Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Mellin incoming and outgoing propagation

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H0=−Δ on L2(R3;C), with domain H2(R3), and let U(s)ψ(x):=e−3s/2ψ(e−sx)(s∈R) be the unitary dilation group. Use the convention U(s)=e−isD. Then:

(a) U is strongly continuous and its self-adjoint generator D has Dψ=−i(x⋅∇+3/2)ψ on the core Cc∞(R3). The unitary position-log map Txψ(ρ,ω)=e3ρ/2ψ(eρω) takes D to −i∂ρ on L2(R×S2,dρ dσ), with domain consisting of functions whose weak ρ derivative belongs to L2. The unitary transform Gu(η,ω)=(2π)−1/2∫Re−iηρu(ρ,ω) dρ takes this operator to multiplication by η. In momentum-log coordinates the sign reverses: if Fpψ(p)=(2π)−3/2∫e−ip⋅xψ(x) dx and W=GTpFp, with Tp given by the same polar-log formula, then WDW∗=M−η, on {h:ηh∈L2}.

(b) With P±:=1(0,∞)(±D) (Projection valued measure) one has P++P−=I. In the W representation these are multiplication by 1η<0 and 1η>0, respectively; the spectral projection of D at 0 vanishes.

(c) For every f∈Cc∞((0,∞)) with supp⁡f⊆(a2,b2), 0<a<b, and every nonnegative integer N, there is CN such that ∥1{∣x∣<2at}e−itH0f(H0)P+∥≤CNt(1+t)−N(t≥1), ∥1{∣x∣<2a∣t∣}e−itH0f(H0)P−∥≤CN∣t∣(1+∣t∣)−N(t≤−1). Consequently P+f(H0)e−itH0→0 strongly as t→−∞ and P−f(H0)e−itH0→0 strongly as t→+∞. The bounds also hold for any integer N<0 after enlarging its constant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice; H0=−Δ on H2(R3); the dilation maps U(s); a complex-valued smooth cutoff f compactly supported in (a2,b2), 0<a<b. The measure dσ is ordinary surface area on S2, and all operator norms are on complex L2.

[F1]

Plancherel is a unitary transformation for both the three-dimensional momentum Fourier convention Fp and the one-dimensional convention G above (obtained from the 2π convention by unitary rescaling). Fourier transformation takes −Δ to multiplication by ∣p∣2, so e−itH0f(H0)=Fp∗Me−it∣p∣2f(∣p∣2)Fp. The multiplier's norm is at most ∥f∥∞ (Plancherel theorem, Schwartz space and its seminorms).

[F2]

The spectral PVM of a real multiplication operator acts by indicator multiplication: E(B)h=1η∈Bh for Borel B. These countably additive projections and their multiplier integrals are explicit, so no general spectral-existence or Stone theorem is invoked (Projection valued measure).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The change of variables y=e−sx gives ∥U(s)ψ∥2=∥ψ∥2, and U(s)U(r)=U(s+r), U(s)−1=U(−s). Polar coordinates give dx=e3ρdρ dσ(ω), hence Tx and Tp are unitary, with inverse u↦[ψ(rω)=r−3/2u(log⁡r,ω)] for r>0; the omitted origin has measure zero. Direct substitution gives TxU(s)Tx∗u(ρ,ω)=u(ρ−s,ω) and GTxU(s)Tx∗G∗h=e−isηh. Dominated convergence for ∣(e−isη−1)h∣2≤4∣h∣2 proves strong continuity. Multiplication by the real coordinate η is self-adjoint on {h:ηh∈L2}: if h belongs to its adjoint domain with adjoint value k, testing against arbitrary L2 functions supported where ∣η∣≤m gives k=ηh there, and exhaustion over integers m gives the exact multiplier domain. For ηh∈L2, dominated convergence using ∣(e−isη−1)/s∣≤∣η∣ gives the derivative −iηh at zero. Conversely, if the difference quotients converge in L2, their norms are bounded; Fatou applied to their pointwise limit −iηh gives ηh∈L2, so this is the exact generator domain. Thus D=Tx∗G∗MηGTx is the generator in the declared convention. Fourier differentiation identifies its log domain with {u:∂ρu∈L2} and its action with −i∂ρ, where the derivative is weak.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

Smooth functions compactly supported in ρ, with smooth angular dependence, are dense for the norm ∥u∥2+∥∂ρu∥2: first multiply by χ(ρ/m) for a fixed smooth cutoff χ=1 near zero; the derivative error from the cutoff is bounded by ∥χ′∥∞∥u∥2/m, and the two tail errors tend to zero. Next convolve in ρ with a compactly supported smooth approximate identity, which converges in L2 for both u and its weak derivative; finally smooth the angular variable in a finite smooth coordinate cover of the sphere with a partition of unity. This angular smoothing converges in both norms because it acts only in ω and commutes with ∂ρ. Each resulting inverse Tx image belongs to Cc∞(R3∖{0}). These images therefore form a graph core. Every ψ∈Cc∞(R3) also has Txψ and ∂ρTxψ in L2, by the polar change of variables, and differentiation gives Tx∗(−i∂ρ)Txψ=−i(x⋅∇+3/2)ψ. The larger space Cc∞(R3) is consequently a core as well. Countable approximation sequences suffice for these density arguments.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2algebra

Changing variables in the momentum Fourier integral gives FpU(s)Fp∗ϕ(p)=e3s/2ϕ(esp). Its momentum-log action is u(ρ,ω)↦u(ρ+s,ω), so WU(s)W∗=Meisη and WDW∗=M−η, with the multiplier domain stated in (a). Equivalently Fourier conjugation gives +i(p⋅∇p+3/2) on smooth vectors, while the position action in step 2.1 has the opposite sign. By the multiplication PVM, WP+W∗=M1η<0 and WP−W∗=M1η>0. The set {0}×S2 has product measure zero, so the zero projection vanishes and P++P−=I.

4.1step 3.1F1algebra

For t≥1 set χt=1{∣x∣<2at}. On the dense set of h(η,ω) smooth in both variables and compactly supported in η, substitute G∗h into Tp∗ and then into the inverse momentum Fourier integral. The polar Jacobian e3ρ combines with e−3ρ/2 from Tp∗ to give the amplitude A(ρ)=f(e2ρ)e3ρ/2. All integrals are absolutely convergent on this dense set because A is compactly supported and the input has compact η support. Thus χte−itH0f(H0)P+W∗ has the kernel Kt(x;η,ω)=χt(x)1η<0(2π)2∫ReiΦt(ρ;x,η,ω)A(ρ) dρ,Φt=eρω⋅x−te2ρ+ηρ. The factor (2π)−2 is exactly (2π)−3/2(2π)−1/2. There is no input-dependent amplitude in this kernel.

5.1step 4.1algebra

If f=0 every remaining claim is immediate; otherwise choose a compact interval J containing supp⁡A in its interior with eρ∈[r0,r1]⊂(a,b) throughout J. For ∣x∣<2at and η<0, ∂ρΦt=eρω⋅x−2te2ρ+η≤−2tr0(r0−a)−∣η∣. Writing q=t+∣η∣, this implies ∣∂ρΦt∣≥cq with c=min⁡{2r0(r0−a),1}>0. For every j≥1, ∣∂ρj+1Φt∣≤Cjt≤Cjq on J, uniformly in x,ω,η,t in this region. Repeated quotient differentiation therefore gives ∣∂ρj(1/∂ρΦt)∣≤Cj′q−1, including j=0: each term is a product of higher phase derivatives divided by a power of the first derivative, with one more denominator factor than numerator factors.

6.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra

Define B0=A and Bm+1=−∂ρ(Bm/(i∂ρΦt)). Induction using step 5.1 and the product rule shows, for every fixed m,j, sup⁡J∣∂ρjBm∣≤Cm,jq−m. Each Bm is supported in the same fixed compact subset of the interior of J. Since eiΦt=(i∂ρΦt)−1∂ρeiΦt, integrating by parts m times has no boundary terms and yields ∫JeiΦtA=∫JeiΦtBm. Hence ∣Kt(x;η,ω)∣≤Cmχt(x)1η<0(t+∣η∣)−m. For m≥1 its squared integral is at most Cmt3∫−∞0(t+∣η∣)−2m dη=Cm′t4−2m, where the finite area of S2 and volume of the radius-2at ball have been included in the constant. Cauchy–Schwarz in (η,ω) bounds the operator norm by the square root of this integral, Cm′′t2−m; the resulting bounded integral operator agrees on the dense set of step 4.1 and hence everywhere with the original localized operator. Choose m=N+1 to obtain Cm′′t1−N≤2NCm′′t(1+t)−N for t≥1. This proves the entire outgoing norm estimate.

7.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1algebra

For t=−s≤−1 the same kernel construction with P− has η>0 and phase eρω⋅x+se2ρ+ηρ. In ∣x∣<2as its first derivative is at least 2sr0(r0−a)+η, and its higher derivatives are bounded by Cjs. The recursion and squared integral of steps 5.1–6.1, with q=s+η, give ∥χseisH0f(H0)P−∥≤CNs(1+s)−N. Taking the larger of the outgoing and incoming constants supplies the common CN in (c). If N<0, boundedness by ∥f∥∞ suffices because s(1+s)−N≥1.

8.1step 6.1step 7.1algebra∎

Apply step 6.1 to the cutoff f‾, and take adjoints, to obtain ∥P+f(H0)eisH0χs∥→0 as s→+∞; here f‾(H0)∗=f(H0), and the free group commutes with its spectral cutoff. For a fixed ψ∈L2, ∥P+f(H0)eisH0ψ∥≤∥P+f(H0)eisH0χs∥∥ψ∥+∥f∥∞∥(1−χs)ψ∥⟶0. The first term vanishes by the norm estimate with, for example, N=3, and the second by integrability of ∣ψ∣2 on the expanding balls. Similarly, the adjoint of step 7.1 with cutoff f‾ gives ∥P−f(H0)e−isH0χs∥→0 and the same tail split proves the incoming strong limit. Setting t=−s in the first limit gives exactly the opposite-time limits stated in (c). This completes (a)–(c).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources