Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-generatedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Real Coxeter representation and contragredient notation

Definition

Let S be a finite set and m:S×S→{1,2,3,…}∪{∞} a Coxeter matrix: m(s,s)=1 and, for s≠t, m(s,t)=m(t,s)∈{2,3,…}∪{∞}. Its presented Coxeter group is W=⟨S∣s2=1, (st)m(s,t)=1 when s≠t and m(s,t)<∞⟩.

Let V=RS, the space of real-valued functions on S, and let es be the function that is 1 at s and 0 elsewhere. The Coxeter form B is the symmetric bilinear form determined by B(es,es)=1, B(es,et)=−cos⁡(π/m(s,t)) for distinct s,t with finite m(s,t), and B(es,et)=−1 when m(s,t)=∞. Put rs(v)=v−2B(v,es)es. The canonical real reflection representation is the homomorphism ρ:W→GL(V) satisfying ρ(s)=rs. Here GL(V) is the group of invertible linear maps from V to itself. Write wv for ρ(w)v, αs=es, and call the elements of Φ={wes:w∈W, s∈S} roots.

Let Θ=V∗ be the algebraic dual, the space of all real-valued linear functionals on V. The contragredient action is (wf)(v)=f(ρ(w)−1v) for w∈W, f∈Θ, and v∈V. The closed chamber is C={f∈Θ:f(es)≥0 for all s∈S}, and the open chamber is C∘={f∈Θ:f(es)>0 for all s∈S}. For I⊆S, its face of type I is CI={f∈Θ:f(es)=0 for s∈I, f(es)>0 for s∉I}. For α∈Φ, the root hyperplane is Hα={f∈Θ:f(α)=0}.

No nondegeneracy of B is assumed, and V is not identified with V∗ using B. These conventions apply to finite S; no infinite-rank extension is asserted here.

Justification

The finite-dimensional form and the maps rs are defined by the specified basis values. The reflection representation descends uniquely from the presented group: its generators satisfy the defining relations, as established in Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections. Thus each ρ(w) is invertible and the displayed dual formula is meaningful. The latter is a left action by linear maps, and the indicated faces exist, by The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling. The chamber, face, root and hyperplane expressions are consequently well-defined subsets of the spaces specified in the definition.

Depends on

Used by · 24

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.