Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rouche's theorem in the classical strict-inequality form

Statement

Let Ω⊆C be open, let γ be a closed complex contour that is null-homologous in Ω, and let f,g be holomorphic on Ω. If

∣f(z)−g(z)∣<∣g(z)∣(z∈γ∗),

then f and g have the same weighted number of zeros with respect to γ.

In particular, if γ is the positively oriented boundary of a Jordan domain, then f and g have the same number of zeros inside γ, counted with multiplicity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open set Ω, a closed complex contour γ that is null-homologous in Ω, and holomorphic functions f,g on Ω satisfying ∣f−g∣<∣g∣ on γ∗.

[L1]

For a closed contour on which a meromorphic function does not vanish, the integral of f′/f is the winding number of the image contour about 0 (The argument-principle integral is the winding number of the image cycle).

[L2]

The argument principle at w=0 counts zeros of a holomorphic function with multiplicity and no pole term (The argument principle counts preimages of a target value).

[L3]

If φ(ζ,t) is continuous in (ζ,t) and holomorphic in the complex parameter t, then ∫γφ(ζ,t) dζ is holomorphic in t (A contour integral of a jointly continuous, parameter-holomorphic integrand is holomorphic).

[L4]
[L5]

A holomorphic function has smooth real coordinate functions, so it and the real partial derivatives giving its complex derivative are continuous (Holomorphic functions are real analytic and smooth in their two real coordinates).

[L6]

A holomorphic function whose derivative is zero on a nonempty connected open set is constant there (A holomorphic function with zero derivative on a domain is constant).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenchoosealgebra

Because γ∗ is compact and ∣f−g∣<∣g∣ there, the ratio ∣f−g∣/∣g∣ has a maximum q<1 on γ∗. Choose ε>0 with (1+ε)q<1. Then for every complex t with ∣t∣<1+ε and every z∈γ∗, ∣g(z)+t(f(z)−g(z))−g(z)∣=∣t∣ ∣f(z)−g(z)∣≤(1+ε)q ∣g(z)∣<∣g(z)∣, so ht(z):=g(z)+t(f(z)−g(z)) never vanishes on γ∗.

2.1step 1.1L1L3L4L5L6algebra

For fixed z, the function φz(t):=ht′(z)ht(z)=g′(z)+t(f′(z)−g′(z))g(z)+t(f(z)−g(z)) is holomorphic on the disc ∣t∣<1+ε by step 1.1. The numerator and denominator are jointly continuous in (z,t) on the contour trace times that disc: [L5] supplies continuity of f,g,f′,g′, and step 1.1 makes the denominator nonzero. Therefore J(t):=12πi∫γht′(z)ht(z) dz is holomorphic there by [L3]. For every complex t in this disc, ht is holomorphic in z and nonzero on the contour by step 1.1, so [L1] gives J(t)=n(ht∘γ,0), and [L4] makes that an integer. By [L5], J is continuous. At any t0 in the disc, continuity supplies a neighbourhood where ∣J(t)−J(t0)∣<1; two distinct integers differ in modulus by at least 1, so J(t)=J(t0) there. Thus J is locally constant and J′(t0)=0. The disc is a nonempty connected open set (indeed convex), so [L6] makes J constant on the entire disc.

3.1step 2.1L2∎

Since h0=g and h1=f, step 2.1 gives 12πi∫γg′(z)g(z) dz=12πi∫γf′(z)f(z) dz. Applying [L2] to both sides shows that f and g have the same weighted zero count with respect to γ.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources