Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Crossing strings and local scalar compression

Physical scope

Exact finite square-torus stabilizer algebra only; no perturbation-stability or thermodynamic-limit claim.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and use the square L×L torus cellulation, L≥3. A closed primal Z string and a closed dual X string commute or anticommute according to the parity of their edge crossings: their commutator sign is (−1)I, where I is the mod-two intersection number. Let P0 be the orthogonal projection onto the common +1 eigenspace of all vertex and face stabilizers. For any operator O supported on an edge set contained in a disk whose complement contains the coordinate cycles p1,p2,q1,q2 specified in the definition, there is a scalar λ(O)∈C such that P0OP0=λ(O)P0. This is exact local indistinguishability for the unperturbed finite Hamiltonian.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A square L×L torus with L≥3, the toric-code operators of the definition, the common ground projection P0, and the Axiom of Choice inherited by the ground-space theorem.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), used only through the surface Euler-characteristic input in [F2].

[F1]

Toric-code edge spins on closed-surface cellulations: X(a)Z(b) is the canonical Pauli basis; Av=X(∂1Tv), Bf=Z(∂2f); primal and dual crossing parity is the mod-two intersection number.

[F2]

Commuting stabilizers and topological degeneracy: under [A1], the common +1 eigenspace is nonzero, is the ground space, and has dimension 22g.

[F3]

Disk-supported Pauli centralizers are stabilizers: a Pauli string supported on the stated disk-local set and commuting with every stabilizer is a product of stabilizers.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

On each edge, XZ=−ZX, while Pauli operators on distinct edges commute. Moving the X factors of a dual string past the Z factors of a primal string therefore contributes one minus sign for each shared crossed edge. The total sign is (−1)I, with I the number of crossings modulo two.

1.2givenA1F1F2algebra

Let T⊆E be a finite edge support for O contained in the disk from the statement. On one edge, I,X,Z,XZ are four linearly independent matrices in the four-dimensional space M2(C); their tensor products indexed by a,b∈F2T form a basis of the matrix algebra on (C2)⊗T. Extend a,b by zero on E∖T and expand O=∑a,bca,bX(a)Z(b) in that basis. For a Pauli term Q that anticommutes with some stabilizer S, the ground projection satisfies P0S=SP0=P0 and SQ=−QS. Hence P0QP0=P0SQP0=−P0QSP0=−P0QP0, so P0QP0=0.

2.1givenA1F2F3step 1.2algebra∎

Every Pauli term in the expansion either anticommutes with a stabilizer, and has zero compression by step 1.2, or commutes with every stabilizer. In the latter case [F3] writes it as a product of stabilizers; each acts as the identity on the range of P0, so its compression is P0. Summing the finitely many compressed terms gives P0OP0=λ(O)P0 for the sum of their coefficients.

Remarks

The proof is independent of the diagram. The picture shows one representative pair of fundamental cycles on the square fundamental domain; opposite sides are identified, the blue solid path is primal, and the red dashed path is dual.

p1q1left/rightandtop/bottomsidesareidenti¯ed

At the displayed crossing the primal and dual strings meet on one edge, so their intersection parity is one and their Pauli strings anticommute. A diagram illustrates the convention; it supplies no proof step. No perturbation-stability claim follows from this exact compression identity.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources