How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One-coupling truncated RG flow and leading beta-coefficient invariance
Statement
Let be a dimensionless scale and put . Take to be an interval containing . Let be a differentiable real coupling and let be dimensionless constants; require to satisfy the truncated scalar initial-value problem A solution through is maximal if there is no strictly larger interval and solution of the same initial-value problem with . If , the unique maximal real solution is on . If , the unique maximal solution through is on when and on when .
For the formal beta-series calculation, let be an indeterminate and work in . Write and let be an invertible formal change of dimensionless coupling, with dimensionless . The notation means an element of , so its terms have degree at least ; the real trajectory is distinct from the formal indeterminate . Put , let be the termwise formal derivative, and define the transformed formal vector field in by The quadratic coefficient of is . The real ODE is exact only for the displayed truncation; neither it nor the formal scheme-change statement determines from a QFT graph or bounds omitted higher-order terms. Its pole is a property of this truncated equation, not a theorem about an ultraviolet completion.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , dimensionless with , and the formal change in .
The vector field is the prescribed truncation on ; no higher-order beta coefficients or measured coupling are specified.
The formal beta transformation is defined in by push-forward under the invertible formal series ; its termwise derivatives and substitutions are coefficientwise, and no formal series is assumed to converge.
The Statement takes dimensionless and , and separates the real trajectory from the formal indeterminate . The scalar coefficient is prescribed independently; no renormalization cocycle or QFT coefficient calculation is assumed.
First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals: a solution on an interval is a differentiable real function satisfying the stated equation and initial condition.
Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters: a vector field is locally Lipschitz in the state variable when one finite Lipschitz constant works on each compact time-state cylinder.
Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems: a continuous vector field locally Lipschitz in the state variable has a unique local solution, and two solutions with the same initial data agree on every common interval containing the initial time.
Proof
Given: [A1]–[A2] and [F1]–[F4].
Under [A1], [F1] fixes as the dimensionless scale coordinate and the vector field is the prescribed . If , the constant function has derivative zero and , so it solves the IVP on all of . If , set on the interval specified in the Statement. For every interior , and , so it solves the IVP.
The vector field is continuous on the open domain . On any compact time-state cylinder with , so it is locally Lipschitz in the state variable by [F3]. Uniqueness from [F4] shows that every solution through agrees with step 1.1 on its common interval. If , any strictly larger interval containing the stated interval must contain . A solution on such an interval would be continuous at , while uniqueness forces on the original interval and as approaches from within it, a contradiction. When , the constant solution already exists on all of . These facts establish the stated maximal intervals.
Termwise differentiation in gives . Since has linear term , recursive coefficient matching gives , hence . Therefore and re-expression in yields . The coefficient is unchanged; no coefficient at higher order is determined here.
Remarks
The adjacent Low-momentum matching has a controlled remainder is a separate spectral remainder estimate under its low-energy band hypothesis. It supplies no estimate for omitted terms in this beta truncation. This theorem derives no numerical QED beta coefficient and identifies no scheme parameter with a measured observable. The context of Formal scaling and renormalization cocycle motivates the logarithmic scale convention; the present theorem uses that convention directly and assumes no existence of a renormalization map or time-ordered system.