Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quotient manifold by a closed Lie subgroup

Statement

Assume ACω. If H is a closed subgroup of a finite-dimensional real Lie group G, then the left-coset space G/H, with its quotient topology, has a unique smooth manifold structure for which

q:G⟶G/H,q(g)=gH,

is a surjective submersion and the left G-action is smooth. Moreover, dim⁡(G/H)=dim⁡G−dim⁡H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a finite-dimensional real Lie group G, and a closed subgroup H≤G.

[A1]

Under countable choice, H has its unique embedded Lie-subgroup structure. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), Cartan closed subgroup theorem.

[F1]

A finite-dimensional subspace admits a linear projection, without any additional choice. Finite-dimensional subspaces admit projections without Choice.

[F2]

A smooth map with invertible differential is a local diffeomorphism. The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds.

[F3]

The exponential map is smooth and has identity differential at zero. The Lie-group exponential map is smooth with identity differential at zero.

[F5]

A smooth submersion has local projection form and therefore admits a smooth local section near each point in its image; a surjective submersion therefore has such a section near every target point. The constant-rank theorem for manifolds.

Proof

technique · local complements and translated quotient charts
1.1A1F1

By [A1], put g=TeG and h=TeH. By [F1], choose a linear projection of g onto h and put m equal to its kernel, so g=m⊕h.

1.2givenF4algebra

Give G/H the quotient topology. The map q is open, since q−1(q(O))=OH=⋃h∈HOh for every open O⊆G. It is Hausdorff: the orbit relation R={(g1,g2):g1−1g2∈H} is closed, and for two inequivalent points choose a product neighborhood O1×O2 disjoint from R; the open sets q(O1) and q(O2) are then disjoint. Images of a countable basis of G form a countable basis of G/H.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

Define Ψ:m×H→G by Ψ(X,h)=exp⁡(X)h. By [F3], its differential at (0,e) is (X,Y)↦X+Y, an isomorphism by step 1.1. By [F2], after restricting to neighborhoods W⊆m and V⊆H, Ψ is a diffeomorphism W×V→U, where U is an identity neighborhood.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Shrink W and U so that if X,Y∈W and exp⁡(X)−1exp⁡(Y)∈H, then this element lies in V. This is possible by continuity at (0,0). Uniqueness in the product chart then gives X=Y. Hence S=exp⁡(W) meets each left coset represented in U exactly once. Also q(U)=q(S), because Ψ(X,h)H=exp⁡(X)H.

4.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1

The bijection q∣S:S→q(U) from step 3.1 is a homeomorphism. Indeed, q∣S is continuous. If A=exp⁡(B)⊆S is open, with B⊆W open, then Ψ(B×V) is open in G and has quotient image exactly q(A); openness of q from step 1.2 makes q(A) open. Thus X↦exp⁡(X)H is a chart from W onto q(U). In this chart and the product chart of step 2.1, q is (X,h)↦X.

5.1step 2.1step 4.1constructalgebra

Translate this chart: for g∈G, use gS over q(gU). Fix a coset in q(gU)∩q(g′U), represented in the first chart by z=gexp⁡(X0). Since its coset is also represented in g′U, there is h0∈H with zh0∈g′U. The set g′U is open, so for X in a neighbourhood of X0 inside the first chart, gexp⁡(X)h0∈g′U. Apply the inverse of the translated product diffeomorphism g′Ψ:W×V→g′U to this smooth representative and take its m-component. Right multiplication by the fixed h0 does not change the coset, so this component is exactly the second-chart coordinate of q(gexp⁡X). It is smooth near X0; reversing the roles of g,g′ proves the reverse transition smooth. These charts therefore form a smooth atlas. By step 4.1, q is locally a projection and hence a surjective submersion of rank dim⁡m. Thus dim⁡(G/H)=dim⁡m=dim⁡G−dim⁡H.

6.1step 5.1algebra

The action map a:G×G/H→G/H is smooth. Near any (g0,x0), choose a local smooth section s of q around x0 from step 5.1. There a(g,x)=q(gs(x)), a composite of smooth maps. This expression is independent of the lift because q(gsh)=q(gs).

7.1A1F3F5step 5.1∎

Suppose another smooth structure with the same quotient topology makes q a surjective submersion. By [F5], that submersion and the constructed one have smooth local sections. On a neighborhood carrying a section s of the constructed quotient, the identity from the constructed quotient to the other one is qother∘s; using a section s′ of the other quotient gives qconstructed∘s′ in the reverse direction. Hence the identity is a diffeomorphism, proving uniqueness. If H=G the quotient is a point; if H={e} the construction recovers G. Disconnected and zero-dimensional groups are included. Countable choice is used through [A1] and [F3]. The finite-dimensional projection, inverse-function, quotient-topology, and constant-rank arguments add no choice.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources