How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Residual distance and isolated-eigenspace certificate
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Let be a complex Hilbert space and let be self-adjoint on , with spectral projection-valued measure . Let satisfy , let , and define the residual . For a Borel set , write . If and for every , then
where . If , the second conclusion is .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Choice and Countable Choice; a nonzero complex Hilbert space ; a self-adjoint operator with spectral PVM ; with ; a real ; and a Borel set and gap as in the Statement.
The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice are the set-theoretic assumptions of the spectral theorem and scalar-measure suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
with domain , where is a regular PVM (Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form)).
is a positive measure of total mass (Scalar and complex measures from a pvm).
For real Borel functions, the unbounded PVM integral has its squared-integrability domain and norm identity; the Borel calculus identifies as the essential range of the identity function, and its proof shows (The unbounded PVM integral is densely defined, closed and normal, Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping).
Proof
Apply the Borel sum rule (Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping, Statement, clause 3) to and . By [F1], , while has domain ; thus and . The norm identity in [F3] therefore gives . The measure has total mass one by [F2].
By [F3], is supported on . Set . For every , by the definition of infimum, so step 1.1 yields . Both sides are nonnegative, hence .
Since , the PVM norm identity gives by support from [F3]. On this set , so step 1.1 implies . Taking nonnegative square roots and dividing by proves the cluster estimate. If is empty, [F3] directly gives , yielding the stated zero bound.
Remarks
The residual is the continuum quantity and requires . A raw discrete-matrix residual is not a continuum residual unless its vector and operator action are shown to satisfy these domain hypotheses. The distance estimate locates some spectrum; only the separate gap-and-cluster hypothesis bounds amplitude outside a specified spectral set.