How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A3 relative arrangement and its six labelled chambers
PDF p. 10: Example 3.12 and diagram
Example
Take the type Coxeter system with vertices in a chain, simple reflections , simple roots , and dual basis . Let . Then . Its relative arrangement consists of the three lines , and , obtained respectively from , and .
The six chambers are the connected components of the complement of these lines. Counterclockwise from the positive quadrant, their labels are , , , , and . Here is the identity and a numeral in the second position abbreviates the corresponding singleton subset.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
The canonical representation has the stated simple-root basis, reflection formula and contragredient dual action; is the set of dual vectors vanishing on the simple roots indexed by and positive on the others. Real Coxeter representation and contragredient notation
The relative space is the common kernel of the roots indexed by , the relative cone is its intersection with the union of the closed chamber translates, and the relative arrangement consists of the distinct proper traces of root hyperplanes. Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements
A label satisfies and has of minimum length in ; its chamber is , and this assignment is a bijection to the relative chambers. Labelling theorem for relative chambers
An element is the minimum in exactly when it sends each positive root of the standard parabolic subsystem for to a positive root. Parabolic root subsystems and unique coset minima
The canonical reflection representation is faithful. The root-length criterion and faithfulness of the canonical reflection representation
Verification
Given: The type system and in the example. Goal: Verify the cone, arrangement and six labels.
Realize the root space as , with , where are the standard coordinate vectors. The linear map from the simple-root basis to these differences is an isomorphism. The reflection formula in [F1] sends to the swap of coordinates ; these swaps generate all permutations, and [F5] makes the resulting identification faithful. Consequently the roots are precisely for , and the positive roots are , , , , and .
A dual vector may be represented by a tuple , unique up to adding a common constant, with . The closed fundamental chamber is . Sorting any tuple shows that its permutation translates cover all of ; hence the Tits cone is all . The condition gives , so [F2] gives and its interior in is the same space.
In one-line permutation notation, multiplying the displayed words from right to left gives, in the stated order, , , , , and . In each row the entries at positions , where is the displayed second label, are . Therefore and is positive. Since the only positive root of the rank-one subsystem is , [F4] shows that is minimal in , and . Thus each pair is a valid label in [F3].
Write on . The positive roots in step 1.1 restrict respectively to . Thus gives the whole relative space and is excluded, while the distinct proper traces are , and . These are respectively , and . Their complement has six sectors.
Normalize the tuple by ; then . By [F1], exactly when , with equality exactly at positions . The six permutations in step 2.2 therefore give, respectively, the strict conditions , , , , and . These are the six sectors of step 3.1 in counterclockwise order from the positive quadrant. Applying the labelling bijection [F3] establishes every displayed label and completes the verification.
Source notes
The article reference attributes the example and the labels read from its diagram. The calculation above verifies them using the listed suppliers; it does not use the article's example as a premise.
Depends on
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Normalisers of parabolic subgroups of Artin–Tits groups and Tits cone intersections · PDF p. 10, Example 3.12 and diagram