How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reflecting hyperplanes, fundamental chamber and Tits cone
PDF p. 4: §2.2 before Notation 2.1; PDF p. 5: §2.2 before Notation 2.1
Definition
For the geometry in this item, let the vertex set be finite. This is the finite-rank Coxeter-graph convention of Iyama–Wemyss, §§1.1–1.3; the Coxeter group may be infinite. Use the geometric representation, roots and algebraic dual of Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions, specialized to this finite vertex set, and the finite-rank realization of Real Coxeter representation and contragredient notation.
The coordinate map , , is a linear isomorphism. Give its transported Euclidean topology, as in Locally finite arrangements and relative face terminology. For a subset , its closure consists of points every open neighbourhood of which meets ; its interior is the union of open subsets contained in .
For each root define the reflecting hyperplane and the set of distinct such hyperplanes by Define the open fundamental chamber and its closure by The Tits cone and its interior in are The notation uses the contragredient action: . The family is a set, so coincident hyperplanes are included only once.
Justification
The finite simple-root basis identifies each functional with its freely prescribed coordinates, giving the asserted coordinate isomorphism. The transported Euclidean topology and its neighbourhood and closure conventions are those of Locally finite arrangements and relative face terminology. Each coordinate evaluation is continuous, so the finite intersection defining is open. Its closure is contained in the nonnegative coordinate orthant. Conversely, for any functional in that orthant, adding to every coordinate gives a point of converging to it as . This proves the stated formula for , including the empty-vertex case.
Every root is nonzero in the finite-rank representation of Real Coxeter representation and contragredient notation: by clause (3) of Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections, its Coxeter-form norm is . If a coordinate of is nonzero, the corresponding coordinate functional evaluates nontrivially on . Thus is a nonzero linear functional on , and its kernel is a linear hyperplane. The contragredient action is already well-defined by Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions; its translates and their union therefore define subsets of , whose interior is specified by the chosen topology. These definitions do not require to be finite. Convexity, fundamental-domain and local-finiteness assertions are separate results.
Source notes
The article calls open in §2.2 and explicitly invokes a finite-dimensional vector space in the proof of Proposition 3.6. Its §2.2 follows Iyama–Wemyss for , and §3 follows their construction. Iyama–Wemyss §1.1 explicitly starts with an Coxeter matrix and the vertex set . The finite-rank geometric convention is made explicit here; it does not change the arbitrary-rank algebraic definitions in Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions or assert an infinite-rank topological extension.
Depends on
- Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions
- Real Coxeter representation and contragredient notation
- Locally finite arrangements and relative face terminology
- Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections
- Osamu Iyama and Michael Wemyss, Tits Cone Intersections and Applications · §1.1, printed p. 3 / PDF p. 27; §1.2 and §1.3, printed p. 4 / PDF p. 28; §1.3, printed p. 5 / PDF p. 29
Used by · 14
- Basic Tits-cone properties
- Classical complexified hyperplane complement
- Classical free action and covering exact sequence
- Classical K(pi,1) conjecture
- Reported proved families for the classical conjecture
- Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements
- Separation by a hyperplane
- Only finitely many hyperplanes separate two Tits-cone points
- Segment intersections and the inversion bound
- Length additivity and the base-chamber half-space
- Main spherical theorem combining exact sequences and asphericity
- K(pi,1) conjecture for arbitrary normaliser quotients
- Seven relative D4 hyperplanes and thirty-two chambers
- Universal wall graph as a groupoid Cayley graph
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The Coxeter matrix is an n by n matrix and its Coxeter graph has vertex set {1,...,n}. The group need not be finite. The geometric representation has the simple-root basis, its dual Θ has the dual basis, and the fundamental chamber consists of strictly positive dual coordinates. The Tits cone is the union of translates of the nonnegative chamber.
Hypotheses: Finite Coxeter graph, with arbitrary Coxeter matrix labels and without requiring the Coxeter group to be finite.
Reading limits: Read the extracted text of §§1.1–1.3 for these definitions and rank convention, and visually inspected PDF p. 27. This source supplies the finite-rank convention and geometric definitions only; no subsequent theorem or proof is imported here.
Sources
- Normalisers of parabolic subgroups of Artin–Tits groups and Tits cone intersections · §2.2, PDF pp. 4–5; Proposition 3.6 proof, PDF p. 9
- Osamu Iyama and Michael Wemyss, Tits Cone Intersections and Applications · §1.1, printed p. 3 / PDF p. 27; §1.2 and §1.3, printed p. 4 / PDF p. 28; §1.3, printed p. 5 / PDF p. 29