Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The infinite dihedral Tits cone is an open half-plane with its vertex

Statement

In the infinite dihedral real Coxeter representation with S={s,t} and m(s,t)=∞, use dual coordinates x=f(αs), y=f(αt), a=x+y, b=x, and root hyperplanes Hk={b+ka=0} for k∈Z. Equip the dual coordinate plane (a,b)∈R2 with its standard Euclidean topology. Define the closed fundamental chamber by x,y≥0 and the Tits cone by the union of its W-translates under the contragredient action. The cone is {a>0}∪{0}, and its interior in the dual plane is I={a>0}. Give I the subspace topology. The arrangement {Hk:k∈Z} is locally finite in I, meaning that every point of I has a neighbourhood in I meeting only finitely many of these hyperplanes, and every Hk meets I.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Given: The infinite dihedral roots, dual coordinates and hyperplanes of Roots of the infinite dihedral geometric representation. Goal: Compute the chamber translates, their interior and local finiteness.

[F2]

The reflection representation and contragredient action are those of Real Coxeter representation and contragredient notation: ru(v)=v−2B(v,αu)αu and (wf)(v)=f(w−1v), with B(αs,αt)=−1.

[F3]

Interior has the metric meaning of Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space, using the Euclidean distance d((a,b),(a′,b′))=(a−a′)2+(b−b′)2 in the dual plane. On I use the subspace topology of Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace.

[F4]

Local finiteness means the neighbourhood condition of Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements, applied to the family {Hk∩I:k∈Z} in I. Its members are distinct because Hk∩I={(a,−ka):a>0}.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2algebra

Since s−1=s and t−1=t, the reflection and contragredient formulas give s(x,y)=(−x,y+2x) and t(x,y)=(x+2y,−y). In coordinates (a,b) these preserve a and send b to −b and 2a−b, respectively. The closed chamber is a≥0, 0≤b≤a.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

For fixed a>0, these two reflections generate translations b↦b+2ma and their compositions with b↦−b, for m∈Z. Images of [0,a] are exactly the consecutive intervals [na,(n+1)a], so their union is the entire line. For a=0 the chamber contains only (0,0), fixed by the group; no translate meets a<0. Thus the union is {a>0}∪{0}. At any point with a>0, a Euclidean ball of radius less than a stays in this union. Every ball about the origin meets a<0, so the origin is not interior. The interior is therefore I={a>0}.

3.1F1F3F4step 2.1algebra∎

For any (a0,b0)∈I, choose 0<ε<a0 and R>∣b0∣. The set U={(a,b):a>ε, ∣b∣<R} is an open neighbourhood of (a0,b0) in I. If it meets Hk, then ∣k∣=∣b∣/a<R/ε at a point of intersection. Only finitely many integers satisfy that bound, proving local finiteness. Each Hk contains pk with (a,b)=(1,−k), so it meets I.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.