How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gram–Schmidt turns every finite independent list into an orthonormal list with the same successive spans
Statement
Let be a finite linearly independent list in a real or complex inner product space. There is an orthonormal list such that, for every ,
It is obtained recursively from
For , both lists are empty.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite linearly independent list .
An orthonormal list is orthogonal and every listed vector has norm one (Orthogonal vectors and subspaces, orthogonal and orthonormal sets, and orthonormal bases).
A finite list is linearly independent when every list of scalars with has for all (Linear independence: a finite list is independent when forces every , and a subset is independent when every injective finite list into is independent).
For a nonzero vector , positive definiteness gives , so is defined and has norm one (The norm induced by a real or complex inner product).
Every finite orthogonal list of nonzero vectors is linearly independent (Every finite orthogonal list of nonzero vectors is linearly independent).
The span of a set is exactly the vectors obtained as finite linear combinations of its elements, including the empty combination. For a finite list, grouping the finitely many terms by their listed vectors gives a coefficient combination indexed by the list. Every subspace containing those vectors contains these combinations. ( is exactly the set of linear combinations of finite lists of elements of , and )
Proof
For there is nothing to construct, and the successive-span assertion at is equality of zero subspaces.
Suppose have been constructed orthonormally with the required span equalities. Define by the displayed formula. For , linearity and orthonormality give .
If , then lies in , say ; then the scalars for , and for satisfy with , contradicting the independence of through [L2]. Hence , and [L3] makes a unit vector orthogonal to its predecessors.
The formula for shows lies in , while its rearrangement shows lies in . Together with the induction hypothesis these give both inclusions in the span equality at .
Induction constructs the stated list and proves every successive-span equality. Its vectors are nonzero and orthogonal, so [L4] also confirms their independence; their unit norms make the list orthonormal.
Depends on
Orthogonal vectors and subspaces, orthogonal and orthonormal sets, and orthonormal bases
Every finite orthogonal list of nonzero vectors is linearly independent
The norm induced by a real or complex inner product
Linear independence: a finite list is independent when forces every , and a subset is independent when every injective finite list into is independent
is exactly the set of linear combinations of finite lists of elements of , and