Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local horizontal inaccessibility and Pfaff integrability

Statement

Let U⊆Rn+1, n≥1, be open and let ω be a nowhere-zero C2 one-form. Suppose horizontal paths and local reachability are as in A nonsingular Pfaff one-form and its horizontal paths. The following are equivalent: (a) for every q∈U and every open neighborhood V of q contained in U, some p∈V is not horizontally reachable from q by a path contained in V; (b) every q∈U has a neighborhood W and μ∈C1(W) nowhere zero, S∈C2(W) with dS=μω. Both conditions are local. This is a mathematical theorem about the declared horizontal-path relation; identifying that relation with physical adiabatic processes is an additional modeling assumption.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open domain, the nowhere-zero C2 one-form, and the stated two-sided, finite-piece horizontal paths.

[F1]

A nonsingular Pfaff one-form and its horizontal paths: after a coordinate permutation one may write ω=∑iaidxi+bdz with b≠0 locally; horizontal paths are piecewise C1 curves with ω(γ˙)=0, and reachability is by finite concatenations within the chosen open set.

[F2]

Local flows by a contraction argument: local flows exist uniquely, are locally Lipschitz in initial data, and both signs of sufficiently small time are available.

[F3]

Variational equations and commuting local flows: C2 local flows satisfy the variational equation and the bracket uses [X,Y]=DY X−DX Y.

[F4]

The local nonsingular codimension-one Pfaff–Frobenius theorem: condition ω∧dω=0 is equivalent locally to dS=μω with S∈C2 and nowhere-zero μ∈C1. Its assigned proof uses the same batch-4 rank carrier below, so this step is conditional while that carrier's precheck repair and Step1 record remain unresolved.

[L1]

Local graph form at a nonsingular derivative minor (the current carrier is draft, inventoried on the batch-4 A page, order 268): for 1≤q≤m, F:O⊆Rm→Rq is C1, F(x∗)=0, and some q×q minor of DF(x∗) is invertible; if q<m, after permuting x=(u,v)∈Rm−q×Rq, there are open neighborhoods and a unique C1 graph v=φ(u) equivalent to F(u,v)=0. Its inspected proof reduces to the published Euclidean implicit-function theorem in the q<m case and to the published inverse-function theorem when q=m. In this use m=2(n+1) and q=n+1<m, and the solved-coordinate minor is DΨt(0); the interface matches. The rank carrier's proof contract and dependencies pass scoped checks, but its phase-number precheck reports a canonical-label repair and its Step1 readiness record is missing, so this cross-batch use remains conditional.

[F8]

Horizontal orbits under local first integrals have empty interior: if every point has a local nowhere-zero integrating factor and first integral, then the horizontal reachability class of any q fails to exhaust every nonempty open subset of U, without a global first integral or choice axiom.

[F9]

A subset of R is connected if and only if it is order-convex, that is, an interval: the order-convex interval [0,1] is connected, so it cannot be separated into two nonempty relatively open subsets.

Proof

Given: Near each point permute coordinates to use z for a coordinate with nonzero coefficient, and shrink to a ball where it remains nonzero.

For (a)⇒(b), assume (a) and fix q0∈U; we prove (b) near this arbitrary point.

1.1F1algebra

Put ci=−ai/b and Xi=∂xi+ci∂z. These C2 fields form a basis of ker⁡ω. Their bracket has only a vertical component, [Xi,Xj]z=∂icj+ci∂zcj−∂jci−cj∂zci.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Direct coordinate expansion gives dω(X,Y)=X[ω(Y)]−Y[ω(X)]−ω([X,Y]) for [X,Y]=DY X−DX Y. Suppose for contradiction that [Xi,Xj](q)≠0 at some q. For small t, let Yt=(ϕit)∗Xj, so Yt(q)=Dϕit(ϕi−t(q))Xj(ϕi−t(q)). The flow and variational equations give ϕi−t(q)=q−tXi(q)+o(t) and Dϕit(ϕi−t(q))=I+tDXi(q)+o(t); differentiability of Xj gives Xj(ϕi−t(q))=Xj(q)−tDXj(q)Xi(q)+o(t). Multiplying yields Yt(q)=Xj(q)−t[Xi,Xj](q)+o(t). Since [Xi,Xj](q)=v∂z for some v≠0 and b(q)≠0, ωq([Xi,Xj](q))=vb(q)≠0; hence ωq(Yt(q))=−tvb(q)+o(t)≠0 for all sufficiently small nonzero t, so Yt(q) is transverse to ker⁡ωq. Thus X1(q),…,Xn(q),Yt(q) are linearly independent.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1construct

By continuity, choose an open Euclidean ball B about q, contained in the coordinate neighborhood, on which b and the vertical coefficient of the same bracket [Xi,Xj] are both nonzero. For each r∈B, repeat step 2.1 at r with a sufficiently small nonzero t=tr. The flow of Yt is ϕit∘ϕjs∘ϕi−t, a finite horizontal concatenation with both time signs available. Starting at r, compose this flow with those of X1,…,Xn to obtain a C2 endpoint map Ψr near the zero duration vector. Then Ψr(0)=r and its derivative has the independent columns X1(r),…,Xn(r),Yt(r). Choose ∣t∣ and the duration neighborhood small enough that every intermediate segment stays inside B, using continuity of local flows and that r is interior to B.

4.1F1F3F9L1step 3.1algebra

At each r∈B, apply [L1] to Hr(s,p)=Ψr(s)−p at (0,r), with ambient dimension 2(n+1) and target dimension n+1, permuting the input to (p,s) so s is solved. Its solved derivative is invertible by step 3.1. Conditionally, some open neighborhood Or⊆B of r consists of endpoints Ψr(s(p)), all reachable from r by horizontal paths inside B. Reachability inside B is an equivalence relation: constant paths give reflexivity, path reversal gives symmetry, and finite concatenation gives transitivity. Every equivalence class is open in B, since each of its points r has Or in that same class. If there were more than one class, one class and the union of all other classes would be disjoint nonempty open subsets covering B. Write B=B(c,R). It is convex: for x,y∈B and 0≤λ≤1, the triangle inequality gives ∥(1−λ)x+λy−c∥≤(1−λ)∥x−c∥+λ∥y−c∥<R. Choose a point in each set and join them by their straight segment, which lies in B by this calculation; the preimages of the class and its complement would separate [0,1] into two nonempty relatively open sets, contradicting [F9]. Hence B is one class: every point of B is reachable from q by a path inside B, contradicting (a) with V=B.

5.1F1F4step 2.1step 4.1algebra

Thus every bracket [Xi,Xj] vanishes by the contradiction at step 4.1. The coordinate identity from step 2.1 gives dω(Xi,Xj)=−ω([Xi,Xj])=0, hence (ω∧dω)(∂z,Xi,Xj)=0 for every pair. These evaluations determine the three-form: modulo the n-plane ker⁡ω, the tangent space has dimension one, so every triple reduces by multilinearity and alternation to a multiple of one ∂z and two horizontal vectors. Therefore ω∧dω=0. By [F4], condition (b) follows, conditionally on [L1].

6.1givenF1F8∎

Conversely suppose (b) holds at every point of U. The exact global reachability lemma [F8] applies to these local first integrals and the declared horizontal paths. For every q∈U and every open neighborhood V⊆U of q, it gives a point p∈V not horizontally reachable from q even by a path in U, and therefore not by a path in V. This proves (a), including neighborhoods larger than an individual first-integral chart, and completes the equivalence.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources