Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Change of variable in an improper integral

Statement

Let I and J be intervals, possibly open at finite or infinite singular ends, and let ϕ:I→J be a monotone differentiable surjection. Assume ϕ′ is locally Riemann integrable and the proper change-of-variable hypotheses hold on every compact truncation. If f is locally Riemann integrable on J, then ∫Jf(x) dxand∫If(ϕ(t))∣ϕ′(t)∣ dt converge simultaneously and, when convergent, are equal. At several singular ends this assertion is applied separately to the corresponding ends; orientation is retained for decreasing parametrizations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The intervals, monotone surjection ϕ, and locally integrable f in the statement.

[L1]

The proper change-of-variable theorem gives equality on corresponding compact truncations (Monotone change of variable for Riemann-integrable functions).

[L2]

Monotonicity and surjectivity send truncations tending to an endpoint of I to truncations tending to the corresponding endpoint of J.

[L3]

Improper convergence at one end is the existence of a finite limit of the corresponding compact-truncation values (Improper integrals over unbounded intervals, Improper integrals at a finite singular endpoint).

[L4]

Mixed improper integrals require separate convergence at every singular end (Improper integrals with several singular ends).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1

On each compact source truncation [u,v]⊂I, [L1] gives [L1] ∫ϕ([u,v])f=∫uv(f∘ϕ)∣ϕ′∣, with the endpoint order adjusted when ϕ decreases.

2.1step 1.1L2L3

By [L2], the two sides form the same family of values as the corresponding truncation approaches a singular end. Since they are equal term by term by step 1.1, the epsilon condition in [L3] holds for one family exactly when it holds for the other, with the same limit.

3.1L4step 2.1∎

For multiple ends, apply step 2.1 separately at each matched end and add only after all pieces converge, as [L4] requires. The oriented convention supplies the sign for a decreasing parametrization.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources