How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
Statement
Let be a measure space, let be conjugate exponents, and let be measurable real-valued functions.
- If and with and , then
- If and with and , then
- If and with and , then
In every case the right-hand side is finite, so is integrable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A measure space , conjugate exponents , and measurable real-valued functions in the spaces named in the relevant clause of the Statement.
Conjugate exponents are defined in Conjugate exponents, including the endpoint conventions.
For , membership in means , while means finite essential supremum (The function space for , The space of essentially bounded measurable functions).
A nonnegative measurable function has integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere (A nonnegative measurable function has integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere).
If , then almost everywhere (The essential supremum is attained as the least essential bound).
Young's inequality says for when are conjugate (Young's inequality for conjugate real exponents).
The nonnegative integral is monotone and homogeneous (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
The nonnegative integral is additive (Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral).
The integral of a nonnegative function over a null set is zero (A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes).
Proof
Assume first , and put and . If or , then the corresponding power integral is , so [L3] makes the corresponding function vanish outside a measurable null set. By [L8], . Thus only the case remains.
For the endpoint pair , let . By [L4] there is a measurable null set outside which . On , [L8] gives zero integral for and . Integrating the inequality on with [L6] and [L7] therefore gives .
In the remaining strict-exponent case, Young's inequality applied pointwise to and gives [step 1.1, L1, L2, L5, L6, L7, algebra] Integrating and using additivity, monotonicity, homogeneity, and the definitions of and yields
The case is identical after exchanging and . [step 1.2, given]
Step 2.1 proves the strict-exponent case, and steps 1.2 and 2.2 prove the two endpoint cases. In every case the right-hand side is finite by [L2], so is integrable.
Depends on
Conjugate exponents, including the endpoint conventions
The function space for
The space of essentially bounded measurable functions
The essential supremum is attained as the least essential bound
A nonnegative measurable function has integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere
Young's inequality for conjugate real exponents
Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
Monotone convergence for the integral
Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral
A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes