Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite Gibbs free-energy minimum

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H be a finite-dimensional complex Hilbert space of dimension d≥1 with inner product linear in the first argument (Hilbert space), let H:H→H be a self-adjoint linear operator with real eigenvalues E1,…,Ed (repeated according to multiplicity) and orthonormal eigenbasis (v1,…,vd), and let β>0. Write Z:=∑j=1de−βEj∈(0,∞),ρβ:=1Z∑j=1de−βEjTvj,vj, where Tu,vx=⟨x,v⟩u (Density operators and scalar spectral probability). Let D be the set of density operators on H, i.e. positive self-adjoint trace-class operators ρ with tr⁡ρ=1 (Trace class operator, Trace of a trace class operator), and for ρ∈D with eigenvalues w1,…,wd≥0 (counted with multiplicity and in any order) define the entropy s(ρ):=−∑i: wi>0wilog⁡wi∈[0,log⁡d] (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function). Then:

(a) ρβ∈D, tr⁡(ρβH)=1Z∑je−βEjEj, and tr⁡(ρβH)−β−1s(ρβ)=−β−1log⁡Z;

(b) for every ρ∈D, tr⁡(ρH)−β−1s(ρ) ≥ −β−1log⁡Z;

(c) for every ρ∈D, s(ρ)≤log⁡d, with s(ρ)=log⁡d if and only if ρ=d−1 id; when H=0 one has Z=d, ρβ=d−1id and the bound in (b) is attained there.

The combination tr⁡(ρH)−β−1s(ρ) is a purely mathematical functional of (ρ,H,β); identifying β with an inverse physical temperature and ρβ with a thermal equilibrium state are additional physical assumptions not asserted here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the finite-dimensional complex Hilbert space H of dimension d≥1, the self-adjoint operator H with eigenvalues Ej and orthonormal eigenbasis (vj), the number β>0, the partition sum Z, the Gibbs weight operator ρβ, and an arbitrary density operator ρ∈D with eigenvalues wi and orthonormal eigenbasis (ui).

[F1]

Finite-dimensional spectral theorem: every self-adjoint (indeed normal) endomorphism of H has an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors; the eigenvalues are real for H, and ρ has an orthonormal eigenbasis with wi≥0, ∑iwi=tr⁡ρ=1 (Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely, Density operators and scalar spectral probability).

[F2]

On a finite-dimensional space every operator is trace class, the trace is basis-independent, and for a diagonal operator the trace is the sum of its eigenvalues (Trace class operator, Trace of a trace class operator, Trace is absolutely convergent and basis independent).

[F3]

For x>0, log⁡′(x)=1/x and log⁡x=∫1xdt/t; for x≥1, 1−1/x≤log⁡x≤x−1 (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t, The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, If f≤g on [a,b] and both are integrable then ∫abf≤∫abg; and m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a)). The inequality log⁡x≤x−1 for every x>0, with equality only at x=1, is derived in step 1.3.

[F4]

For positive x,y, log⁡(xy)=log⁡x+log⁡y, log⁡(x/y)=log⁡x−log⁡y and log⁡(1/x)=−log⁡x (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4algebra

[The Gibbs state and its entropy] The weights qj:=e−βEj/Z are positive with ∑jqj=1, so by [F1] and [F2] ρβ=∑jqjTvj,vj is a positive self-adjoint operator with orthonormal eigenbasis (vj), eigenvalues qj and trace 1; hence ρβ∈D. Its entropy is s(ρβ)=−∑jqjlog⁡qj=∑jqj(βEj+log⁡Z)=βtr⁡(ρβH)+log⁡Z by [F2], where tr⁡(ρβH)=∑jqjEj. Rearranging gives tr⁡(ρβH)−β−1s(ρβ)=−β−1log⁡Z, which is (a).

1.2F1algebra

[The doubly stochastic matrix] Let pij:=∣⟨ui,vj⟩∣2. Since (ui) and (vj) are orthonormal bases, [F1] gives pij≥0, ∑jpij=∥ui∥2=1 and ∑ipij=∥vj∥2=1: the matrix (pij) is doubly stochastic. For ri:=∑jpijqj one has ri>0 because all qj>0 and ∑jpij=1, and ∑iri=∑jqj∑ipij=1.

1.3F1F3algebra

[The entropy bound and equality case] For x>1, the integral formula in [F3] gives log⁡x=∫1xdt/t<x−1, because 1/t<1 for t>1; for 0<x<1, put y=1/x>1. On [1,y) one has 1/t>1/y=x, so log⁡y=∫1ydt/t>x(y−1)=1−x, and the reciprocal law gives log⁡x=−log⁡y<x−1. Thus log⁡x≤x−1 for every x>0, with equality exactly at x=1. Let S:={i:wi>0} and k:=∣S∣, so 1≤k≤d. Then Since 0<wi≤1, every term −wilog⁡wi=wilog⁡(1/wi) is nonnegative. Also s(ρ)−log⁡d=∑i∈Swilog⁡1dwi≤∑i∈Swi(1dwi−1)=kd−1≤0. If s(ρ)=log⁡d, then k=d and equality holds in every positive-weight logarithm inequality, since each individual difference wi[(1/(dwi)−1)−log⁡(1/(dwi))] is nonnegative and their finite sum is zero. The equality characterization above forces 1/(dwi)=1 for all i, so wi=1/d and ρ=∑i(1/d)Tui,ui=d−1id. Conversely ρ=d−1id has entropy log⁡d. When H=0 all Ej=0, so Z=d and ρβ=d−1id, and the bound of (b) is attained there.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3algebra

[Relative entropy is nonnegative] With wi the eigenvalues of ρ in the orthonormal eigenbasis (ui) of [F1], log⁡ρ=∑i:wi>0(log⁡wi)Tui,ui and log⁡ρβ=∑j(log⁡qj)Tvj,vj (finite-dimensional spectral calculus). For the product with ρ, the symbol log⁡ρ here denotes the logarithm on the positive spectral support extended by zero on ker⁡ρ; it does not assign a value to log⁡0. Thus by [F2] tr⁡(ρlog⁡ρ)=∑i:wi>0wilog⁡wi and tr⁡(ρlog⁡ρβ)=∑i:wi>0wi∑jpijlog⁡qj. For each i with wi>0, ri=∑jpijqj>0 and ∑jpij=1 by step 1.2. Applying log⁡x≤x−1 from step 1.3 to x=qj/ri and summing with weights pij gives ∑jpijlog⁡(qj/ri)≤∑jpij(qj/ri−1)=0, hence ∑jpijlog⁡qj≤log⁡ri. Therefore tr⁡(ρlog⁡ρ)−tr⁡(ρlog⁡ρβ)≥∑i:wi>0wi(log⁡wi−log⁡ri)=∑i:wi>0wilog⁡(wi/ri). Writing wilog⁡(wi/ri)=−wilog⁡(ri/wi) and again applying step 1.3 to x=ri/wi>0 gives wilog⁡(wi/ri)≥wi−ri; summing, ∑i:wi>0(wi−ri)=1−∑i:wi>0ri=∑i:wi=0ri≥0, since ∑iri=1 by step 1.2. Therefore tr⁡(ρlog⁡ρ)≥tr⁡(ρlog⁡ρβ).

3.1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

[The lower bound] By the spectral description of ρβ in step 1.1, tr⁡(ρlog⁡ρβ)=∑j(log⁡qj)tr⁡(ρTvj,vj)=∑j(−βEj−log⁡Z)⟨ρvj,vj⟩=−βtr⁡(ρH)−log⁡Z, since ∑j⟨ρvj,vj⟩=tr⁡ρ=1 and tr⁡(ρH)=∑jEj⟨ρvj,vj⟩ (because H=∑jEjTvj,vj). Combining with step 2.1 gives tr⁡(ρlog⁡ρ)≥−βtr⁡(ρH)−log⁡Z; multiplying by β−1 and rearranging, using s(ρ)=−tr⁡(ρlog⁡ρ), gives the bound (b).

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 1.3algebra∎

[Conclusion and scope] Steps 1.1-3.1 prove (a), (b) and (c), including the asserted equality in (a) and the attainment in (c). The final paragraph of the statement records that the thermodynamic reading of the functional and of ρβ requires additional physical assumptions, which are not part of this mathematical statement.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources