How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Real Coxeter representation and contragredient notation
Definition
Let be a finite set and a Coxeter matrix: and, for , . Its presented Coxeter group is .
Let , the space of real-valued functions on , and let be the function that is at and elsewhere. The Coxeter form is the symmetric bilinear form determined by , for distinct with finite , and when . Put . The canonical real reflection representation is the homomorphism satisfying . Here is the group of invertible linear maps from to itself. Write for , , and call the elements of roots.
Let be the algebraic dual, the space of all real-valued linear functionals on . The contragredient action is for , , and . The closed chamber is , and the open chamber is . For , its face of type is . For , the root hyperplane is .
No nondegeneracy of is assumed, and is not identified with using . These conventions apply to finite ; no infinite-rank extension is asserted here.
Definition references
Justification
The finite-dimensional form and the maps are defined by the specified basis values. The reflection representation descends uniquely from the presented group: its generators satisfy the defining relations, as established in Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections. Thus each is invertible and the displayed dual formula is meaningful. The latter is a left action by linear maps, and the indicated faces exist, by The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling. The chamber, face, root and hyperplane expressions are consequently well-defined subsets of the spaces specified in the definition.
Depends on
- Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups
- The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps
- The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone
- Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections
- The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes
- The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling
- Linear functionals and the algebraic dual V^*=L(V,F)
Used by · 24
- Root signs, inversions and descent translation
- Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions
- Reflecting hyperplanes, fundamental chamber and Tits cone
- Classical free action and covering exact sequence
- Distinct roots can define the same relative hyperplane
- Convexity, stratification and faces of the relative cone
- Failure of local finiteness on the full cone
- Segment intersections and the inversion bound
- Relative cones can avoid the interior of the full cone
- Minimal coset representatives remove chamber-label ambiguity
- A3 relative arrangement and its six labelled chambers
- The relative normaliser action need not be chamber-transitive
- Translation between relative arrangements in the geodesic argument
- Spherical relative arrangements and Deligne topology
- A3 doubled adjacency graph
- Equivariant chamber-point and path assignment
- D4 diagram and generator conventions
- The twelve D4 positive roots
- Seven relative D4 hyperplanes and thirty-two chambers
- Roots of the infinite dihedral geometric representation
- The infinite dihedral Tits cone is an open half-plane with its vertex
- Component opposition transports the retained simple roots
- Componentwise crossings are inverse elements
- The flop restriction complement is the finite ADE relative complement
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.