Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact canonical limit on arbitrary van Hove shapes

Statement

Assume superstability and regularity, let (Ωk) be van Hove, and let Nk/∣Ωk∣→ρ for an interior attainable density ρ>0. Use the general-region free-wall convention of Free-wall pressure on arbitrary van Hove shapes under superstability, namely Z(Λ,N;β)=1N!∫{q∈ΛN:qi≠qj (i≠j)}exp⁡ ⁣(−β∑1≤i<j≤Nϕ(qi−qj))dq1⋯dqN(N≥1), with Z(Λ,0;β)=1 and e−β(+∞)=0, for bounded Lebesgue-measurable Λ⊂Rd. For the free-wall exact-Nk positional partition with this 1/Nk! normalization, ∣Ωk∣−1log⁡Z(Ωk,Nk;β)⟶Fβ(ρ), the free-cube canonical rate of Canonical free-cube limit at every interior attainable density. Superstability is used for the arbitrary-shape pressure upper bound; no stability-only upper theorem is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated interaction, van Hove sequence, β>0, and interior density.

[F1]

Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation: stability bounds canonical weights and the tail envelope is summable.

[F2]

Van Hove sequence of bounded regions: fixed-width geometric boundary layers have negligible volume.

[F3]

Canonical free-cube limit at every interior attainable density: free-cube exact-N rates converge to finite concave Fβ on the attainable interior.

[F4]

Canonical–grand-canonical thermodynamic duality: Fβ(ρ)=inf⁡α(P(α,β)−αρ).

[F5]

Free-wall pressure on arbitrary van Hove shapes under superstability: the free grand pressure on Ωk converges to the cube pressure.

[F6]

Diagonal gap for a decreasing integrable interaction tail: separated core lattice interactions have a vanishing diagonal gap bound.

Proof

Given: The assumptions and suppliers in Facts & Assumptions.

1.1F4F5algebra

For any α∈R, eαNkZ(Ωk,Nk)≤ΞΩk(eα,β). Divide by volume, use [F5], and take the infimum over α. The duality [F4] gives lim sup⁡∣Ωk∣−1log⁡Z(Ωk,Nk)≤Fβ(ρ).

1.2F2F3F6choose

Choose δ>0 so ρ−δ,ρ+δ lie in the attainable interior. For large core side ℓ, choose integers n−,n+ with n±/ℓd→ρ±δ. Put a central ℓ-cube inside each (ℓ+g)-cell, with g=g(ℓ) from [F6]. The effective densities n±/(ℓ+g)d still bracket ρ when ℓ is large.

2.1F1F2step 1.2algebra

At fixed ℓ,g, pack every complete (ℓ+g)-cell contained in Ωk. Its count Mk satisfies Mk/∣Ωk∣→(ℓ+g)−d by [F2]. Assign n+ particles to jk cores and n− to the remaining cores, except one correction core with remainder rk chosen to make the total exactly Nk. Bracketing ensures 0≤jk<Mk for large k; Euclidean division gives 0≤rk<n+−n−≤n+. Every correction integral Z(ℓ,r), 0≤r≤n+, is positive: delete particles from a positive-measure finite-energy set realizing Z(ℓ,n+)>0. There are finitely many such r, so the correction contributes Oℓ(1) to the log weight.

3.1F1F2F3F6step 2.1algebra∎

Exact assignment of labels cancels the global Nk!, leaving the product of core canonical integrals. The core lattice shell estimate bounds cross-energy per volume by CK2(ℓ/g)dη(g), where Kℓd≥n+. Let k→∞ first, then ℓ→∞. The packing fraction tends one, the cross error tends zero, and the two rates tend Fβ(ρ−δ) and Fβ(ρ+δ). The bracketing proportions tend one half, so the lower rate is at least their average. Finally δ↓0; finite concavity makes Fβ continuous at the interior density. Combined with step 1.1 this proves the limit.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources