How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The local nonsingular codimension-one Pfaff–Frobenius theorem
Statement
Let , , be open and let be a one-form with at . Relabel coordinates so one coefficient is nonzero at and shrink to a neighborhood where it stays nonzero. The following conditions, both local at , are equivalent: (i) there is a neighborhood of on which ; (ii) there is a neighborhood of and nowhere zero and with on . The theorem gives no global exactness or thermodynamic calibration.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The open Euclidean domain, the coefficient regularity, and nonsingularity near .
A nonsingular Pfaff one-form and its horizontal paths: is a covector and is its rank- horizontal subspace; and the alternating products are the stated coordinate forms.
Local flows by a contraction argument: a vector field has a unique local flow with local inverse and Lipschitz dependence.
Variational equations and commuting local flows: for fields, local flows are and commute when their bracket vanishes.
An exact nonzero multiple satisfies the Pfaff condition: with and nowhere-zero implies .
The chain rule for total derivatives: : the derivative of a composition is the composition of derivatives.
Local graph form at a nonsingular derivative minor (the current carrier is draft, inventoried on the batch-4 A page, order 268): for , is , , and some minor of is invertible; if , after permuting , there are open neighborhoods and a unique graph equivalent to . Its inspected proof reduces to the published Euclidean implicit-function theorem in the case and to the published inverse-function theorem when . In this use and , and the solved-coordinate minor is ; the interface matches. The rank carrier's proof contract and dependencies pass scoped checks, but its phase-number precheck reports a canonical-label repair and its Step1 readiness record is missing, so this cross-batch use remains conditional.
Proof
Given: Translate to . Restrict all fields and flows to a sufficiently small coordinate neighborhood of .
For (i)(ii), assume (i) on a neighborhood of and shrink the working coordinate neighborhood to lie inside it.
Since , one coordinate coefficient is nonzero at ; relabel that coordinate as and shrink the neighborhood so . Put and . Then , , and the are a basis of because their first components form the standard basis.
Define . Coordinate expansion of the displayed formula for gives . Thus for horizontal fields . Also has zero -components, hence is vertical. Evaluating the three-form on gives . Under (i), ; then , and a vertical vector has , so .
By [F2]–[F3] and step 1.2, the fields have commuting local flows . Define for near . Each changes only , at rate one, so the first coordinates of are exactly . Commutation and the transported-field identity in [F3] give . At the columns of are ; their first components form and the last column is , so is invertible.
Let . On an open product neighborhood of where is defined, set . Then and its -derivative is invertible. Apply [L1] with ambient dimension and target dimension , permuting the input coordinates to so the block is free and the solved block has the invertible minor: conditionally, the zero set is the graph of a unique local map , so . Since is , differentiating this identity by [F5] gives and hence . The right side is (matrix inverse entries are cofactors divided by the nonzero determinant), so is .
Let be the last coordinate of . Then , , and ; after shrinking, . Differentiating along gives , so . Thus is and nowhere zero. This proves (ii), conditionally on [L1].
Conversely, if (ii) holds, [F4] gives on that neighborhood, proving (i).
Remarks
The proof builds a local potential by commuting flows, rather than inferring a global entropy. A nonzero period on a punctured domain can obstruct a global potential even when a local integrating factor exists. If a physical theory later identifies with entropy, its sign, units, and physical meaning require separate hypotheses and calibration.