Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Toric-code Hamiltonians and local indistinguishability

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Toric-code edge spins on closed-surface cellulations

Physical scope

Pure finite-dimensional mathematics; no physical premise, empirical claim, or stability claim.

Definition

Here a closed surface S means a nonempty, compact, connected, boundaryless topological 2-manifold in the convention of the earlier definition Topological manifolds with and without boundary: S is Hausdorff (distinct points have disjoint open neighborhoods), has an at-most-countable basis of open sets (every open set is a union of basis members), and for every x∈S there are an open neighborhood U and a homeomorphism h:U→V onto an open subset V⊆R+2, where R+2={(t1,t2)∈R2:t2≥0}. The model boundary is t2=0, and the manifold boundary subset defined by that chart convention is empty; equivalently, every point has a neighborhood homeomorphic to an open subset of R2. It is orientable when it has an R-orientation for R=Z under the earlier definition R-orientation of a topological manifold: a continuous section of the local homology system with fibers H2(S,S∖{x};Z) that generates each fiber.

A finite cellulation K of S is a finite 2-dimensional CW decomposition with vertex, edge, and face sets V,E,F and no higher-dimensional cells: each edge has a characteristic map from [0,1] whose restriction to (0,1) maps homeomorphically onto that edge and whose endpoints map to vertices; each face has a characteristic map from the closed disk whose interior maps homeomorphically onto that face and whose boundary follows a finite closed edge path in the resulting graph. The quotient is S, and loops, multiple edges, and repeated face-edge incidences are allowed. The primal graph has vertices V and edges E. The dual graph has one vertex for each face and one dual edge crossing each primal edge, joining its two incident face sides; loops and multiple edges are allowed. Assume both graphs are connected. Let F2={0,1} with addition modulo two, and for each finite cell set W use the standard dot product ⟨r,s⟩=∑w∈Wrwsw on F2W; transposes are taken in the cell bases. Incidence multiplicities are reduced modulo two: ∂1:F2E→F2V sends each edge to the sum of its endpoint incidences, and ∂2:F2F→F2E sends each face to its boundary-edge incidence vector. Since each face boundary is a closed edge path, ∂1∂2=0. Since S has no boundary, each edge has two incident face sides, counted with multiplicity, so ∂2(∑f∈Ff)=0. No orientation of the surface or of its cells is chosen or needed for these mod-two constructions.

Identify E with a finite region Λ⊂Z and use the finite local spin matrix algebra on Λ with spin dimension q=2. The edge Hilbert space is HK=(C2)⊗E, so dim⁡HK=2∣E∣. Let X=(0110) and Z=(100−1). For a,b∈F2E, define X(a)=⨂e∈EXae, Z(b)=⨂e∈EZbe, and P(a,b)=X(a)Z(b). For a vertex v and face f, put Av=X(∂1Tv) and Bf=Z(∂2f), where v and f also denote the corresponding basis vectors. Thus Av is the product of X over incident edges with odd incidence, and Bf is the product of Z over boundary edges with odd incidence. The identity ∂1∂2=0 makes every Av commute with every Bf; each is a self-adjoint involution.

For positive real coefficients Jv,Kf, define the toric-code Hamiltonian

HK=∑v∈VJvI−Av2+∑f∈FKfI−Bf2.

The Pauli operators are dimensionless. In a physical interpretation, Jv,Kf have energy units (joules in SI); here they are positive mathematical coefficients and no measured values are asserted. A simultaneous +1 eigenvector of all Av,Bf is called a ground vector. The ground space is their common +1 eigenspace, equivalently ker⁡HK.

For the square L×L torus, L≥3, use vertices ZL2, horizontal and vertical nearest-neighbor edges, and the L2 square faces, with periodic boundary conditions. A coordinate cycle is a closed edge path winding once around one coordinate direction. Let p1,p2 be the horizontal and vertical coordinate cycles in the primal graph, and let q1,q2 be the corresponding vertical and horizontal coordinate cycles in the dual graph, chosen so that I(pi,qj)=δij. The mod-two intersection number is the parity of primal edges crossed by a dual cycle. A topological disk is a subset homeomorphic to the closed unit disk. A finite edge support is disk-local with full complement cycles if it is contained in a topological disk whose complement contains representatives of these two primal and two dual coordinate cycles. The phrase “both independent homology cycles” below refers to these two primal cycles and their dual crossing representatives.

An edge path in a graph with vertex set W and edge set D is a finite sequence w0,d1,w1,…,dn,wn in which each di joins wi−1 to wi. Its mod-two edge chain counts each edge occurrence modulo two; the boundary of this chain is w0+wn. An open primal path is such a path in the vertex-edge graph with distinct endpoint vertices w0≠wn; its Z string is Z(b) for its edge chain b. An open dual path is such a path in the face-adjacency graph with distinct endpoint faces w0≠wn; its X string is X(a) for the primal edges crossed by its dual edges. The same formulas define strings along closed paths, whose endpoints coincide (w0=wn). A closed string has zero boundary in the corresponding graph. The support of an operator is a finite edge set S such that the operator is a matrix on (C2)⊗S tensored with the identity on E∖S.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Commuting stabilizers and topological degeneracy

Physical scope

Pure finite-dimensional mathematics for the stated unperturbed Hamiltonian; no empirical realization or perturbation stability claim.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let K be a finite cellulation of a closed, connected, orientable surface of genus g≥0, with the incidence and Hamiltonian conventions of the toric-code definition. For positive couplings Jv,Kf, the Hamiltonian is positive and frustration free, meaning its positive penalty terms have a common nonzero vector in their kernels. Its ground-space dimension is 22g. Define its spectral gap as the least positive eigenvalue of HK, or +∞ if there is no positive eigenvalue. This gap is at least 2m, where m=min⁡({Jv:v∈V}∪{Kf:f∈F})>0, and in particular is at least m. On a uniform L×L square torus with L≥3 and couplings Jv=J>0, Kf=K>0, the exact gap is 2min⁡(J,K).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite edge-qubit cellulation K of a closed, connected, orientable genus-g surface, positive couplings, and the adopted Axiom of Choice.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice). It is used here only through the surface Euler-characteristic corollary [F2].

[F1]

Toric-code edge spins on closed-surface cellulations: Av=X(∂1Tv) and Bf=Z(∂2f) are self-adjoint involutions, ∂1∂2=0, the primal and dual graphs are connected, and the Hamiltonian is the sum of the corresponding positive penalty terms.

[F2]

Euler characteristic of an orientable compact surface: under [A1], the finite cell count satisfies ∣V∣−∣E∣+∣F∣=2−2g.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Since ∂1∂2=0, the supports of Av and Bf overlap in even parity, so they commute. Each is a self-adjoint involution; hence (I−Av)/2 and (I−Bf)/2 are commuting orthogonal projections. Multiplication by the positive coefficients makes each summand positive semidefinite.

1.2F1algebra

The product of all vertex operators is I, because each edge has two endpoint incidences counted modulo two. The product of all face operators is I, because the closed surface has two incident face sides at each edge. Therefore any simultaneous joint eigenvalue assignment has an even number of violated vertex constraints and an even number of violated face constraints.

1.3F1algebra

The image of ∂1 is the even-parity subspace of F2V: every edge boundary has even parity, while for a fixed vertex v0, a path to each v≠v0 has boundary v+v0, and these vectors span that subspace. Thus rank⁡∂1=∣V∣−1. A vertex coefficient vector lies in ker⁡∂1T exactly when it is orthogonal to this even-parity subspace; this orthogonal complement consists of the constant vectors and has dimension one. Rank-nullity gives rank⁡∂1T=∣V∣−1, the number of independent vertex stabilizers. A face 2-chain is in ker⁡∂2 exactly when its coefficients agree across adjacent faces; dual-graph connectedness makes this kernel the one-dimensional constant subspace, so rank⁡∂2=∣F∣−1, the number of independent face stabilizers. Hence the combined stabilizer group has rank r=∣V∣+∣F∣−2.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.3algebra

Choose independent generators S1,…,Sr from those commuting involutions and set Π=2−r∏j=1r(I+Sj). This is an orthogonal projection. Independence of the vertex and face support vectors implies that its 2r Pauli terms are distinct and only the all-identity term is the identity matrix. Every other Pauli term has trace zero because at least one tensor factor is X, Z, or XZ, each of which has trace zero. Thus Tr⁡Π=2−r2∣E∣>0, so the common +1 eigenspace is nonzero and has dimension 2∣E∣−r. Each penalty is an orthogonal projection by step 1.1, and for every ψ the quadratic form is ⟨ψ,HKψ⟩=∑v∈VJv∥I−Av2ψ∥2+∑f∈FKf∥I−Bf2ψ∥2. Positivity of every coupling makes this quantity zero exactly when every penalty annihilates ψ, equivalently when every stabilizer has eigenvalue +1. Thus ker⁡HK is the common +1 eigenspace, the Hamiltonian is frustration free, and its ground space has dimension 2∣E∣−r.

2.2givenstep 1.2algebra

Put m=min⁡({Jv}∪{Kf}). The commuting self-adjoint penalty projections have a common orthonormal eigenbasis: diagonalize one projection and restrict the remaining commuting projections to each invariant eigenspace, iterating over the finite family. Thus every eigenvalue of HK occurs on a joint eigenvector. Outside the ground space, such a vector violates at least one constraint; by the two product identities of step 1.2, at least two constraints of that same type are violated. Each contributes at least m, so every excited eigenvalue is at least 2m above the ground energy zero. If the orthogonal complement of the ground space is zero, the stated +∞ convention applies.

3.1A1F2step 2.1algebra

The dimension found in step 2.1 is 2∣E∣−∣V∣−∣F∣+2. By [F2], under [A1], ∣V∣−∣E∣+∣F∣=2−2g, so ∣E∣−∣V∣−∣F∣+2=2g. Therefore the ground-space dimension is 22g.

4.1F1step 2.2construct∎

On the uniform square torus, applying Z on one edge to any ground vector flips exactly the two distinct endpoint vertex eigenvalues and no face eigenvalue, giving an excited vector of energy 2J. Applying X on one edge flips exactly the two adjacent face eigenvalues and no vertex eigenvalue, giving an excited vector of energy 2K. The lower bound of step 2.2 is 2min⁡(J,K), and one of these two constructions attains it. Thus the exact first-excitation cost is 2min⁡(J,K).

Remarks

The gap statement concerns the exact finite commuting-projector Hamiltonian. No perturbation-stability, thermodynamic-limit, or empirical claim is asserted.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Disk-supported Pauli centralizers are stabilizers

Physical scope

Pure finite-dimensional mathematics on the unperturbed square-torus stabilizer model; no perturbation stability claim.

Statement

Let KL be the square L×L torus cellulation with L≥3. For a,b∈F2E, let P(a,b)=X(a)Z(b), where X(a)=⨂eXae and Z(b)=⨂eZbe. Suppose its edge support is contained in a disk whose complement contains primal cycles p1,p2 and dual cycles q1,q2 with I(pi,qj)=δij. Write Av=X(∂1Tv) and Bf=Z(∂2f). If P(a,b) commutes with every Av and Bf, then there are vertex and face chains u∈F2V and w∈F2F such that a=∂1Tu and b=∂2w. Consequently P(a,b) is a product of the vertex and face stabilizers.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The square L×L torus model of Toric-code edge spins on closed-surface cellulations, L≥3, and a Pauli string P(a,b) satisfying the support and commutation hypotheses.

[F1]

Toric-code edge spins on closed-surface cellulations: C2=F2F→∂2C1=F2E→∂1C0=F2V, with ∂1∂2=0; Av=X(∂1Tv), Bf=Z(∂2f); the square torus has L2 vertices, 2L2 edges, L2 faces, and primal/dual cycles with intersection matrix I(pi,qj)=δij.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Commutation of P(a,b) with every Av gives b⋅∂1Tv=0 for every vertex basis vector v, hence ∂1b=0. Commutation with every Bf gives a⋅∂2f=0 for every face basis vector f, hence ∂2Ta=0.

1.2givenF1algebra

The image of ∂1 is the even-parity subspace of C0: each edge boundary has even parity, while a path from a fixed vertex v0 to any v≠v0 has boundary v+v0, and these vectors span that subspace. Thus rank⁡∂1=∣V∣−1. A 2-chain lies in ker⁡∂2 exactly when its coefficients agree across every adjacent pair of faces; dual-graph connectedness makes these coefficients constant, so dim⁡ker⁡∂2=1 and rank⁡∂2=∣F∣−1. Rank-nullity gives dim⁡H1(KL;F2)=∣E∣−(∣V∣−1)−(∣F∣−1)=2. The mod-two intersection pairing with a closed dual cycle vanishes on every face boundary, since each face boundary meets that closed dual cycle an even number of times; it is therefore well defined on H1. The matrix I(pi,qj)=δij proves that p1,p2 are independent; by the dimension calculation they form a basis, and q1,q2 detect the two coefficients of every homology class.

2.1givenF1step 1.2

Since b is a cycle and its support is disjoint from q1,q2, its two intersection numbers vanish. The intersection matrix and the two-dimensionality in step 1.2 imply that b has zero homology class; by the definition of H1=ker⁡∂1/im⁡∂2, there is a face chain w with b=∂2w.

2.2givenF1step 1.2algebra

The cochain a vanishes on p1,p2 because its support is disjoint from them. It also vanishes on every boundary ∂2w′ because ∂2Ta=0. Since p1,p2 represent a basis of H1, every 1-cycle is a sum of their representatives and a boundary; hence a vanishes on every 1-cycle. Define ϕ on im⁡∂1 by ϕ(∂1c)=a⋅c. This is well defined because two chains with the same boundary differ by a cycle, on which a vanishes. Extend ϕ linearly to C0 by extending a basis of the finite-dimensional subspace im⁡∂1. Then a=∂1Tϕ, so take u=ϕ.

3.1F1step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

By a=∂1Tu and b=∂2w, X(a) is the product of Av over vertices with uv=1, and Z(b) is the product of Bf over faces with wf=1. Therefore P(a,b)=X(a)Z(b) is the product of those vertex and face stabilizers.

Remarks

The disk and complement condition is essential to this argument: it makes local cycles pair trivially with both complementary dual generators and local cocycles vanish on both complementary primal generators. The lemma concerns the exact unperturbed stabilizer algebra only.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Crossing strings and local scalar compression

Physical scope

Exact finite square-torus stabilizer algebra only; no perturbation-stability or thermodynamic-limit claim.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and use the square L×L torus cellulation, L≥3. A closed primal Z string and a closed dual X string commute or anticommute according to the parity of their edge crossings: their commutator sign is (−1)I, where I is the mod-two intersection number. Let P0 be the orthogonal projection onto the common +1 eigenspace of all vertex and face stabilizers. For any operator O supported on an edge set contained in a disk whose complement contains the coordinate cycles p1,p2,q1,q2 specified in the definition, there is a scalar λ(O)∈C such that P0OP0=λ(O)P0. This is exact local indistinguishability for the unperturbed finite Hamiltonian.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A square L×L torus with L≥3, the toric-code operators of the definition, the common ground projection P0, and the Axiom of Choice inherited by the ground-space theorem.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), used only through the surface Euler-characteristic input in [F2].

[F1]

Toric-code edge spins on closed-surface cellulations: X(a)Z(b) is the canonical Pauli basis; Av=X(∂1Tv), Bf=Z(∂2f); primal and dual crossing parity is the mod-two intersection number.

[F2]

Commuting stabilizers and topological degeneracy: under [A1], the common +1 eigenspace is nonzero, is the ground space, and has dimension 22g.

[F3]

Disk-supported Pauli centralizers are stabilizers: a Pauli string supported on the stated disk-local set and commuting with every stabilizer is a product of stabilizers.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

On each edge, XZ=−ZX, while Pauli operators on distinct edges commute. Moving the X factors of a dual string past the Z factors of a primal string therefore contributes one minus sign for each shared crossed edge. The total sign is (−1)I, with I the number of crossings modulo two.

1.2givenA1F1F2algebra

Let T⊆E be a finite edge support for O contained in the disk from the statement. On one edge, I,X,Z,XZ are four linearly independent matrices in the four-dimensional space M2(C); their tensor products indexed by a,b∈F2T form a basis of the matrix algebra on (C2)⊗T. Extend a,b by zero on E∖T and expand O=∑a,bca,bX(a)Z(b) in that basis. For a Pauli term Q that anticommutes with some stabilizer S, the ground projection satisfies P0S=SP0=P0 and SQ=−QS. Hence P0QP0=P0SQP0=−P0QSP0=−P0QP0, so P0QP0=0.

2.1givenA1F2F3step 1.2algebra∎

Every Pauli term in the expansion either anticommutes with a stabilizer, and has zero compression by step 1.2, or commutes with every stabilizer. In the latter case [F3] writes it as a product of stabilizers; each acts as the identity on the range of P0, so its compression is P0. Summing the finitely many compressed terms gives P0OP0=λ(O)P0 for the sum of their coefficients.

Remarks

The proof is independent of the diagram. The picture shows one representative pair of fundamental cycles on the square fundamental domain; opposite sides are identified, the blue solid path is primal, and the red dashed path is dual.

p1q1left/rightandtop/bottomsidesareidenti¯ed

At the displayed crossing the primal and dual strings meet on one edge, so their intersection parity is one and their Pauli strings anticommute. A diagram illustrates the convention; it supplies no proof step. No perturbation-stability claim follows from this exact compression identity.

4 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources