Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Line integrals under reversal and concatenation

Statement

Let γ be a piecewise-C1 path, and let f be a continuous scalar field and F a continuous vector field on a set containing its trace. Then

∫γ−f ds=∫γf ds,∫γ−F⋅dr=−∫γF⋅dr.

If piecewise-C1 paths α,β:[0,1]→Rn satisfy α(1)=β(0), and f and F are continuous on a set containing both traces, then

∫α∗βf ds=∫αf ds+∫βf ds, ∫α∗βF⋅dr=∫αF⋅dr+∫βF⋅dr.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The paths and fields in the Statement.

[L1]

Reversal is γ−(t)=γ(a+b−t), and concatenation uses α(2t) and β(2t−1) on the two halves of [0,1] (Reversal, concatenation, closed paths, and oriented piecewise-C1 reparametrizations).

[L2]

Scalar line integrals are unchanged by oriented reparametrization; vector line integrals are unchanged under preservation and negated under reversal (Scalar line integrals are parametrization-independent; vector line integrals retain orientation and change sign when it reverses).

[L3]

Line-integral sums are independent of the admissible partition (The piecewise-C1 line-integral sums do not depend on the admissible partition).

[L5]

Scalar and vector line integrals are sums of their defining one-variable integrals over smooth pieces (Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2L5algebra

If a=b, [L5] makes the two line integrals over both γ and γ− zero. If a<b, the affine map t↦a+b−t is orientation-reversing, so applying [L2] to the reversal in [L1] proves the two formulas.

1.2L1algebra

Split the concatenation at 1/2. The first half is the orientation-preserving affine reparametrization t↦2t of α, and the second is the orientation-preserving affine reparametrization t↦2t−1 of β.

2.1step 1.2L2L3L4L5

By [L2], each half-integral in step 1.2 equals the corresponding integral over α or β. By [L3], [L4], and [L5], the sum of the two half-integrals is the integral over α∗β. This proves both concatenation formulas.

3.1L1L5algebra∎

The join point is an allowed partition point, so no derivative match is required there. If either path is constant, its derivative and both of its line-integral contributions are zero, and the formulas remain valid.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources