Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Existence and uniqueness of continuous scalar Green maps on smooth globally hyperbolic spacetimes

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Let (M,g,N) be any Hausdorff second-countable time-oriented smooth globally hyperbolic Lorentzian four-manifold without boundary, with signature (−,+,+,+), equipped with a chosen orientation as specified in the Green-data definition, and let V∈C∞(M;R) be arbitrary. For P=−□g+V there exist unique continuous real-linear maps E+,E−:Cc∞(M;R)→C∞(M;R) such that

PE+f=E+Pf=f,PE−f=E−Pf=f,

supp⁡E+f⊆J+(supp⁡f),supp⁡E−f⊆J−(supp⁡f).

Continuity uses the test-function LF topology and the compact derivative topology of the Green-data definition. The operator is formally self-adjoint for μg, and its smooth Cauchy problem has uniqueness on every smooth spacelike Cauchy hypersurface. Thus these maps realize the complete Green-data interface for every such geometry and potential. No Green-map existence or scalar Cauchy solvability is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, Dependent Choice and the smooth geometric and operator hypotheses in the Statement; the conventions for P, μg, test topology and causal support are those of the Green-data definition.

[F1]

Smooth scalar Cauchy evolution, metric causal support and finite-slab estimates constructs smooth scalar Cauchy evolution, one-sided metric causal support, uniqueness even without support bounds, and estimates of every compact-output seminorm by finitely many fixed-compact input seminorms. It supplies a smooth Cauchy temporal foliation and arbitrary-Cauchy-surface uniqueness. Its proof uses published local symmetric-hyperbolic results, not Green maps.

[F2]

Scalar distributions on smooth manifolds and Green-hyperbolic free scalar interface define the LF test topology and the positive metric density. Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds permits localization of integrations of compactly supported smooth densities to finitely many charts.

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1F1A1construct

(Retarded construction.) Fix the smooth time t of [F1]. For nonzero compact test f, choose a<min⁡t(supp⁡f) and solve Pu=f with zero data on Sa using [F1]. Below that slice the source and both data vanish, so uniqueness and its time-reversed support assertion give u=0. Above it the one-sided support assertion gives supp⁡u⊆J+(supp⁡f). Define E+f=u and E+0=0. A different sufficiently early slice gives the same solution: both solutions have zero data on a still earlier common slice and the same source, so [F1] uniqueness identifies them. Reversing time constructs E−f from zero data on any slice later than the support and gives the past support.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

(Two-sided inverse identities and uniqueness.) The construction gives PE±f=f. If k is compact, locality gives supp⁡Pk⊆supp⁡k. The compact smooth function k and E+(Pk) both solve Pu=Pk and have zero data on a common slice earlier than supp⁡k; uniqueness gives E+Pk=k. The advanced identity is time reversed. If any other smooth retarded solution of Pu=f has support in J+(supp⁡f), it has zero data on that earlier slice and equals E+f by [F1]. The same holds for advanced solutions, proving uniqueness of the maps. Common early or late slices for a finite list of tests and uniqueness give additivity and real homogeneity, hence real linearity.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2algebra

(Continuity in the actual topologies.) Fix compact input support K and compact output set L with a specified derivative order. Choose a<min⁡t(K) and a finite slab containing Sa and L; if K is empty the restriction is zero. Step 1.1 constructs every E+f for supp⁡f⊆K from zero data on this same Sa. The estimate in [F1] therefore bounds the selected output seminorm by a constant times finitely many fixed-K input derivative seminorms. This proves continuity of E+ restricted to each fixed-compact test space. The LF topology in [F2] is the locally convex inductive-limit topology of these spaces, so a linear map into the locally convex space C∞(M) is continuous precisely when all such restrictions are continuous. Thus E+ is continuous; the late-slice estimate gives continuity of E−. No sequential-continuity substitute or unsupported closed-graph argument is used.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1F1F2constructdischarge-construct∎

(The remaining interface conditions.) For compact smooth f and arbitrary smooth u, the coordinate divergence expression for □g and integration by parts give ∫Mf(−□gu) μg=∫Mgab(∂af)(∂bu) μg=∫M(−□gf)u μg. These identities are justified by localizing the compact support to finitely many charts using [F2]: the extra partition derivatives sum to zero, and each chart integration has compact support. Multiplication by the real V is symmetric, proving formal self-adjointness. Arbitrary smooth spacelike Cauchy-surface uniqueness is the last conclusion of [F1]. Together with steps 1.1–3.1 these establish every condition in the defined Green-data interface for the full stated class of backgrounds.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources