Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One-coupling truncated RG flow and leading beta-coefficient invariance

Statement

Let ρ>0 be a dimensionless scale and put t=log⁡ρ∈R. Take I⊆R to be an interval containing 0. Let g:I→R be a differentiable real coupling and let b,g0∈R be dimensionless constants; require g to satisfy the truncated scalar initial-value problem dgdt=bg2,g(0)=g0. A solution through (0,g0) is maximal if there is no strictly larger interval J⊋I and solution G:J→R of the same initial-value problem with G∣I=g. If c:=bg0=0, the unique maximal real solution is g(t)=g0 on R. If c≠0, the unique maximal solution through t=0 is g(t)=g01−bg0t on (−∞,c−1) when c>0 and on (c−1,∞) when c<0.

For the formal beta-series calculation, let u be an indeterminate and work in R[[u]]. Write β(u)=bu2+O(u3) and let Φ(u)=u+au2+O(u3) be an invertible formal change of dimensionless coupling, with dimensionless a∈R. The notation O(uk) means an element of ukR[[u]], so its terms have degree at least k; the real trajectory g(t) is distinct from the formal indeterminate u. Put u~=Φ(u), let Φ′ be the termwise formal derivative, and define the transformed formal vector field in R[[u~]] by β~(u~)=(Φ′(u)β(u))∣u=Φ−1(u~). The quadratic coefficient of β~ is b. The real ODE is exact only for the displayed truncation; neither it nor the formal scheme-change statement determines b from a QFT graph or bounds omitted higher-order terms. Its pole is a property of this truncated equation, not a theorem about an ultraviolet completion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: b,g0∈R, c=bg0, dimensionless ρ>0 with t=log⁡ρ, and the formal change Φ(u)=u+au2+O(u3) in R[[u]].

[A1]

The vector field is the prescribed truncation F(t,g)=bg2 on D=R2; no higher-order beta coefficients or measured coupling are specified.

[A2]

The formal beta transformation is defined in R[[u]] by push-forward under the invertible formal series Φ; its termwise derivatives and substitutions are coefficientwise, and no formal series is assumed to converge.

[F1]

The Statement takes ρ>0 dimensionless and t=log⁡ρ, and separates the real trajectory g(t) from the formal indeterminate u∈R[[u]]. The scalar coefficient b is prescribed independently; no renormalization cocycle or QFT coefficient calculation is assumed.

[F2]

First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals: a solution on an interval is a differentiable real function satisfying the stated equation and initial condition.

[F3]

Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters: a vector field is locally Lipschitz in the state variable when one finite Lipschitz constant works on each compact time-state cylinder.

[F4]

Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems: a continuous vector field locally Lipschitz in the state variable has a unique local solution, and two solutions with the same initial data agree on every common interval containing the initial time.

Proof

technique · direct verification of the rational solution, ODE uniqueness, and formal re-expansion

Given: [A1]–[A2] and [F1]–[F4].

1.1A1F1F2algebra

Under [A1], [F1] fixes t=log⁡ρ as the dimensionless scale coordinate and the vector field is the prescribed F(t,g)=bg2. If c=0, the constant function g(t)=g0 has derivative zero and bg02=0, so it solves the IVP on all of R. If c≠0, set γ(t)=g0/(1−ct) on the interval specified in the Statement. For every interior t, γ(t+h)−γ(t)h=g0c(1−ct)(1−c(t+h))⟶g0c(1−ct)2=bγ(t)2, and γ(0)=g0, so it solves the IVP.

2.1A1F2F3F4step 1.1

The vector field F(t,x)=bx2 is continuous on the open domain D=R2. On any compact time-state cylinder with ∣x∣,∣y∣≤R, ∣F(t,x)−F(t,y)∣=∣b∣∣x−y∣∣x+y∣≤2∣b∣R∣x−y∣, so it is locally Lipschitz in the state variable by [F3]. Uniqueness from [F4] shows that every solution through (0,g0) agrees with step 1.1 on its common interval. If c≠0, any strictly larger interval containing the stated interval must contain c−1. A solution G on such an interval would be continuous at c−1, while uniqueness forces G=γ on the original interval and ∣γ(t)∣→∞ as t approaches c−1 from within it, a contradiction. When c=0, the constant solution already exists on all of R. These facts establish the stated maximal intervals.

3.1A2algebra∎

Termwise differentiation in R[[u]] gives Φ′(u)=1+2au+O(u2). Since Φ has linear term u, recursive coefficient matching gives Φ−1(u~)=u~+O(u~2), hence u2=u~2+O(u~3). Therefore Φ′(u)β(u)=bu2+O(u3) and re-expression in u~ yields β~(u~)=bu~2+O(u~3). The coefficient b is unchanged; no coefficient at higher order is determined here.

Remarks

The adjacent Low-momentum matching has a controlled remainder is a separate spectral remainder estimate under its low-energy band hypothesis. It supplies no estimate for omitted terms in this beta truncation. This theorem derives no numerical QED beta coefficient and identifies no scheme parameter with a measured observable. The context of Formal scaling and renormalization cocycle motivates the logarithmic scale convention; the present theorem uses that convention directly and assumes no existence of a renormalization map or time-ordered system.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources