How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures
Statement
Assume Dependent Choice. If two Radon measures and on an LCH space satisfy for every , then on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain); are Radon and agree on all integrals.
Under Dependent Choice, LCH cutoffs exist between compact and open sets (LCH Urysohn cutoff). Applying this supplier in step 1.1 is the use of DC here.
Proof
If with compact and open, choose by [L1]. Then Taking the infimum over gives by outer regularity; symmetry gives equality on compact sets.
Inner regularity on open sets now gives for every open . Outer regularity on Borel sets then gives for every Borel , including infinite values.