How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let be an -module. The following are equivalent:
- is flat.
- For every injection , the induced map is injective.
- For every ideal , the multiplication map , , is injective.
- The map in claim 3 is injective for every finitely generated ideal .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and an -module .
Flatness means that preserves exact sequences (Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms).
Tensoring is right exact (Tensoring is right exact).
Tensor products commute with direct sums and ; consequently (Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums, The regular module is a tensor unit: and ).
A finite list in a module determines a homomorphism taking to ; if the list generates , this map is surjective. Also (The free module on a set and its standard basis, Universal property of the free module on a set).
In a commutative ring, every submodule of the regular module is an ideal (Left, right and two-sided ideals).
A tensor product is the quotient of the free -module on pairs by the subgroup generated by the additive and balance relations (The tensor product from the additive group underlying the free -module on , elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums). Consequently, a tensor expression and a derivation that it is zero involve only finitely many generators and defining relations.
Proof
Claim 1 implies claim 2 by applying [L1] to ; claim 2 implies claim 3 by taking the inclusion and using ; claim 3 implies claim 4 by restriction to finitely generated ideals.
Assume claim 4. Claim 3 follows: an element is represented by finitely many coefficients from , hence comes from for the finitely generated ideal they generate; if its image in is zero, injectivity for makes its representative zero, so .
Let be injective and let map to zero. By [L6], the tensor uses finitely many elements of , and a derivation of its zero image uses only finitely many generators and defining relations in . Hence there are finitely generated submodules and with for which comes from an element killed in .
Under claim 3, for every submodule , the map is injective, by induction on . For it is the unique map ; for it is claim 3 by [L5].
Present using [L4], and let be the inverse image of . Right exactness identifies with and with the quotient of by .
For the induction step, let , put , and let be the image of in . Tensoring the exact rows and gives right-exact rows by [L2]; the left and right vertical maps are injective by the case and the induction hypothesis from step 2.1.
If maps to zero in , its image in maps to zero in and hence is zero by the right vertical injection in step 3.1. Right exactness of the top row lifts from some . The image of in maps to the zero image of in ; the left vertical injection in step 3.1 makes , and therefore . This completes the induction of step 2.1.
By step 4.1, both and inject into . Therefore the induced map of the quotients in step 2.2 is injective, so . This proves claim 2 from claim 4.
Finally claim 2 and right exactness [L2] imply claim 1: for an exact sequence, replace the left map by the injection of its image into the middle term; tensoring preserves that injection by claim 2 and preserves the remaining image and cokernel statements by right exactness.
Steps 1.1 through 6.1 prove the cycle of equivalences. The zero ideal, , and zero module cases occur explicitly in steps 1.2 and 2.1; no choice is made, and both directions of every equivalence have been supplied.
Depends on
Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms
Tensoring is right exact
Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums
The regular module is a tensor unit: and
The free module on a set and its standard basis
Universal property of the free module on a set
Left, right and two-sided ideals
The tensor product from the additive group underlying the free -module on , elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums