How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded quantum lattice pressure on cubes and van Hove sets
Statement
Let , , and let be a translation-invariant uniformly bounded finite-range interaction as in Translation-invariant finite-range spin interaction. For each finite nonempty , let be its free-boundary finite-volume Hamiltonian, , and , where is the ordinary finite-matrix trace of Local spin matrix algebras and their factor inclusions. Fix , measured in inverse joules when the interaction terms are assigned energy units.
Write for the lattice metric of Local spin matrix algebras and their factor inclusions. For a finite and , define . This minimum exists: is finite, so its complement is nonempty, and the distances from to that complement are positive integers. A sequence of finite nonempty regions is van Hove if and, for every fixed integer , the inner boundary satisfies . Then converges to the same finite value for every van Hove sequence; in particular, for positive integers , the cube limit for exists and equals this value. The normalization is dimensionless log-partition per lattice site; the finite-volume Helmholtz free energy per site is .
For every van Hove sequence and every sequence of self-adjoint matrices satisfying , the perturbed normalized log-partition functions satisfy No spatial support condition on is needed. This theorem makes no claim for changes to the bulk interaction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , finite site dimension , a translation-invariant interaction with finite range and per-site norm bound, finite regions , and .
If interaction terms are interpreted as energies, each and has units joules and has units ; and are dimensionless.
Translation-invariant finite-range spin interaction: the finite canonical-shape list represents each nonzero translation orbit once, the terms are translation copies, and sums exactly the self-adjoint terms whose full supports lie in , with . Local spin matrix algebras and their factor inclusions: and is the ordinary finite-matrix trace.
Duhamel derivative and finite Kubo–Mori response: for a continuously differentiable finite-dimensional Hermitian path , , where . The proof uses the convergent matrix-exponential derivative and finite trace cyclicity; this proof uses only the first-derivative clause, not the supplier's separate Hessian-positivity clause.
Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely: every normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner-product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis. In particular this applies to the self-adjoint finite-volume Hamiltonians.
Proof
Given: [A1], [F1]–[F3], the van Hove sequence and self-adjoint perturbations in the Statement, and the finite-volume partition functions.
Write for the finite anchored-shape list and . For each shape there are at most translates contained in , so . By [F3], has real eigenvalues in . Therefore , and is real and uniformly bounded.
For self-adjoint matrices on the same finite spin space, put . Apply [F2] to obtain . The matrix is positive with trace one by [F3]; diagonalizing gives , since each unit eigenvector obeys . Integrating over proves . In particular, for self-adjoint Hamiltonians on that same space, .
Fix an integer block side and tile by disjoint full -cubes, leaving as the residual sites. The strips in the coordinate directions give when . Let be the sum of the free-boundary Hamiltonians of the full blocks, embedded into , and zero on residual sites. An interaction term omitted from this cut either meets or crosses an internal grid plane. For each anchored shape, at most translates meet , because choosing a site of the shape and a residual site determines its anchor. For a fixed coordinate grid plane, at most anchors can have a support crossing it, where : the support's coordinate span is at most , the anchor must lie in an interval of at most lattice sites, and each of the other anchor coordinates has at most choices. There are at most internal planes. Thus .
The block Hamiltonians act on separate tensor factors. Diagonalize each block Hamiltonian using [F3]; tensor products of their eigenvectors and residual-site basis vectors form an orthonormal eigenbasis of . Hence . Step 1.2 and the residual-volume bound imply .
For any , choose so large that . The estimate in step 3.1 then makes for all sufficiently large . The sequence is Cauchy in and converges to a finite by step 1.1. The estimate also gives .
Let be van Hove and fix . Use any fixed offset to tile by -cubes, retain only cubes fully contained in , and let be their number. Every residual site lies in a grid cube that also contains some , so and . Thus and . Define to be the sum of the free-boundary Hamiltonians on the retained full cubes, embedded in , and zero on the residual sites. Any omitted interaction term either meets , in which case its anchor lies in , or crosses a face between two retained cubes. For each retained cube, at most anchor sites lie in its face layers wide enough for a support of range to cross a face; hence all internal-cut anchors number at most . Since the norm sum over shapes at one anchor is , . Translation invariance makes every full-block partition function equal to , and the zero residual Hamiltonian contributes , so . Divide the comparison from step 1.2 by ; the van Hove condition sends the fixed-width boundary term and to zero, while . Therefore . Letting and using step 4.1 proves .
Put . Applying step 1.2 to the self-adjoint matrices and shows that . This tends to zero by hypothesis, so step 5.1 gives .