Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonzero pure-point equilibrium covariance is not integrable

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the trace-class Gibbs hypotheses of Trace-Gibbs bounded correlation measure and balance for a self-adjoint Hamiltonian K in J with a complete discrete energy basis and faithful Gibbs density σβ at β>0 in J−1. Let ℏ>0 be in J s, t in s, and let A=A∗ be a nonzero bounded observable with Tr⁡(σβA)=0. Define CAA(t)=Tr⁡(σβU(t)∗AU(t)A),GAA(t)=Re⁡CAA(t),U(t)=e−itK/ℏ. Then neither CAA nor GAA belongs to L1([0,∞)). In particular, the ordinary absolutely convergent isolated-system correlation integral used in a dc Green–Kubo formula does not exist under these hypotheses. This claim concerns discrete-spectrum trace-Gibbs dynamics only; it asserts no failure of temporal decay or transport limits in an infinite-volume or open-system model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a faithful trace-class Gibbs state with a complete energy eigenbasis, a nonzero bounded self-adjoint centered A, and ℏ>0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: full Choice is assumed by the unbounded self-adjoint spectral theorem and trace-Gibbs supplier.

[F1]

Trace-Gibbs bounded correlation measure and balance: for the Gibbs energy basis, CAA(t) has an absolutely summable atomic expansion with nonnegative weights ri∣Aij∣2, whose total is CAA(0)=∑iri∥Aui∥2≤∥A∥2; σβ is faithful.

[F2]

Dominated convergence: on any measure space, pointwise convergence under an integrable majorant permits passage of limits through integrals.

Proof

technique · grouped pure-point frequencies have a nonzero mean-square limit, which contradicts absolute integrability

Given: [A1], [F1], [F2], and the centered nonzero observable in the Statement.

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Group the nonnegative coefficients in [F1] by equal frequency, writing CAA(t)=∑ω∈Ωwωe−iωt with wω≥0 and ∑ωwω=CAA(0)=Tr⁡(σβA2). This sum is strictly positive: in the complete energy basis, Tr⁡(σβA2)=∑iri∥Aui∥2, every ri>0, and A≠0 prevents all Aui from vanishing. It is bounded by ∥A∥2 because each ∥Aui∥2≤∥A∥2 and ∑iri=1.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1algebra

Absolute summability gives ∑ω,νwωwν<∞ and allows termwise integration of ∣CAA(t)∣2. For each pair, T−1∫0Te−i(ω−ν)tdt tends to 1 if ω=ν and 0 otherwise, and its modulus is at most 1. Apply [F2] to the countable pair set with summable majorant wωwν; then lim⁡T→∞1T∫0T∣CAA(t)∣2dt=∑ωwω2>0. If CAA∈L1([0,∞)), the left side is at most ∥A∥2T−1∫0T∣CAA(t)∣dt→0, because step 1.1 gives ∣CAA(t)∣≤∑ωwω≤∥A∥2. This contradiction proves CAA∉L1.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The real part has grouped nonnegative weights gω=(wω+w−ω)/2, with absent frequencies assigned weight zero. They satisfy ∑ωgω=∑ωwω>0 and GAA(t)=∑ωgωe−iωt. Repeating step 2.1 with gω gives lim⁡T→∞T−1∫0TGAA(t)2dt=∑ωgω2>0. If GAA∈L1, then this average is at most ∥A∥2T−1∫0T∣GAA(t)∣dt→0, again a contradiction.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources