Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The derived couple is exact

Statement

The derived data of a page-r exact couple form a page-(r+1) exact couple. In particular im⁡i′=ker⁡j′, im⁡j′=ker⁡k′ and im⁡k′=ker⁡i′, at their respective shifted vertices.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Derived exact couple and The derived couple maps are well defined supply the canonical maps of degrees (1,−1), (−r,r) and (−1,0), with rules i′(a)=ia, j′(ix)=[jx], k′([e])=ke.

[F2]

Exact couple supplies the three original exactness conditions and consecutive zero composites.

[F3]

Spectral sequence subquotient and local lifting calculus licenses local epic lifts and descent of subobject containments.

Proof

Given: The original page-r exact couple. All local representatives and subsequent lifts are obtained by finitely many epic pullbacks; after each computation subobject membership descends by [F3].

1.1F1F2F3

At Dp,q′, let a lie locally in ker⁡j′ and write a=ix with x at Dp−1,q+1. The condition [jx]=0 says locally jx=dz=jkz for z at Ep,q+1. Thus x−kz∈ker⁡j and locally x−kz=iy for y at Dp−2,q+2. It follows that a=ix=i2y, since ik=0. This belongs to im⁡i′ because iy is in Dp−1,q+1′. Conversely a local element of im⁡i′ has the form i2y and j′(i2y)=[jiy]=0. These two local containments descend to ker⁡jp,q′=im⁡ip−1,q+1′.

1.2F1F2F3

At Ep,q′, represent a local class in ker⁡k′ by a d-cycle e. Since Dp−1,q′↪Dp−1,q is monic, k′[e]=0 implies ke=0 in D. Original exactness gives locally e=jx for x at Dp+r−1,q−r+1. Then [e]=j′(ix), with ix at Dp+r,q−r′. Conversely k′j′(ix)=kjx=0. Thus ker⁡kp,q′=im⁡jp+r,q−r′ after descent.

1.3F1F2F3

At Dp,q′, let a lie in ker⁡i′. Its image in Dp,q satisfies ia=0, so locally a=ke for e at Ep+1,q. Since a already lies in D′=im⁡i, we have ja=0; therefore de=jke=ja=0. The class [e] is defined and k′[e]=a. Conversely i′k′[e]=ike=0 for every cycle class. Descending gives ker⁡ip,q′=im⁡kp+1,q′.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

These are exactly the three equalities required for page r+1, with the degrees supplied by [F1]. The arguments include zero kernels, images and homology objects: the reverse containments are zero-composite identities and never require a nonzero witness. At r=1 the shifted indices give the first derived couple; every larger page is covered by the same printed formulas. No section, global lift or axiom of choice is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources