Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Entropy and mode restrictions of finite quasifree CAR states

Statement

Let r≥1, let C=C∗ be an r×r matrix with 0≤C≤I, and let ρC be the finite gauge-invariant quasifree density with covariance C from the preceding construction. Use dimensionless entropy in nats and the convention 0ln⁡0:=0. Then S(ρC)=−Tr⁡Cr ⁣(Cln⁡C+(I−C)ln⁡(I−C)).

Let K be any nonzero linear subspace of Cr, let PK be its orthogonal projection, and put CK:=PKC∣K. Choose an ordered orthonormal basis of K followed by one of K⊥. The exterior-power unitary identifies the full occupation basis with the tensor product of the two ordered occupation bases; let ρK be the partial trace of ρC over the K⊥ factor in that order. Then the restricted state is gauge-invariant quasifree with covariance CK, and S(ρK)=−Tr⁡K ⁣(CKln⁡CK+(IK−CK)ln⁡(IK−CK)). Both formulas include covariance eigenvalues 0 and 1. Changing the orthonormal basis of K conjugates the reduced density and compressed covariance by the induced unitary on the retained factor. Changing the basis of K⊥ changes only the traced factor, and the partial trace is invariant under that unitary conjugation. Thus neither entropy depends on these choices.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite CAR Fock space on Cr, a Hermitian contraction C, its density ρC, and a nonzero subspace K⊆Cr. Use the displayed mode order and the natural logarithm.

[F1]

Finite CAR quasifree states and covariance: the covariance convention is Cji=ω(ci∗cj); the state is gauge invariant; its normally ordered equal-creator/annihilator moments are the determinants of the two-point matrix, and unequal-number moments vanish.

[F2]

Existence, uniqueness, and Gibbs covariance for finite CAR states: every finite Hermitian contraction C has a unique such density, unitarily equivalent to the product occupation density with probabilities νj and 1−νj for the eigenvalues νj of C.

[F3]

Dimensionless entropy, mutual and conditional information: finite density entropy is −Tr⁡(ρln⁡ρ) in nats, with 0ln⁡0:=0; the partial trace contracts the second ordered tensor factor and retains the first.

[F4]

Occupation bases and actual CCR/CAR domains: the finite fermionic occupation vectors form an orthonormal basis, and the CAR shifts give the creation/annihilation action and its parity signs.

[F5]

Finite matrix spectral and state calculus: finite Hermitian matrices have orthonormal eigenbases, spectral functions are basis-independent, and the finite trace is invariant under unitary conjugation.

[F6]

Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis: every finite-dimensional subspace and its orthogonal complement admit orthonormal bases.

Proof

1.1givenF2F5algebra

By [F5], write C=Vdiag⁡(ν1,…,νr)V∗ with V unitary and νj∈[0,1] . By [F2], after conjugation by the induced exterior-power unitary, ρC is diagonal on the occupation basis with probabilities pm=∏jwj(mj) , where wj(0)=1−νj and wj(1)=νj . These probabilities sum to one because ∑m∈{0,1}rpm=∏j((1−νj)+νj)=1 .

1.2F1F2F3F4F6algebra

Choose the ordered orthonormal bases of K and K⊥ using [F6]. The map from the full occupation vector to the tensor product of its K -occupation and K⊥ -occupation vectors sends one orthonormal basis onto another, hence extends to a unitary factorization. Because the K modes come first, their creation and annihilation operators act on the first factor as cjK⊗I ; the CAR parity signs from preceding modes are therefore entirely within that first factor. The partial trace over K⊥ has the same expectation as ρC for every word in the K modes. Restricting the determinant rule [F1] to those words gives the compressed covariance CK=PKC∣K and the quasifree moment rule; gauge invariance is inherited under restriction. Thus ρK is the unique quasifree density for CK by [F2].

2.1F2F3F5step 1.1algebra

Unitary conjugation preserves the eigenvalues, so the entropy is −∑mpmln⁡pm , with zero terms omitted under [F3]. When 0<νj<1 , expand ln⁡pm=∑j[mjln⁡νj+(1−mj)ln⁡(1−νj)] and sum the finite product distribution; its j th occupation has mean νj . The result is −∑j[νjln⁡νj+(1−νj)ln⁡(1−νj)] . If νj=0 or 1 , that mode has a deterministic occupation and contributes zero by [F3], which is the same formula with 0ln⁡0=0 . Spectral calculus for C and I−C now identifies this sum with the displayed matrix trace.

3.1F2F3step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

Apply the calculation of step 2.1 to the finite quasifree density ρK and its positive contraction CK . The same endpoint convention 0ln⁡0=0 handles pure or rank-deficient reduced states. A change of orthonormal basis in K conjugates ρK by the induced unitary and CK by the corresponding matrix unitary, so [F3] makes the trace entropy unchanged. A change of basis in K⊥ conjugates only the traced factor; for a unitary matrix U on that factor, the partial-trace entry sum in [F3] contains ∑jUjaUjb‾=δab , so ρK is unchanged. This proves the restriction formula and its basis independence.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources