How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
D4 diagram and generator conventions
PDF p. 27: §7 opening diagram and paragraph
Definition
For this example, let denote the Coxeter diagram with vertices and three unlabelled edges , and . Thus vertex is trivalent: it is incident to exactly three edges. Equivalently, the Coxeter matrix has , for , and for distinct .
Let be the associated Coxeter system, with , and set . Write , , and ; in particular is the simple reflection at the trivalent vertex.
Let be the standard geometric representation: its Coxeter form satisfies , for , and for distinct ; the generator acts by . Let be the space of real linear functionals on , with the contragredient action for , and .
Definition references
Justification
By Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions, an unlabelled edge records matrix entry and absence of an edge records entry ; hence the stated diagram and matrix specify the same data. The matrix is symmetric, has diagonal entries and allowed off-diagonal entries, so the associated presented Coxeter group and its simple generators are defined. The set is a subset of the vertex set, and the letters are aliases for those generators.
The finite-rank construction in Real Coxeter representation and contragredient notation supplies the representation and dual action for this matrix. Its form has off-diagonal values on the three edges and on the remaining pairs, giving the displayed formulas. The same supplier ensures that the reflection maps define a group action and that the contragredient formula defines an action on .
Depends on
Used by · 12
- cD4 geometric occurrence and core-coset context
- The twelve D4 positive roots
- Seven relative D4 hyperplanes and thirty-two chambers
- A relative arrangement need not be a reflection arrangement
- D4 chamber labels and complete adjacency graph
- Universal groupoid interpretation of the D4 graph
- Normaliser-action wording in the D4 exposition
- D4 Brink–Howlett generating graph
- Eight-element D4 normaliser quotient vertex group
- Explicit D4 atomic braid relations and lifted paths
- D4 Deligne and ribbon graphs without quadratic relations
- Explicit D4 comparison functors
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Normalisers of parabolic subgroups of Artin–Tits groups and Tits cone intersections · PDF p. 27, §7 opening diagram and paragraph; §7.1 opening sentence