How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Riesz-Fischer completeness of for
Statement
Assume countable choice (in particular, the Axiom of Choice suffices). Let be a measure space and let . Then , with its quotient norm, is complete. Equivalently, every Cauchy sequence in the metric induced by that norm converges in .
Moreover, if a sequence in converges in norm, then some subsequence admits measurable representatives converging almost everywhere relative to .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A measure space, an exponent , and countable choice, available under the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Its only use is to select a countable family of measurable representatives.
is a normed space, so it has the norm metric (The norm descends to the quotient and makes a normed space for , Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space).
Minkowski's inequality holds in (Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including ).
Monotone convergence and dominated convergence are available (Monotone convergence for the integral, Dominated convergence).
Pointwise limits of measurable functions are measurable (Sequential suprema, infima, limsup, liminf, and pointwise limits of measurable functions are measurable).
Sums and absolute values of measurable functions are measurable (Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral).
Countable unions of measurable null sets are measurable and null (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures).
Finite essential suprema are attained almost everywhere (The essential supremum is attained as the least essential bound).
Proof
Assume and let be Cauchy in . Choose by least indices a strictly increasing sequence such that [L2, L3, L4, L5, given, choose] Use countable choice (the countable instance of AC) to choose measurable representatives of , and put . Then each is measurable, belongs to , and satisfies If , then so each lies in . Monotone convergence then gives a measurable pointwise limit with .
Assume now and let be Cauchy in . Choose least indices with [L4, L6, L7, given, choose] Use countable choice (the countable instance of AC) to choose measurable representatives of . By [L7], the explicitly defined measurable set is null, and With , [L6] makes measurable and null, and for and , So is Cauchy in , hence converges to some value . Set on . The measurable functions equal to on and zero on converge everywhere to , so [L4] makes measurable. Indeed, their inverse images of Borel sets are obtained by intersecting those of with and adjoining exactly when the Borel set contains zero. No completeness of the measure is assumed.
In the finite- case, is measurable and null: for every , , hence . On the series converges, so has a finite limit . Set on . Replacing each by zero on gives measurable functions converging everywhere to , so [L4] gives measurability. Almost everywhere, , so [L2] gives , and [step 1.1, L2, L3, L4] Dominated convergence in [L3] therefore gives . So the subsequence converges to , and its representatives converge to almost everywhere.
For , the same tail estimate gives [step 1.2] Taking also gives almost everywhere, so . Therefore . Given , choose with for , then choose with and . Hence so in .
Since is Cauchy, for every there is with whenever . Choose with and from step 2.1. Then for every , [step 2.1, L2] So the whole sequence converges to . This proves completeness for .
Step 2.1 proves the almost-everywhere convergent subsequence clause in the finite- case, and step 2.2 gives the same for . Steps 3.1 and 2.2 prove completeness in every case, which by [L1] is exactly completeness of the norm metric.
Depends on
The norm descends to the quotient and makes a normed space for
Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including
Monotone convergence for the integral
Dominated convergence
Sequential suprema, infima, limsup, liminf, and pointwise limits of measurable functions are measurable
Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space
Convergence almost everywhere relative to a measure
Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral
Finite and countable subadditivity of measures
The essential supremum is attained as the least essential bound
The Axiom of Choice