How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Total variation is the supremum of simple integrals over unit-bounded test functions
Statement
Let be a signed measure or complex measure on and let satisfy . Then every complex simple function on with has a defined simple integral over , and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A signed measure or complex measure and a measurable set with .
Simple integrals are bounded by total variation: . (Simple integrals are bounded by total variation)
The simple integral over is computed from the measurable level-set representation of . (The simple integral against a signed or complex measure)
Every complex number has unit-modulus phase . (Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus)
The total variation is the supremum of countable partition sums . (The total variation |nu|(E) from countable measurable partitions)
Proof
Let be the canonical disjoint representation of a complex simple function using only its nonzero level sets. Every countable measurable partition of extends to one of by adding , so [L4] gives for each . Thus [L1] applies to and gives [L1] Therefore the displayed supremum is at most .
Fix . By [L4], choose a countable measurable partition [L3, L4, choose] such that Because , every term is finite. Choose so that the first terms already satisfy For each with , define , and put when . After deleting the zero-coefficient terms, the simple function satisfies .
Using [L2], [L2, step 1.2] so step 1.2 gives Because was arbitrary, the supremum is at least .
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the equality.