Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

BM concentration from a finite invariant affine atlas

Statement

Let T=(C×)r act algebraically on a separated finite-type complex variety X that admits a finite cover by T-invariant affine open subvarieties. Let F=XT be the fixed-point subscheme, i:F↪X its closed inclusion, and let ST be the character multiplicative set in the localized equivariant Borel–Moore definition. Write ST−1HjBM,T(Y;Q)=HjT(Y) for the degree-j piece of the localization of the total graded Borel–Moore module, for Y=F,X. Then in every homological degree j, proper pushforward induces an isomorphism

i∗:ST−1HjBM,T(F;Q)→ ≅ ST−1HjBM,T(X;Q).

No compactness of X, normality hypothesis, or compact-orbit-type nilpotence hypothesis is required.

Statement references

[Torus localization in equivariant Chow groups and its Borel–Moore analogue] Edidin–Graham, Section 3

[Borel–Moore closed/open localization sequence] Ginzburg, Section 1

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The torus action, the finite invariant affine cover, rational coefficients, and the localized Borel–Moore data.

[A1]

AC is inherited through the normalized equivariant Borel–Moore construction; no additional choice principle is used in the finite affine-cover argument. Localized torus-equivariant Borel–Moore classes

[F1]

The normalized total graded equivariant Borel–Moore groups are modules over RT, with proper pushforwards and invariant-open restrictions. Localized torus-equivariant Borel–Moore classes

[F2]

On an invariant affine principal open D(f) cut out by a nonzero-weight eigenfunction, some nontrivial character class annihilates every equivariant Borel–Moore class, including after any further invariant open restriction. Nonzero eigenfunctions annihilate equivariant BM on their nonvanishing loci

[F3]

A closed subset and its open complement give the equivariant Borel–Moore long exact sequence through support localization. Constructible six functors, proper base change and normalized equivariant duality

[F4]

Localization of RT-modules by ST preserves short and long exact sequences. Localization preserves exact sequences of modules

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1givenconstruct

Fix a member U=Spec⁡A of the invariant affine cover. Choose finitely many algebra generators of A. The algebraic T-action makes A a rational T-comodule, so the coaction of each generator is a finite Laurent sum and the generator is a finite sum of character eigenfunctions. Replacing the generators by these finitely many eigencomponents still generates A, since their sums recover the original generators. The fixed ideal in A is generated by its nontrivial-weight subspace: the coaction sends a weight-χ element f to f⊗χ, so the equalizer with the trivial coaction kills f when χ≠1, and the quotient by all such elements has only weight-zero functions and hence trivial action. The ideal generated by the nontrivial-weight algebra generators contains every nonzero-weight polynomial in the generators, since each monomial of nonzero total weight has a nonzero-weight factor. Thus U∖F is covered by the finitely many invariant principal opens D(f) for those generators.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

Taking these principal opens over the finitely many affine charts gives a finite invariant open cover {Da} of X∖F. Every nonempty finite intersection is a T-invariant open subset of at least one Da; [F2] therefore makes its localized Borel–Moore groups zero in every degree.

3.1F1F2F4step 2.1construct

For a finite invariant open cover of X∖F, the augmented Čech complex with terms jI!QDI, where DI is an intersection and jI:DI↪X∖F is open, resolves the constant equivariant sheaf. At a point the indices containing it form a nonempty simplex, whose augmented chain complex is contracted by adjoining its least index. Applying derived Hom into the normalized dualizing object gives a finite Čech spectral sequence for Borel–Moore homology: open base change identifies each term with the Borel–Moore group of an intersection DI. Those groups vanish after localization by [F2]. Take the direct sum over all homological degrees in each term, so that the spectral sequence consists of RT-modules with homogeneous differentials. Since the Čech filtration is finite and localization of these total modules is exact by [F4], taking the homogeneous degree pieces gives that the abutment ST−1HjBM,T(X∖F;Q) is zero for every j.

4.1A1F1F3F4step 3.1∎

Apply exact localization to the total graded closed/open sequence and then take homogeneous pieces. The resulting closed/open localization sequence for i:F↪X and X∖F contains ST−1Hj+1BM,T(X∖F)→ST−1HjBM,T(F)→i∗ST−1HjBM,T(X)→ST−1HjBM,T(X∖F). Both outside groups vanish by step 3.1, so i∗ is an isomorphism. If F=∅, the same argument gives zero localized Borel–Moore homology for X; if F=X, i∗ is the identity. The proof used only the finite invariant affine cover and not Sumihiro's theorem or compactness.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources