Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Toric-code Hamiltonians and local indistinguishability — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

4 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Open strings create endpoint defects

Physical scope

Finite-dimensional example in the exact unperturbed toric-code Hamiltonian; no empirical or perturbative claim.

Example

On a finite connected toric-code cellulation, let γ be a primal path that visits no vertex twice and has distinct endpoint vertices v1,v2, and let γ∗ be a dual path that visits no face twice and has distinct endpoint faces f1,f2. Acting on any ground vector, the Z string along γ flips exactly the endpoint eigenvalues Av1,Av2 and raises the energy by Jv1+Jv2. The X string along γ∗ flips exactly Bf1,Bf2 and raises the energy by Kf1+Kf2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite Hamiltonian and open-string conventions of Toric-code edge spins on closed-surface cellulations, together with the path hypotheses in the statement.

[F1]

Toric-code edge spins on closed-surface cellulations: C2=F2F→∂2C1=F2E→∂1C0=F2V with ∂1∂2=0; use the coordinate pairing ⟨r,s⟩=∑e∈Erese in F2, and the dual graph's mod-two incidence map is ∂2T:F2E→F2F; the commuting self-adjoint involutions are Av=X(∂1Tv) and Bf=Z(∂2f); the finite edge Hilbert space is (C2)⊗E; and HK is the sum of the positive penalties Jv(I−Av)/2 and Kf(I−Bf)/2.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

The operators Av,Bf are commuting self-adjoint involutions by [F1], so Π=∏v∈V(I+Av)/2∏f∈F(I+Bf)/2 is the orthogonal projection onto their common +1 eigenspace. Expand this finite product. Each term is a tensor-product Pauli X(a)Z(b) with coefficient +1: factors of the same type multiply without phases, and every vertex operator commutes with every face operator. For the ordinary matrix trace on HK, the trace of a tensor product is the product of the factor traces. A nonidentity Pauli therefore has trace zero because at least one edge factor is X, Z, or XZ, each of which has trace zero; an identity term has trace 2∣E∣. The empty subset contributes one identity term and no term contributes negative trace, so Tr⁡Π≥2∣E∣−∣V∣−∣F∣>0. Thus Π≠0. Since each penalty is an orthogonal projection and the couplings are positive, for every ψ the quadratic form is ⟨ψ,HKψ⟩=∑v∈VJv∥I−Av2ψ∥2+∑f∈FKf∥I−Bf2ψ∥2. This is zero exactly when every penalty annihilates ψ, equivalently when every stabilizer has eigenvalue +1. Hence ker⁡HK is the common +1 eigenspace and is nonzero, so it contains a ground vector of energy zero.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

Let b∈F2E be the edge chain of the primal path γ. Because the path visits no vertex twice and has distinct endpoints, each internal vertex has even path incidence and the endpoints have odd incidence, so ∂1b=v1+v2. For each vertex v, Z(b)Av=(−1)⟨b,∂1Tv⟩AvZ(b)=(−1)(∂1b)vAvZ(b); Z(b) commutes with every Bf. Hence applying Z(b) to any ground vector flips exactly Av1 and Av2 from +1 to −1 and leaves every other stabilizer eigenvalue unchanged.

2.2givenF1step 1.1algebra

Regard the dual path γ∗ as a path in the dual graph whose vertices are faces, and let a∈F2E indicate the primal edges crossed by its dual edges. By the definition of the dual incidence map as ∂2T, the no-repeated-face hypothesis and distinct endpoint faces give ∂2Ta=f1+f2. For each face f, X(a)Bf=(−1)⟨a,∂2f⟩BfX(a)=(−1)(∂2Ta)fBfX(a); X(a) commutes with every Av. Hence applying X(a) to any ground vector flips exactly Bf1 and Bf2 and leaves every other stabilizer eigenvalue unchanged.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

By step 2.1, the vector Z(b)ψ has eigenvalue −1 precisely for the two vertex stabilizers at v1,v2 and eigenvalue +1 for every other stabilizer, when ψ is a ground vector. Thus the only nonzero terms in HKZ(b)ψ are the penalties Jvi(I−Avi)/2, each acting as multiplication by Jvi; its HK-eigenvalue, and hence its energy increase from the ground eigenvalue zero, is Jv1+Jv2.

4.1F1step 2.2algebra∎

By step 2.2, the vector X(a)ψ has eigenvalue −1 precisely for Bf1,Bf2 and eigenvalue +1 for every other stabilizer, when ψ is a ground vector. Therefore only the two penalties Kfi(I−Bfi)/2 contribute, and its HK-eigenvalue, hence energy increase from zero, is Kf1+Kf2.

Remarks

The diagram shows one three-edge primal path on a square-torus patch. Red endpoint markers denote the two flipped vertex constraints; blue edges denote the Z string. It illustrates the parity calculation and is not used in the proof.

v1v2Z°

Sources