Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Wendl generic regularity for somewhere-injective closed curves

Statement

Assume the full Axiom of Choice. Let (M,ω) be a symplectic manifold without boundary, let U⊂M be open with compact closure, and fix an ω-compatible almost-complex structure Jfix. In the space of ω-compatible almost-complex structures equal to Jfix off U, a residual subset has the property that, for each J in it, the moduli space of closed J-holomorphic curves with an injective point mapping into U is a smooth finite-dimensional manifold. Here an injective point is a point z with duz≠0 and u−1(u(z))={z}. For dim⁡RM=2n, its genus-g, m-marked, class-A locus has dimension (n−3)(2−2g)+2⟨c1(TM,J),A⟩+2m. If M is compact, one may take U=M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC and the entire original symplectic, perturbation-region and compatible-structure data in the Statement. Put JU={J:J is smooth and compatible, J=Jfix off U} with its smooth compact-open topology. Curves are connected closed smooth Riemann surfaces with maps, modulo orientation-preserving biholomorphic reparametrizations, with ordered distinct smooth markings in the marked locus. Distances to an empty complement are interpreted as infinity.

[F1]

Compatible structures have the metric gJ(v,w)=ω(v,Jw); their infinitesimal variations satisfy YJ+JY=0 and are gJ-symmetric. Symplectic and almost-complex curve data

[F2]

The actual arbitrary-genus vector Cauchy–Riemann operator has real index 2n(1−g)+2c1(A), closed range, smooth adjoint annihilators with unique continuation, and the exact higher-range and finite-augmentation properties. Closed-surface real Cauchy–Riemann index and smooth adjoint obstructions

[F3]

Concrete local domain/map quotient charts include nonstable domains, subtract a map-normalization directions and add b domain directions, with b−a=6g−6. They are smooth when the full universal derivative is onto. Countably many compact smooth-slice pieces with quantitative injectivity and first-derivative/image bounds cover all curves in question and are sequentially compact for smoothly converging J. Local domain slices and a countable compact exhaustion for simple closed curves

[F4]

The arbitrary-Banach inverse and implicit theorems give the local zero charts after the derivative is restricted to its kernel complement, as explicitly implemented in [F3]. Sard–Smale gives residual regular values for a smooth Fredholm projection between countable-base Banach manifolds; finite-dimensional manifolds are included. Inverse function theorem for Banach spaces Implicit function theorem for Banach spaces Sard--Smale residual regular values for Fredholm maps Fredholm maps and regular values on countable-base Banach manifolds

Proof

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

We first verify the compatible-variation pointwise argument. In a Hermitian symplectic vector space, identify J with i using a unitary basis. A gJ-symmetric real map anticommuting with i has the form Yz=Azˉ with AT=A. Given v≠0 and any w, choose a unitary basis with v=re1, r>0, set the first column of A to w/r, its first row to the transpose of that column, and its other entries to zero. Then Yv=w. This also verifies the tangent constraints in [F1] directly. A smooth unitary frame on a target coordinate ball extends any such value to a smooth compatible tangent variation; multiply by a nonnegative smooth bump supported in that ball, and extend by zero.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1constructalgebra

Let u:(Σ,j)→(M,J) have an injective point in U, and let P=Du on unrestricted H1 map sections. The derivative of 12(du+Jduj) in the target-structure direction is K(Y)=12Y(u)duj. By [F2], P(H1)+{K(Y):Y smooth, supported in U} is closed. A nonzero L2 annihilator would be a smooth adjoint section η with unique continuation. The injective-point set is open by [F3], so it contains a point p where η(p)≠0. Choose a source unit vector e and set v=dup(je)≠0. Step 1.1 gives Y whose value sends v to the nonzero form coefficient ηp(e), producing a strictly positive real pairing at p. Shrink the target ball around u(p) until its entire preimage lies in the embedded source neighborhood and the pairing stays positive there before applying the bump. This is possible because the compact complement has image separated from u(p). The bumped pairing vanishes elsewhere and has positive integral, contradicting annihilation. Thus the augmented range is all L2. Since the fixed-operator cokernel is finite dimensional, finitely many such smooth variations Y1,…,YN already span its quotient; [F2] gives surjectivity and a bounded right inverse at every higher Sobolev level for this finite augmentation.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1constructalgebra

These are derivatives of actual compatible structures with the prescribed support. Put Y(t)=∑tνYν, B(t)=12JY(t), S(t)=exp⁡B(t) and Jt=S(t)JS(t)−1. The symmetric anticommuting tangent conditions imply B(t) is infinitesimally symplectic, so S(t) is symplectic and Jt compatible. Moreover [12JY,J]=Y, hence dJt∣0=Y(t), and Jt=J off U. This is a finite smooth family arbitrarily close to J in ALL prescribed finitely many smooth seminorms when t is small. In [F3]'s source/map slices, the universal derivative remains onto: adding domain directions cannot reduce the range, and the removed a directions are du(Vj)⊂ker⁡Du, since reparametrization by a holomorphic flow preserves the equation. Thus [F2] and [F3] give an actual smooth finite-dimensional universal zero manifold.

4.1F2F3F4step 3.1constructalgebra

At such a universal zero, write Dx for the vertical derivative in domain/map slice variables and Dt for the finite perturbation derivative. Surjectivity of (Dx,Dt) makes the map t↦[Dtt] onto coker⁡Dx. A vector t lifts to the tangent kernel exactly if Dxx=−Dtt is soluble. Therefore the cokernel of the derivative of the zero-manifold projection to RN is precisely coker⁡Dx. Regular values of the projection give precisely regular fixed-Jt curves. This projection is smooth Fredholm of index I=2n(1−g)+2c1(A)+b−a between finite-dimensional, hence countable-base, manifolds. Apply [F4], taking a countable chart cover if only an open collection of universal charts is under consideration.

5.1F2F3step 4.1algebra

For each compact exhaustion family Cℓ(J) from [F3], let Gℓ be the set of structures for which every curve in that family is regular in its domain/map quotient chart. This set is open: if Ji→J and irregular curves belonged to Cℓ(Ji), [F3] would give a smoothly convergent subsequence to a curve in Cℓ(J). Surjectivity of its Fredholm derivative is open in operator norm, because a bounded right inverse persists by a Neumann series. The concrete local charts identify the nearby derivatives continuously. Hence regularity at the limit rules out that sequence.

5.2F2F3F4step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1constructalgebra

The same Gℓ is dense. Fix J0 and any smooth neighborhood of it. The family Cℓ(J0) is compact. At each of its curves choose the finite perturbations of step 2.1; finitely many chart neighborhoods cover it, so their finite union gives one finite list of perturbations and the family in step 3.1. Onto derivatives persist near all those curves. For all sufficiently small t, EVERY curve of Cℓ(Jt) lies in that union: otherwise a sequence t→0 of counterexamples would converge by [F3] into Cℓ(J0), a contradiction. The universal zero sets in that open union have the smooth projection of step 4.1. Choose a regular t arbitrarily near zero by [F4]; then Jt∈Gℓ and lies in the prescribed smooth neighborhood. If Cℓ(J0) is empty, the same compactness argument gives an empty family for all nearby structures and density is immediate there.

6.1F3F5step 5.1step 5.2constructalgebra

The structure space JU is locally Baire. A compatible Cayley chart identifies it locally with an open set in the Fréchet space of smooth symmetric anticommuting sections on M vanishing off U. This is a closed subspace of the complete metrizable global smooth section space (use a countable compact target exhaustion and its derivative seminorms), hence complete; compact U‾ makes positivity of the Cayley chart an open C0 condition. [F5] applies in each such chart. Intersect the open dense sets Gℓ over the countably many source slices, compact parameter pieces, derivative/injectivity bounds, image-exhaustion pieces and genera. The resulting residual set is dense locally in each structure chart and therefore in JU. Every curve with an injective point in U belongs to one of these families by [F3], so every such curve is regular. No countability assertion about the homology group of a noncompact target is needed: all classes already occur in the countable map/domain chart exhaustion.

7.1F1F2F3step 4.1step 6.1constructalgebra∎

The regular zero charts from [F3] are finite-dimensional manifold charts on the unparametrized moduli, with smooth transitions and trivial isotropy. Their dimension is I of step 4.1. Adding m distinct ordered markings is the open configuration space in the m-fold fiber product of the smooth universal source surface, of real fiber dimension 2m; chart transitions are the same smooth biholomorphisms from [F3]. Thus the genus-g, class-A, m-marked dimension is 2n(1−g)+2c1(A)+6g−6+2m=(n−3)(2−2g)+2c1(A)+2m. A negative expected dimension has no regular zero, as its tangent kernel cannot have negative dimension. For compact M, U=M is allowed. If there is no injective point in the selected region the moduli is empty and all assertions are vacuous. This proves the full Statement, with no compactification, multiple-cover, boundary or gluing claim.

Proof status

Complete local reconstruction conditional only on the actual proved suppliers listed above. The two new local lemmas prove the former missing vector index/adjoint and nonstable-domain/exhaustion interfaces. Their exact source-context adoption and independent review remain owner decisions; no VFC, varying-domain degeneration or gluing theorem is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources