV with positive coefficient, the product orientation extends as dU∧dV∧ω. Thus the two-form extends smoothly over both axes. The vector field transforms to ∂v=κ(V∂V−U∂U). The extended metric coefficients depend only on UV, which is invariant under this vector field; also L∂vdU=−κdU and L∂vdV=κdV, so the radial metric tensor is invariant. By [F5] the extended field is Killing. It vanishes at U=V=0, where the induced sphere metric is r+2γ. Each null axis is a smooth null hypersurface: on U=0 its generator has covector −V/K′(r+) dU, and on V=0 it has covector U/K′(r+) dV. Thus the Killing field is tangent, null and normal, nonzero away from the common sphere; that portion is nonempty and dense on each axis. The axes meet precisely at the spacelike sphere where the extended field vanishes.

5.1F1L1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra

On each quadrant UV≠0, define t:=12κlog⁡∣VU∣,r=ρ(−UV). These are smooth coordinates there: r=ρ(−UV) and the logarithmic ratio independently determine the product and quotient of the nonzero coordinates, so their Jacobian is nonzero. Differentiating gives dr=−V dU+U dVK′(r),dt=12κ(dVV−dUU),dt∧dr=1κK′(r)dU∧dV. Put α=dU/U and η=dV/V. Since UV=−K(r), the displayed differentials give dr=(K/K′)(α+η) and dt=(η−α)/(2κ). Substituting in the static radial metric −fdt2+f−1dr2 of [F1], and using fK′=2κK from step 2.1, the α⊗α and η⊗η coefficients cancel and each cross coefficient is f/(2κ2)=K/(κK′). Therefore the radial tensor is KκK′(α⊗η+η⊗α)=−1κK′(dU⊗dV+dV⊗dU), using K=−UV. The sphere term remains r2γ. The two-form satisfies −qer−2dt∧dr+qmω=−qe(κr2K′)−1dU∧dV+qmω, exactly its expression from step 4.1. Thus each quadrant is a static RN chart with f≠0. Since κK′(r)>0, its orientation agrees with dt∧dr∧ω. The exact static-domain interface [L1] makes the geometric Einstein and Maxwell residuals vanish on all four quadrants. The metric, field and inverse metric are smooth on the full extension chart, so the residual tensors are continuous; a continuous tensor vanishing on a dense subset vanishes on its closure. This proves the stated conditional equation extension to both axes and the bifurcation sphere.

6.1F1givenstep 1.1step 1.2step 3.1algebra∎

If M2=Q2, then rH=M and f(r)=(1−M/r)2. The determinant and smooth field in [F1] remain regular there and f′(M)=0, so κ=0. The construction in steps 1.2-3.1 requires κ>0 and makes no extremal bifurcation-chart claim.

Remarks

The smooth crossing and local chart are properties of the specified ingoing model. The field-equation extension remains conditional on the current RN verification draft and its unresolved upstream proof status; no maximality or uniqueness statement follows.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources