How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one is regular if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring. Fields are excluded from the term DVR.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: Regularity means .
Determinant trick for Nakayama: If a finite module satisfies , some has . Under AC, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal shows that every nonunit lies in a maximal ideal. In this local ring it must lie in , so is a unit: otherwise would force .
Equivalent characterizations of a DVR: Let be a nonfield domain. The following are equivalent. 1. is a discrete valuation ring. 2. is a Noetherian valuation ring. 3. is a one-dimensional Noetherian local integrally closed domain. 4. is a local principal ideal domain with nonzero maximal ideal.
The first clause of The Krull intersection is the -torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case identifies with the elements annihilated by for some . By [F2], each such is a unit under the stated AC premise, so this intersection is .
Proof
Suppose is regular. Lift a basis of the one-dimensional vector space to . Then . The finite module satisfies , so [F2] gives and . Since , and is a nonzero nonunit. Also is not nilpotent: if , every prime contains and hence , making the only prime and forcing dimension zero.
By [F4], . Thus for every nonzero there is a largest with . Write . If then , a contradiction; therefore is a unit. Products of nonzero elements and are nonzero because is not nilpotent, so is a domain. In a nonzero ideal choose an element with least such exponent ; it generates the ideal. The zero ideal is principal too. Thus is a local PID with nonzero maximal ideal, hence a DVR by [F3].
Conversely, a DVR is a nonfield local PID of dimension one by [F3]. Its maximal ideal is nonzero, and by cancellation in a domain, so has basis the class of . Its embedding dimension is one, and it is regular by [F1].
Depends on
The Axiom of Choice
embedding dimension and regular local ring
Determinant trick for Nakayama
In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal
Equivalent characterizations of a DVR
The Krull intersection is the -torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case