How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The infinite dihedral Tits cone is an open half-plane with its vertex
Statement
In the infinite dihedral real Coxeter representation with and , use dual coordinates , , , , and root hyperplanes for . Equip the dual coordinate plane with its standard Euclidean topology. Define the closed fundamental chamber by and the Tits cone by the union of its -translates under the contragredient action. The cone is , and its interior in the dual plane is . Give the subspace topology. The arrangement is locally finite in , meaning that every point of has a neighbourhood in meeting only finitely many of these hyperplanes, and every meets .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The infinite dihedral roots, dual coordinates and hyperplanes of Roots of the infinite dihedral geometric representation. Goal: Compute the chamber translates, their interior and local finiteness.
The reflection representation and contragredient action are those of Real Coxeter representation and contragredient notation: and , with .
Interior has the metric meaning of Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space, using the Euclidean distance in the dual plane. On use the subspace topology of Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace.
Local finiteness means the neighbourhood condition of Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements, applied to the family in . Its members are distinct because .
Proof
Since and , the reflection and contragredient formulas give and . In coordinates these preserve and send to and , respectively. The closed chamber is , .
For fixed , these two reflections generate translations and their compositions with , for . Images of are exactly the consecutive intervals , so their union is the entire line. For the chamber contains only , fixed by the group; no translate meets . Thus the union is . At any point with , a Euclidean ball of radius less than stays in this union. Every ball about the origin meets , so the origin is not interior. The interior is therefore .
For any , choose and . The set is an open neighbourhood of in . If it meets , then at a point of intersection. Only finitely many integers satisfy that bound, proving local finiteness. Each contains with , so it meets .
Depends on
- Roots of the infinite dihedral geometric representation
- Real Coxeter representation and contragredient notation
- Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements
- Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.