How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homotopy invariance of vector-bundle pullback
Statement
Assume AC. Let be paracompact Hausdorff and let be a homotopy from to . For every numerable finite-rank real or complex vector bundle , the endpoint pullbacks and are isomorphic. Equivalently, the restrictions of to and are isomorphic. No canonical endpoint isomorphism is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, as in the statement, and .
Pullback charts make a vector bundle, and its endpoint restrictions are and (Pullback vector bundles and sections).
Under AC and DC a paracompact Hausdorff open cover admits a subordinate locally finite partition (Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity).
The countabilization in the proof of Numerable principal bundles are classified by maps to BG turns an arbitrary numeration into a countable partition such that each cozero set is a disjoint union of open pieces subordinate to the original cover.
AC is the stated principle and implies DC (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies the dependent-choice instances used in vector-bundle constructions).
Proof
For each , compactness of gives a partition and neighborhoods of such that is trivial on . After shrinking to , modify each later strip trivialization by its transition matrix at the common endpoint; consecutive trivializations then agree there and paste. Thus is trivial.
Apply [A1] and [F2] to the cover . Apply the countabilization [F3] to obtain a countable open cover and a locally finite partition with , where each is a disjoint union of open sets contained in members of the original cover. Pasting the corresponding trivializations over those disjoint pieces makes trivial.
Put , , and let be the graph of . Over , its chosen trivialization transports a vector vertically from to . Outside the two graph points agree, so extending by the identity gives a continuous bundle isomorphism .
Near any , choose so every with vanishes there. On that neighborhood , and carries the restriction over the graph of to the graph of . Enlarging does not change this map locally because the added are identities. These local formulas therefore define a continuous fiberwise-linear isomorphism . Reversing the finite local composites gives its continuous inverse.
By [F1] the two endpoint restrictions are precisely and , so step 4.1 proves the assertion. AC was used in step 2.1 to supply DC and countabilize the arbitrary partition; the finite strip constructions are choice-free once their data are supplied. Different partitions and charts can give different endpoint maps, which is why no canonical isomorphism is claimed.
Depends on
Pullback vector bundles and sections
Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity
AC supplies the dependent-choice instances used in vector-bundle constructions
Numerable principal bundles are classified by maps to BG
The Axiom of Choice