Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local evolution for a strict barotropic perfect fluid: smooth constrained data admit a development, unique up to a data-fixing isometry

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). Fix Λ∈R, κ>0 and one smooth EOS p=p(ϵ) on an open interval J with ϵ+p>0 and 0<p′(ϵ)<1 (The perfect-fluid matter model: rest energy density, pressure, four-velocity and stress-energy). Let Σ be a smooth three-manifold with smooth metric h, symmetric tensor K2, density ϵ0:Σ→J and tangent field v0 with h(v0,v0)<1. These specify the future unit initial velocity U0=W0(N+v0),W0=(1−h(v0,v0))−1/2 in V=RN⊕TΣ, with metric g0(aN+X,bN+Y)=−ab+h(X,Y). Require the constraints of Gauss-Codazzi decomposition in Gaussian normal coordinates and the constraint equations in terms of the induced metric and second fundamental form for T0=(ϵ0+p(ϵ0))U0♭g0⊗U0♭g0+p(ϵ0)g0. Then a smooth time-oriented local development has metric g, density ϵ and future unit fluid velocity u satisfying Gab+Λgab=κ[(ϵ+p)uaub+pgab],Dϵ+(ϵ+p)ϑ=0,(ϵ+p)ab+Πba∂ap=0. Here D=∇u, ϑ=∇aua, a=∇uu and Πab=gab+uaub. Initial geometric data are (h,K2) and initial matter data are (ϵ0,U0) under N↦n, X↦i∗X. Arbitrary smooth subluminal tilt is allowed. The initial surface lies in the interior of its intrinsic domain of dependence; its interior Cauchy neighborhood is globally hyperbolic. Any two developments of this same EOS and complete data agree near the entire initial surface by a data-fixing future isometry matching density and velocity. The neighborhood may have position-dependent time width; shocks, vacuum boundaries and vanishing sound speed are outside this strict interior-fluid statement (Local geometric development for a fixed covariant Einstein-matter model with complete constrained data).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable and Dependent Choice, fixed constants and EOS, and smooth complete constrained data including the abstract bundle velocity.

[L1]

Fix an enthalpy integration reference as in The barotropic enthalpy variable r(epsilon): definition, strict monotonicity and the symmetric form of the fluid equations. The actual coordinate symmetrizer, smooth hyperboloid velocity reconstruction, initialization and matter recovery/conservation on the reduced solution are supplied by The barotropic fluid equations in enthalpy form are symmetric hyperbolic with positive principal symbol. The fluid conservation identity is Divergence-free dust is exactly the dust system, and divergence-free perfect fluid is exactly the fluid equations.

[L2]

The fixed-model development theorem supplies the complete harmonic metric jet, reduced existence, normal constraint recovery, normal-collar patching, intrinsic Cauchy neighborhood and complete-data isometry uniqueness (Local geometric development for a fixed covariant Einstein-matter model with complete constrained data). The special metric jet in Harmonic initial data from geometric data: prescribing the metric jet of a spacelike slice in a time-independent background uses comparison metric −dt2+h, rather than the flat comparison employed for this initializer.

Proof

1.1givenL1L2L3algebra

(Full fluid contract.) In the initially orthogonal metric gauge, U0 gives u0=W0 and ui=W0v0i. Thus (r(ϵ0),u0i) initializes every independent fluid variable in [L1]'s reduction, while its positive-branch reconstruction enforces unit future normalization. That supplier gives smooth symmetric coefficients and positivity for the initial timelike conormal, and proves full fluid recovery and conserved stress on the reduced metric before Einstein recovery. Together with [L2]'s complete metric jet and [L3]'s constraints, every fixed-model hypothesis of [L2] holds.

2.1step 1.1L2∎

(Development and comparison.) Apply [L2]. The resulting full solution has exactly the stated geometric and bundle matter data and satisfies the displayed Einstein-fluid equations. Its normal-collar patching and intrinsic Cauchy restriction give the claimed neighborhood and causal properties. Uniqueness uses the same EOS and full density/velocity data and yields a future data-fixing isometry matching both fields. No vanishing-sound-speed branch has been inferred.

Remarks

A timelike initial velocity is specified in the abstract Lorentz bundle over the Riemannian surface; it is not an intrinsic timelike vector of its tangent bundle. No small-tilt restriction or uniform noncompact width is required.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources